Inti Qurashi1, Paul Stephenson2, Simon Chu1, Chris Duffy1, Nusrat Husain3, Imran Chaudhry4. 1. Ashworth Hospital, Mersey Care NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK. 2. Ashworth Hospital, Mersey Care NHS Trust, Parkbourn, Liverpool, Merseyside L31 1HW, UK. 3. Institute of Brain, Behaviour & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 4. Adult Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Patients prescribed clozapine were surveyed to assess (a) the effects, both positive and adverse, and overall satisfaction with clozapine in comparison to previously prescribed antipsychotics and (b) the relative significance of effects experienced, both positive and adverse, in terms of impact on subjective well-being. METHODS: A total of 56 male patients prescribed clozapine at a forensic psychiatric hospital were surveyed using a 27-item questionnaire. All patients had been prescribed clozapine for a minimum of 3 months. Respondents were asked to rate effects and satisfaction with clozapine treatment in comparison with previously prescribed antipsychotic medication on a five-point scale. Respondents were also asked to rate effects experienced with clozapine treatment in terms of impact on subjective well-being on a five-point scale. RESULTS: A total of 89% of respondents reported greater satisfaction with clozapine than with previously prescribed antipsychotic medication. A majority of patients reported positive effects in terms of an improvement in their quality of life (68%) and social abilities (52%) with clozapine in comparison with previously prescribed antipsychotics. Nocturnal hypersalivation (84%) and weight gain (57%) were the most common adverse effects. Hedonic responses were assessed for each effect in order to determine the associated subjective experiences. The most positive hedonic responses were for quality of life, mood and alertness. In terms of adverse impact on subjective well-being, nocturnal hypersalivation ranked highest. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in a UK forensic sample are largely satisfied with clozapine treatment. The subjective effects of clozapine treatment should be taken into account by clinicians when assessing response. This may provide an opportunity to highlight the positive changes and prioritize management of the most undesirable adverse effects, which is likely to promote compliance and improve longer term treatment outcomes.
OBJECTIVES:Patients prescribed clozapine were surveyed to assess (a) the effects, both positive and adverse, and overall satisfaction with clozapine in comparison to previously prescribed antipsychotics and (b) the relative significance of effects experienced, both positive and adverse, in terms of impact on subjective well-being. METHODS: A total of 56 male patients prescribed clozapine at a forensic psychiatric hospital were surveyed using a 27-item questionnaire. All patients had been prescribed clozapine for a minimum of 3 months. Respondents were asked to rate effects and satisfaction with clozapine treatment in comparison with previously prescribed antipsychotic medication on a five-point scale. Respondents were also asked to rate effects experienced with clozapine treatment in terms of impact on subjective well-being on a five-point scale. RESULTS: A total of 89% of respondents reported greater satisfaction with clozapine than with previously prescribed antipsychotic medication. A majority of patients reported positive effects in terms of an improvement in their quality of life (68%) and social abilities (52%) with clozapine in comparison with previously prescribed antipsychotics. Nocturnal hypersalivation (84%) and weight gain (57%) were the most common adverse effects. Hedonic responses were assessed for each effect in order to determine the associated subjective experiences. The most positive hedonic responses were for quality of life, mood and alertness. In terms of adverse impact on subjective well-being, nocturnal hypersalivation ranked highest. CONCLUSIONS:Patients in a UK forensic sample are largely satisfied with clozapine treatment. The subjective effects of clozapine treatment should be taken into account by clinicians when assessing response. This may provide an opportunity to highlight the positive changes and prioritize management of the most undesirable adverse effects, which is likely to promote compliance and improve longer term treatment outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
clozapine; forensic; side effects; subjective experience
Authors: D A Wirshing; W C Wirshing; L Kysar; M A Berisford; D Goldstein; J Pashdag; J Mintz; S R Marder Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Kathleen Patchan; Gopal Vyas; Ann L Hackman; Marie Mackowick; Charles M Richardson; Raymond C Love; Ikwunga Wonodi; MacKenzie A Sayer; Matthew Glassman; Stephanie Feldman; Deanna L Kelly Journal: Psychiatr Q Date: 2018-03
Authors: Robert O Cotes; A Umair Janjua; Beth Broussard; David Lazris; Ayesha Khan; Yunshen Jiao; Sarah L Kopelovich; David R Goldsmith Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2021-05-29
Authors: Inti Qurashi; Simon Chu; Richard Drake; Victoria Hartley; Imran Chaudhry; J F W Deakin; Nusrat Husain Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2019-06-17