Literature DB >> 26200166

A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Continuous versus Intermittent β-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis.

Joel M Dulhunty1,2, Jason A Roberts1,3,2, Joshua S Davis4,5, Steven A R Webb6,7, Rinaldo Bellomo8,9, Charles Gomersall10,11, Charudatt Shirwadkar12, Glenn M Eastwood8, John Myburgh13,14, David L Paterson15,16, Therese Starr1,2, Sanjoy K Paul17, Jeffrey Lipman1,2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Continuous infusion of β-lactam antibiotics may improve outcomes because of time-dependent antibacterial activity compared with intermittent dosing.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of continuous versus intermittent infusion in patients with severe sepsis.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in 25 intensive care units (ICUs). Participants commenced on piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, or meropenem were randomized to receive the prescribed antibiotic via continuous or 30-minute intermittent infusion for the remainder of the treatment course or until ICU discharge. The primary outcome was the number of alive ICU-free days at Day 28. Secondary outcomes were 90-day survival, clinical cure 14 days post antibiotic cessation, alive organ failure-free days at Day 14, and duration of bacteremia.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We enrolled 432 eligible participants with a median age of 64 years and an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 20. There was no difference in ICU-free days: 18 days (interquartile range, 2-24) and 20 days (interquartile range, 3-24) in the continuous and intermittent groups (P = 0.38). There was no difference in 90-day survival: 74.3% (156 of 210) and 72.5% (158 of 218); hazard ratio, 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.31; P = 0.61). Clinical cure was 52.4% (111 of 212) and 49.5% (109 of 220); odds ratio, 1.12 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.63; P = 0.56). There was no difference in organ failure-free days (6 d; P = 0.27) and duration of bacteremia (0 d; P = 0.24).
CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients with severe sepsis, there was no difference in outcomes between β-lactam antibiotic administration by continuous and intermittent infusion. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number (ACT RN12612000138886).

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotic; clinical outcome; intensive care; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26200166     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201505-0857OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  64 in total

1.  Continuous infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for all critically ill patients?

Authors:  Fabio S Taccone; Kevin B Laupland; Philippe Montravers
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Prolonged Versus Intermittent Infusion of β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression of Bacterial Killing in Preclinical Infection Models.

Authors:  Sofie Dhaese; Aaron Heffernan; David Liu; Mohd Hafiz Abdul-Aziz; Veronique Stove; Vincent H Tam; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Jan J De Waele
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Therapies for multidrug resistant and extensively drug-resistant non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria causing nosocomial infections: a perilous journey toward 'molecularly targeted' therapy.

Authors:  Nadim G El Chakhtoura; Elie Saade; Alina Iovleva; Mohamad Yasmin; Brigid Wilson; Federico Perez; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 4.  Challenges in the management of septic shock: a narrative review.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Maurizio Cecconi; Jeffrey Lipman; Flavia Machado; Sheila Nainan Myatra; Marlies Ostermann; Anders Perner; Jean-Louis Teboul; Jean-Louis Vincent; Keith R Walley
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Should Prolonged Infusion of β-Lactams Become Standard of Practice?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

6.  Personalized antibiotic dosing for the critically ill.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Claire Roger; Jan J De Waele
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Beta-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis (BLISS): a prospective, two-centre, open-labelled randomised controlled trial of continuous versus intermittent beta-lactam infusion in critically ill patients with severe sepsis.

Authors:  Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Helmi Sulaiman; Mohd-Basri Mat-Nor; Vineya Rai; Kang K Wong; Mohd S Hasan; Azrin N Abd Rahman; Janattul A Jamal; Steven C Wallis; Jeffrey Lipman; Christine E Staatz; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Continuous and Prolonged Intravenous β-Lactam Dosing: Implications for the Clinical Laboratory.

Authors:  Mordechai Grupper; Joseph L Kuti; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin following Continuous Infusion in Critically Ill Patients and Impact of Renal Function on Target Attainment.

Authors:  Vibeke Klastrup; Anders Thorsted; Merete Storgaard; Steffen Christensen; Lena E Friberg; Kristina Öbrink-Hansen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  [Therapeutic drug monitoring and individual dosing of antibiotics during sepsis : Modern or just "trendy"?]

Authors:  A Brinkmann; A C Röhr; A Köberer; T Fuchs; J Preisenberger; W A Krüger; O R Frey
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 0.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.