Literature DB >> 26200098

Superior Mesenteric Artery Margin of Posttherapy Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Prognosis in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Li Liu1, Matthew H Katz, Sun M Lee, Laurice K Fischer, Laura Prakash, Nathan Parker, Hua Wang, Gauri R Varadhachary, Robert A Wolff, Jeffrey E Lee, Peter W Pisters, Anirban Maitra, Jason B Fleming, Jeannelyn Estrella, Asif Rashid, Huamin Wang.   

Abstract

Negative-margin resection is crucial to favorable prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, the definition of a negative superior mesenteric artery margin (SMAM) varies. The College of American Pathologists defines positive SMAM as the presence of tumor cells at the margin, whereas the European protocol is based on a 1 mm clearance. In this study, we examined the prognostic significance of the SMAM distance in 411 consecutive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients who completed neoadjuvant therapy and pancreaticoduodenectomy. Per College of American Pathologists criteria, 32 (7.8%) had positive margins, and 379 (92.2%) had negative margins. Among margin-negative group, SMAM was ≤ 1, 1.0 to 5.0, and >5.0 mm in 66, 145, and 168 patients, respectively. There was no difference in either disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) between the positive-margin group and SMAM ≤ 1 mm (P > 0.05). However, patients with SMAM 1.0 to 5.0 mm had better OS than those with positive margins or SMAM ≤ 1 mm (P = 0.02). Patients with SMAM > 5.0 mm had better DFS and OS than those with SMAM 1.0 to 5.0 mm and those with positive margins or SMAM ≤ 1 mm (P < 0.01). By multivariate analysis, the SMAM distance, tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and histopathologic tumor response grade were independent prognostic factors for both DFS and OS. SMAM distance correlated with lower ypT and AJCC stages, smaller tumor size, better histopathologic tumor response grade, fewer lymph node metastases, and recurrences (P < 0.05). Thus our results strongly support use of SMAM > 1 mm for R0 resection in posttherapy pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26200098     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  23 in total

Review 1.  Pathologic assessment of gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Reetesh K Pai; Rish K Pai
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Intestinal autotransplantation for neoplasms originating in the pancreatic head with involvement of the superior mesenteric artery.

Authors:  Guosheng Wu; Xin Wang; Qingchuan Zhao; Weizhong Wang; Hai Shi; Mian Wang; Jingson Zhang; Zengshan Li; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Impact of hypofractionated and standard fractionated chemoradiation before pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Christopher H Crane; Eugene J Koay; Prajnan Das; Sunil Krishnan; Laura Prakash; Rebecca A Snyder; Gauri R Varadhachary; Robert A Wolff; Milind Javle; Rachna T Shroff; David Fogelman; Michael Overman; Huamin Wang; Anirban Maitra; Jeffrey E Lee; Jason B Fleming; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Re-evaluation of classical prognostic factors in resectable ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  Daniel Åkerberg; Daniel Ansari; Roland Andersson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Pathological analysis of the superior mesenteric artery boundary in preoperative computed tomography of resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Meng Lu; Chun-Hui Yuan; Ling-Fu Zhang; Lian-Yuan Tao; Ying Peng; Li-Mei Guo; Gang Li; Dian-Rong Xiu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Preoperative Therapy and Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: a 25-Year Single-Institution Experience.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Matthew H G Katz; Laura Prakash; Gauri R Varadhachary; Robert A Wolff; Rachna T Shroff; Milind Javle; David Fogelman; Michael Overman; Christopher H Crane; Eugene J Koay; Prajnan Das; Sunil Krishnan; Bruce D Minsky; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Brian Weston; William Ross; Priya Bhosale; Eric P Tamm; Huamin Wang; Anirban Maitra; Michael P Kim; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicholas Vauthey; Jason B Fleming; James L Abbruzzese; Peter W T Pisters; Douglas B Evans; Jeffrey E Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Significance of Cancer Cells at the Vein Edge in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Following Pancreatectomy with Vein Resection.

Authors:  Laura R Prakash; Huamin Wang; Jun Zhao; Graciela M Nogueras-Gonzalez; Jordan M Cloyd; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Michael P Kim; Jeffrey E Lee; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Association of Clinical Factors With a Major Pathologic Response Following Preoperative Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Huamin Wang; Michael E Egger; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Laura R Prakash; Anirban Maitra; Gauri R Varadhachary; Rachna Shroff; Milind Javle; David Fogelman; Robert A Wolff; Michael J Overman; Eugene J Koay; Prajnan Das; Joseph M Herman; Michael P Kim; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Thomas A Aloia; Jason B Fleming; Jeffrey E Lee; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  The Prognostic Value of Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Resected Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Le-Ping Fang; Xiao-Yan Xu; Yu Ji; Pu-Wen Huang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Pathologic Response to Preoperative Therapy as a Novel Prognosticator for Ampullary and Duodenal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Suguru Yamashita; Michael J Overman; Huamin Wang; Jun Zhao; Masayuki Okuno; Claire Goumard; Ching-Wei Tzeng; Michael Kim; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Matthew H Katz; Jeffrey E Lee; Claudius Conrad
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.