Literature DB >> 26200190

Factor Structure and Internal Validity of the Functional Movement Screen in Adults.

Michael S Koehle1, Boaz Y Saffer, Nadine M Sinnen, Martin J MacInnis.   

Abstract

The factor structure and internal consistency of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) have not been examined in a general healthcare population. Replicating the factor structure of the FMS is important because it illustrates the interdependence between each of the subtests, enabling the strength and conditioning professional to better interpret and act on an individual's FMS score. Anthropometric data and FMS scores were collected from 1,113 clients of a multidisciplinary healthcare clinic in Vancouver, BC The mean (SD) ages were 53.4 (11.1) for men (n = 656) and 49.3 (12.3) for women (n = 457). The mean FMS Summary Score was 13.7 (2.9) and was significantly negatively correlated with both age (r = -0.25; p < 0.001) and body mass index (r = -0.37; p < 0.001). The internal consistency of the FMS scale, which was assessed with both ordinal and Cronbach's alpha, was 0.73 and 0.64, respectively. Polychoric correlations between individual movements ranged from 0.03 to 0.59. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) revealed that the FMS showed 2 main factors, a basic movement factor (shoulder mobility and active straight leg raise) and a complex movement factor (squat, hurdle step, inline lunge, and the trunk stability push-up). Rotary stability loaded onto both factors in the CFA, and its exclusion from the model had little effect. The findings of this study broadly replicated the intended factor structure of the FMS, as the individual movements aligned well with the intended factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26200190     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

1.  LOAD-ENHANCED MOVEMENT QUALITY SCREENING AND TACTICAL ATHLETICISM: AN EXTENSION OF EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Stephen M Glass; Randy J Schmitz; Christopher K Rhea; Scott E Ross
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-06

2.  The Functional Movement Screen as a Predictor of Injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II Athletes.

Authors:  Bryan Dorrel; Terry Long; Scott Shaffer; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  INTRA-RATER TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY AND RESPONSE STABILITY OF THE FUSIONETICS™ MOVEMENT EFFICIENCY TEST.

Authors:  David J Cornell; Kyle T Ebersole
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

Review 4.  Utility of FMS to understand injury incidence in sports: current perspectives.

Authors:  Meghan Warren; Monica R Lininger; Nicole J Chimera; Craig A Smith
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2018-09-07

5.  Reliability assessment of the functional movement screen for predicting injury risk in Japanese college soccer players.

Authors:  Takayuki Miyamori; Masashi Nagao; Yu Shimasaki; Takayuki Okazaki; Naoki Akiyoshi; Hirofumi Nishio; Yuji Takazawa; Masafumi Yoshimura
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2020-12-11

6.  Differences of quadriceps activity during inline lunge by using FMS assessment.

Authors:  Jong-Kyung Lee; Jae-Kwang Lee; Jong-Ha Hwang; Chan-Myeong Kim; Ji-Won Park
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2021-02-13

7.  Low composite functional movement screen score associated with decline of gait stability in young adults.

Authors:  Myeounggon Lee; Changhong Youm; Byungjoo Noh; Hwayoung Park
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.