| Literature DB >> 26199944 |
Hao Xu1, Yonghua Niu1, Tao Wang1, Simin Liu2, Hua Xu1, Shaogang Wang1, Jihong Liu1, Zhangqun Ye1.
Abstract
Kallmann syndrome (KS) is characterized by isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) with anosmia and is sometimes associated with cleft lip/palate (CLP). In order to describe the clinical features, genetic etiology, and treatment outcome of KS males with CLP, we performed genetic screening for 15 known causal IHH genes (KAL1, FGFR1, NELF, FGF8, CHD7, WDR11, SEMA3A, KISS1R, KISS1, PROKR2, PROK2, TAC3, TACR3, GNRH1, and GNRHR) in four KS with CLP patients and six IHH patients without CLP. Two novel heterozygous missense mutations in FGFR1, (NM_001174066): c.776G>A (p.G259E) and (NM_001174066): c.358C>T (p.R120C), were identified in a 23-year-old KS male with cleft lip and an 18-year-old KS patient with cleft lip and palate, dental agenesis, and high arched palate, respectively. These two mutations were not presented in their healthy parents and 200 normal controls. One novel heterozygous missense mutation in KISS1R, (NM_032551): c.587C>A (p.P196H), was identified in an 18-year-old KS male with cleft lip and dental agenesis who developed sperm after being treated with gonadotropin. This mutation was also presented in his healthy father and grandfather. These results have implications for the diagnosis, genetic counseling, and treatment of KS and CLP males with mutations in FGFR1 gene.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26199944 PMCID: PMC4496468 DOI: 10.1155/2015/649698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Summary of clinical assessment of the four Kallmann syndrome males with cleft lip/palate.
| Case no. | Age at diagnosis (yr) | Clinical diagnosis | Inheritance | Olfactory | Olfactory bulbs on MRI | Renal findings on ultrasounds | Other features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | KS | Sporadic | Anosmia | Absence (B) | Normal | Cleft lip, gynecomastia |
| 2 | 18 | KS | Sporadic | Anosmia | Absence (B) | Normal | Cleft lip, dental agenesis |
| 3 | 18 | KS | Sporadic | Anosmia | Absence (B) | Normal | Cleft lip and palate, dental agenesis, high arched palate |
| 4 | 18 | KS | Familial | Anosmia | Absence (B) | Normal | Cleft lip |
B, bilateral; CLP, cleft lip/palate.
Figure 1The sequencing coverage of the 15 genes from the ten samples. Blue graphs represent the distribution of coverage of 15 IHH genes from 10 samples. The dashed line is the mean coverage (1402X) of the 15 IHH genes.
Novel mutations detected by semiconductor sequencing and confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
| Case no. | Position | Gene | Type | Zygosity | Nucleotide substitution | Consequence | Novelty | Sanger sequencing validation | SIFT score | PolyPhen result | PhyloP score | GERP++ score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38279353 |
| SNV | Het | C/T | Nonsynonymous | Novel | TURE | 0 | D | 2.542 | 5.4 |
| 2 | 919955 |
| SNV | Het | C/A | Nonsynonymous | Previously reported | TURE | 0 | D | 2.099 | 4.6 |
| 3 | 38283760 |
| SNV | Het | G/A | Nonsynonymous | Novel | TURE | 0 | D | 2.737 | 5.78 |
Figure 2Mutations in three Kallmann syndrome (KS) males with cleft lip/palate. Heterozygous missense mutations in (a) FGFR1, (NM_001174066): c.776G>A (p.G259E) in case 1, (b) KISSR1, (NM_032551): c.587C>A (p.P196H) in case 2, and (c) FGFR1, NM_001174066: c.358C>T (p.R120C) in case 3. For comparison, normal sequences of the corresponding regions are indicated.
Figure 3Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results of the three Kallmann syndrome males with cleft lip/palate. (a) T2-W MR images show normal structures in a normal control male. The red arrows indicate olfactory bulbs. ((b), (c), (d)) The MRI showed the lack of the bilateral olfactory bulb, the olfactory tract, and sulcus (squares) in cases 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
Biochemical and clinical characteristics of the four Kallmann Syndrome men with cleft lip/palate at baseline and followup.
| Case no. | Heigt (cm) | LH (mIU/mL) | FSH (mIU/mL) |
Testosterone |
Mean Testicular | Penis length (cm) |
Tanner stage of |
Sperm Count | Treatment |
Duration of | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | F | B | F | B | F | B | F | B | F | B | F | B | F | B | F | |||
| 1 | 182 | 185 | 0.97 | 0.48 | 0.92 | 0.30 | 0.15 | 2.03 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 1 | 5 | ND | 0 | hCG | 42 |
| 2 | 172 | 175 | 1.18 | 0.03 | 0.62 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 5.65 | 4.0 | 20.0 | 3.0 | 6.5 | 1 | 5 | ND | 11.92 | hCG | 50 |
| 3 | 171 | 176 | <0.01 | 0.38 | 0.82 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 2.45 | 2.5 | 12.0 | 2.5 | 7.0 | 1 | 5 | ND | ND | hCG | 36 |
| 4 | 172 | 175 | 0.2 | 0.23 | 0.5 | 0.71 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 2.5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | ND | 0 | hCG | 38 |
B, baseline; F, followup; ND, not done.