Literature DB >> 26200138

The brain and the braincase: a spatial analysis on the midsagittal profile in adult humans.

Emiliano Bruner1, Hideki Amano2, José Manuel de la Cuétara3, Naomichi Ogihara2.   

Abstract

The spatial relationships between brain and braincase represent a major topic in surgery and evolutionary neuroanatomy. In paleoneurology, neurocranial landmarks are often used as references for brain areas. In this study, we analyze the variation and covariation of midsagittal brain and skull coordinates in a sample of adult modern humans in order to demonstrate spatial associations between hard and soft tissues. The correlation between parietal lobe size and parietal bone size is very low, and there is a marked individual variation. The distances between lobes and bones are partially influenced by the dimensions of the parietal lobes. The main pattern of morphological variability among individuals, associated with the size of the precuneus, apparently does not influence the position of the neurocranial sutures. Therefore, variations in precuneal size modify the distance between the paracentral lobule and bregma, and between the parietal lobe and lambda. Hence, the relative position of the cranial and cerebral landmarks can change as a function of the parietal dimensions. The slight correlation and covariation among these elements suggests a limited degree of spatial integration between soft and hard tissues. Therefore, although the brain influences the cranial size and shape during morphogenesis, the specific position of the cerebral components is sensitive to multiple effects and local factors, without a strict correspondence with the bone landmarks. This absence of correspondent change between brain and skull boundaries suggests caution when making inferences about the brain areas from the position of the cranial sutures. The fact that spatial relationships between cranial and brain areas may vary according to brain proportions must be considered in paleoneurology, when brain anatomy is inferred from cranial evidence.
© 2015 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  geometric morphometrics; neuroanatomy; paleoneurology; parietal lobes; precuneus; vault

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26200138      PMCID: PMC4560561          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  32 in total

1.  Use of two-block partial least-squares to study covariation in shape.

Authors:  F J Rohlf; M Corti
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Human midsagittal brain shape variation: patterns, allometry and integration.

Authors:  Emiliano Bruner; Manuel Martin-Loeches; Roberto Colom
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Endocasts: possibilities and limitations for the interpretation of human brain evolution.

Authors:  Simon Neubauer
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Midsagittal brain variation and MRI shape analysis of the precuneus in adult individuals.

Authors:  Emiliano Bruner; Gizéh Rangel de Lázaro; José Manuel de la Cuétara; Manuel Martín-Loeches; Roberto Colom; Heidi I L Jacobs
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  A bivariate approach to the variation of the parietal curvature in the genus homo.

Authors:  Emiliano Bruner; José Manuel De La Cuétara; Ralph Holloway
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution.

Authors:  Fred L Bookstein; Philipp Gunz; Philipp Mitteroecker; Hermann Prossinger; Katrin Schaefer; Horst Seidler
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.895

7.  Midsagittal cranial shape variation in the genus Homo by geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Emiliano Bruner; Barbara Saracino; Francesca Ricci; Maryanne Tafuri; Pietro Passarello; Giorgio Manzi
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2004-06

8.  Central nervous system phenotypes in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Kristina Aldridge; Jeffrey L Marsh; Daniel Govier; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Phenotypic integration of neurocranium and brain.

Authors:  Joan T Richtsmeier; Kristina Aldridge; Valerie B DeLeon; Jayesh Panchal; Alex A Kane; Jeffrey L Marsh; Peng Yan; Theodore M Cole
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 2.656

10.  Modular structure facilitates mosaic evolution of the brain in chimpanzees and humans.

Authors:  Aida Gómez-Robles; William D Hopkins; Chet C Sherwood
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The parietal lobe evolution and the emergence of material culture in the human genus.

Authors:  Emiliano Bruner; Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer; Roberto Caminiti
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Ventral-Dorsal Subregions in the Posterior Cingulate Cortex Represent Pay and Interest, Two Key Attributes of Job Value.

Authors:  Shunsui Matsuura; Shinsuke Suzuki; Kosuke Motoki; Shohei Yamazaki; Ryuta Kawashima; Motoaki Sugiura
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-03-09

3.  Effects of cranial integration on hominid endocranial shape.

Authors:  Christoph P E Zollikofer; Thibaut Bienvenu; Marcia S Ponce de León
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Shape analysis of spatial relationships between orbito-ocular and endocranial structures in modern humans and fossil hominids.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Pereira-Pedro; Michael Masters; Emiliano Bruner
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Integration of Brain and Skull in Prenatal Mouse Models of Apert and Crouzon Syndromes.

Authors:  Susan M Motch Perrine; Tim Stecko; Thomas Neuberger; Ethylin W Jabs; Timothy M Ryan; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Covariation of the endocranium and splanchnocranium during great ape ontogeny.

Authors:  Nadia A Scott; André Strauss; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Philipp Gunz; Simon Neubauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Are endocasts good proxies for brain size and shape in archosaurs throughout ontogeny?

Authors:  Akinobu Watanabe; Paul M Gignac; Amy M Balanoff; Todd L Green; Nathan J Kley; Mark A Norell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Evidence for independent brain and neurocranial reorganization during hominin evolution.

Authors:  José Luis Alatorre Warren; Marcia S Ponce de León; William D Hopkins; Christoph P E Zollikofer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The evolution of modern human brain shape.

Authors:  Simon Neubauer; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Philipp Gunz
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 10.  The language-ready head: Evolutionary considerations.

Authors:  Cedric Boeckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.