PURPOSE: To compare infectious organisms and visual outcomes of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection (IVI) with endophthalmitis after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). METHODS: Retrospective, comparative, consecutive case series of patients diagnosed with presumed infectious endophthalmitis after IVI of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medication or PPV between January 1, 2009, and October 1, 2012, from one center. Main outcome measures were infectious organism and final visual acuity. RESULTS: Forty-four cases of presumed infectious endophthalmitis (17 culture positive) occurred after IVI and 19 cases (9 culture positive) occurred after PPV. Of note, 56.3% of culture-positive IVI cases were due to bacteria associated with oral flora, primarily Streptococcus species, compared with none in the PPV group (P = 0.01). There was a trend approaching significance for IVI patients to have lost ≥3 lines of visual acuity compared with PPV patients at final follow-up (P = 0.07). Within the IVI group, patients were more likely to have lost ≥6 lines of visual acuity at final follow-up when endophthalmitis was due to an organism associated with oral flora (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Endophthalmitis after IVI has a higher likelihood of being due to oral flora compared with endophthalmitis after PPV. Among IVI patients, worse visual outcomes occurred when endophthalmitis was due to oral flora.
PURPOSE: To compare infectious organisms and visual outcomes of endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection (IVI) with endophthalmitis after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). METHODS: Retrospective, comparative, consecutive case series of patients diagnosed with presumed infectious endophthalmitis after IVI of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor medication or PPV between January 1, 2009, and October 1, 2012, from one center. Main outcome measures were infectious organism and final visual acuity. RESULTS: Forty-four cases of presumed infectious endophthalmitis (17 culture positive) occurred after IVI and 19 cases (9 culture positive) occurred after PPV. Of note, 56.3% of culture-positive IVI cases were due to bacteria associated with oral flora, primarily Streptococcus species, compared with none in the PPV group (P = 0.01). There was a trend approaching significance for IVI patients to have lost ≥3 lines of visual acuity compared with PPVpatients at final follow-up (P = 0.07). Within the IVI group, patients were more likely to have lost ≥6 lines of visual acuity at final follow-up when endophthalmitis was due to an organism associated with oral flora (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION:Endophthalmitis after IVI has a higher likelihood of being due to oral flora compared with endophthalmitis after PPV. Among IVI patients, worse visual outcomes occurred when endophthalmitis was due to oral flora.
Authors: Joseph M Simonett; Austin Igelman; Stanford C Taylor; J Peter Campbell; Thomas S Hwang; Phoebe Lin; Andreas K Lauer; Christina J Flaxel Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 1.300
Authors: Samir N Patel; Jason Hsu; Meera D Sivalingam; Allen Chiang; Richard S Kaiser; Sonia Mehta; Carl H Park; Carl D Regillo; Arunan Sivalingam; James F Vander; Allen C Ho; Sunir J Garg Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Santiago Angaramo; Janice C Law; Alexander Spyros Maris; Jonathan Edward Schmitz; Yuhan Liu; Qingxia Chen; Amy Chomsky Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2021-10-05
Authors: Ana Maria Cunha; Maria Manuel Iglésias; Amândio Rocha-Sousa; Fernando Falcão-Reis; Manuel Falcão Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 1.909