Literature DB >> 26199539

Treating Dehiscence During Implant Placement and Loading on Angled Abutment in Maxillary Lateral Incisor Region: A Case Report.

K S Sumanth1, B Savitha1, Vijayanti Lotwani1, K Revathi1, Srikanth Reddy1.   

Abstract

The primary factor causing recession is the morphology and anatomy of the dentition. The facial bony plate overlying the root is usually very thin. The complete absence of bone over the facial root surface is referred to as dehiscence. Such buccal bone defects in case of implant dentistry threaten the survival of dental implant. Many surgical techniques are introduced to enhance alveolar bone volume for placing the dental implants. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is one such established surgical technique for correcting buccal dehiscence defects, along with the use of various barrier membranes for the same. This case report describes an implant placement in the maxillary left lateral incisor region showing dehiscence on the labial cortical plate, along with bone graft and GTR membrane.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 26199539      PMCID: PMC4502023          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-014-0376-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  15 in total

Review 1.  Angled implant abutments: a practical application of available knowledge.

Authors:  John Cavallaro; Gary Greenstein
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement.

Authors:  Luca Cordaro; David Sarzi Amadé; Massimo Cordaro
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. 1. Surgical procedure in the maxilla.

Authors:  D Buser; K Dula; U Belser; H P Hirt; H Berthold
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Guided tissue regeneration and endosseous dental implants.

Authors:  J T Mellonig; R G Triplett
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Evaluation of an in situ formed synthetic hydrogel as a biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; Roger Zwahlen; Franz E Weber; Aart Molenberg; G Harry van Lenthe; Christoph H F Hammerle
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Experimental alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis using a simple device that permits secondary implant placement.

Authors:  T Oda; Y Sawaki; M Ueda
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Microbiologic and clinical study of polytetrafluoroethylene membranes for guided bone regeneration around implants.

Authors:  H Nowzari; J Slots
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Treatment of peri-implant defects with guided bone regeneration: a comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts.

Authors:  M Lorenzoni; C Pertl; C Keil; W A Wegscheider
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases.

Authors:  Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Duygu Yaman; Niklaus P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Guided bone regeneration with the combined use of resorbable membranes and autogenous drilling dust or xenografts for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects around implants: an experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  Sang-Hwa Lee; Hyun-Joong Yoon; Min-Kyu Park; You-Sung Kim
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.