Mihaela S Stefan1,2,3, David H Au4, Richard A Mularski5, Jerry A Krishnan6, Eduard T Naureckas7, Shannon S Carson8, Patrick Godwin6, Aruna Priya1, Penelope S Pekow1,9, Peter K Lindenauer1,2,3. 1. Center for Quality of Care Research, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts. 3. Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Pulmonary Division, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington Medicine, Seattle, Washington. 5. Center for Health Research & Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon. 6. University of Illinois-Jesse Brown VAMC, Chicago, Illinois. 7. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 8. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 9. University of Massachusetts Amherst, School of Public Health Sciences, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dyspnea is a common symptom in patients hospitalized with acute cardiopulmonary diseases. Routine assessment of dyspnea severity is recommended by clinical guidelines based on the evidence that patients are not treated consistently for dyspnea relief. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate attitudes and beliefs of hospitalists regarding the assessment and management of dyspnea. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTINGS: Nine hospitals in the United States. MEASUREMENTS: Survey questions assessed the following domains regarding dyspnea: importance in clinical care, potential benefits and challenges of implementing a standardized assessment, current approaches to assessment, and how awareness of severity affects management. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the respondent's level of agreement; strongly agree and agree were combined into a single category. RESULTS: Of the 255 hospitalists invited to participate, 69.8% completed the survey; 77.0% agreed that dyspnea relief is an important goal when treating patients with cardiopulmonary conditions. Approximately 90% of respondents stated that awareness of dyspnea severity influences their decision to intensify treatment, to pursue additional diagnostic testing, and the timing of discharge. Of the respondents, 61.0% agreed that standardized assessment of dyspnea should be part of the vital signs, and 64.6% agreed that awareness of dyspnea severity influences their decision to prescribe opioids. Hospitalists who appreciated the importance of dyspnea in clinical practice were more likely to support the implementation of a standardized scale. CONCLUSIONS: Most hospitalists believe that routine assessment of dyspnea severity would enhance their clinical decision making and patient care. Measurement and documentation of dyspnea severity may represent an opportunity to improve dyspnea management.
BACKGROUND:Dyspnea is a common symptom in patients hospitalized with acute cardiopulmonary diseases. Routine assessment of dyspnea severity is recommended by clinical guidelines based on the evidence that patients are not treated consistently for dyspnea relief. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate attitudes and beliefs of hospitalists regarding the assessment and management of dyspnea. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTINGS: Nine hospitals in the United States. MEASUREMENTS: Survey questions assessed the following domains regarding dyspnea: importance in clinical care, potential benefits and challenges of implementing a standardized assessment, current approaches to assessment, and how awareness of severity affects management. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the respondent's level of agreement; strongly agree and agree were combined into a single category. RESULTS: Of the 255 hospitalists invited to participate, 69.8% completed the survey; 77.0% agreed that dyspnea relief is an important goal when treating patients with cardiopulmonary conditions. Approximately 90% of respondents stated that awareness of dyspnea severity influences their decision to intensify treatment, to pursue additional diagnostic testing, and the timing of discharge. Of the respondents, 61.0% agreed that standardized assessment of dyspnea should be part of the vital signs, and 64.6% agreed that awareness of dyspnea severity influences their decision to prescribe opioids. Hospitalists who appreciated the importance of dyspnea in clinical practice were more likely to support the implementation of a standardized scale. CONCLUSIONS: Most hospitalists believe that routine assessment of dyspnea severity would enhance their clinical decision making and patient care. Measurement and documentation of dyspnea severity may represent an opportunity to improve dyspnea management.
Authors: Darcy D Marciniuk; Donna Goodridge; Paul Hernandez; Graeme Rocker; Meyer Balter; Pat Bailey; Gord Ford; Jean Bourbeau; Denis E O'Donnell; Francois Maltais; Richard A Mularski; Andrew J Cave; Irvin Mayers; Vicki Kennedy; Thomas K Oliver; Candice Brown Journal: Can Respir J Date: 2011 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: Robert B Banzett; Lewis Adams; Carl R O'Donnell; Sean A Gilman; Robert W Lansing; Richard M Schwartzstein Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kylie N Johnston; Mary Young; Debra Kay; Sara Booth; Anna Spathis; Marie T Williams Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 2.463