Literature DB >> 26199271

Changes in J-SOAP-II and SAVRY Scores Over the Course of Residential, Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Adolescent Sexual Offending.

Jodi L Viljoen1, Andrew L Gray1, Catherine Shaffer1, Natasha E Latzman2, Mario J Scalora3, Daniel Ullman4.   

Abstract

Although the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II) and the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) include an emphasis on dynamic, or modifiable factors, there has been little research on dynamic changes on these tools. To help address this gap, we compared admission and discharge scores of 163 adolescents who attended a residential, cognitive-behavioral treatment program for sexual offending. Based on reliable change indices, one half of youth showed a reliable decrease on the J-SOAP-II Dynamic Risk Total Score and one third of youth showed a reliable decrease on the SAVRY Dynamic Risk Total Score. Contrary to expectations, decreases in risk factors and increases in protective factors did not predict reduced sexual, violent nonsexual, or any reoffending. In addition, no associations were found between scores on the Psychopathy Checklist:Youth Version and levels of change. Overall, the J-SOAP-II and the SAVRY hold promise in measuring change, but further research is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  J-SOAP-II; SAVRY; dynamic factors; risk assessment; sexual offending

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26199271      PMCID: PMC5839137          DOI: 10.1177/1079063215595404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Abuse        ISSN: 1079-0632


  58 in total

1.  Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: a meta-analysis of the J-SOAP-II, ERASOR, J-SORRAT-II, and Static-99.

Authors:  Jodi L Viljoen; Sarah Mordell; Jennifer L Beneteau
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2012-02-20

2.  Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version.

Authors:  K S Douglas; J R Ogloff; T L Nicholls; I Grant
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1999-12

3.  A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data.

Authors:  Georg Heinze
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change.

Authors:  Mark E Olver; Stephen C P Wong; Terry Nicholaichuk; Audrey Gordon
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2007-09

5.  Violent recidivism: assessing predictive validity.

Authors:  M E Rice; G T Harris
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1995-10

6.  Callous-unemotional traits and response to functional family therapy in adolescent offenders.

Authors:  Stuart F White; Paul J Frick; Kathryn Lawing; Daliah Bauer
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2012-11-21

7.  Risk and protective factors for recidivism among juveniles who have offended sexually.

Authors:  Andrew Spice; Jodi L Viljoen; Natasha E Latzman; Mario J Scalora; Daniel Ullman
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2012-10-01

8.  Changing risk factors that impact recidivism: in search of mechanisms of change.

Authors:  Daryl G Kroner; Annie K Yessine
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2013-03-25

9.  Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior.

Authors:  D V Cicchetti; S A Sparrow
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1981-09

10.  Two-year follow-up of a randomized effectiveness trial evaluating MST for juveniles who sexually offend.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Letourneau; Scott W Henggeler; Michael R McCart; Charles M Borduin; Paul A Schewe; Kevin S Armstrong
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2013-11-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Supervision trajectories of male juvenile offenders: growth mixture modeling on SAVRY risk assessments.

Authors:  Ed L B Hilterman; Ilja L Bongers; Tonia L Nicholls; Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.033

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.