Raul Gonzalez1, Randi M Schuster2, Robin M Mermelstein3, Kathleen R Diviak4. 1. Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, 11200 SW 8th St, Miami, FL 33199, United States; Center for Children and Families, Florida International University, Miami, 11200 SW 8th St, Miami, FL 33199, United States. Electronic address: raul.gonzalezjr@fiu.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, United States. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, 1200 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL 60607, United States; Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, 1747 W Roosevelt Rd, Chicago, IL 60608, United States. 4. Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, 1747 W Roosevelt Rd, Chicago, IL 60608, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deficits in decision-making and episodic memory are often reported among heavy cannabis users, yet little is known on how they influence negative consequences from cannabis use. Individual differences in decision-making may explain, in part, why some individuals experience significant problems from their cannabis use whereas others do not. We hypothesized that poor decision-making would moderate relationships between amount of cannabis use and problems from cannabis use whereas episodic memory performance would not. METHOD: Young adult cannabis users (n=52) with cannabis as their drug of choice and with minimal comorbidities completed semi-structured interviews, self-report questionnaires, and measures of neurocognitive functioning, with decision-making accessed via the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), episodic memory via the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT) and problems from cannabis use with the Marijuana Problems Scale. RESULTS: Strong relationships were observed between amount of cannabis use (lifetime, 12-month, and 30-day) and problems reported from use, but only among participants with low (impaired) decision-making (R(2)=.39 to .51; p<.01). No significant relationships were observed among those with better (low average to high average) decision-making performance (p>.05). In contrast, episodic memory performance was not a significant moderator of the relationship between amount of cannabis use and cannabis problems (p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis users with poor decision-making may be at greater risk for experiencing significant negative consequences from their cannabis use. Our results lend further support to emerging evidence of decision-making as a risk factor for addiction and extend these findings to cannabis users.
BACKGROUND: Deficits in decision-making and episodic memory are often reported among heavy cannabis users, yet little is known on how they influence negative consequences from cannabis use. Individual differences in decision-making may explain, in part, why some individuals experience significant problems from their cannabis use whereas others do not. We hypothesized that poor decision-making would moderate relationships between amount of cannabis use and problems from cannabis use whereas episodic memory performance would not. METHOD: Young adult cannabis users (n=52) with cannabis as their drug of choice and with minimal comorbidities completed semi-structured interviews, self-report questionnaires, and measures of neurocognitive functioning, with decision-making accessed via the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), episodic memory via the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT) and problems from cannabis use with the Marijuana Problems Scale. RESULTS: Strong relationships were observed between amount of cannabis use (lifetime, 12-month, and 30-day) and problems reported from use, but only among participants with low (impaired) decision-making (R(2)=.39 to .51; p<.01). No significant relationships were observed among those with better (low average to high average) decision-making performance (p>.05). In contrast, episodic memory performance was not a significant moderator of the relationship between amount of cannabis use and cannabis problems (p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis users with poor decision-making may be at greater risk for experiencing significant negative consequences from their cannabis use. Our results lend further support to emerging evidence of decision-making as a risk factor for addiction and extend these findings to cannabis users.
Authors: J N Giedd; J Blumenthal; N O Jeffries; F X Castellanos; H Liu; A Zijdenbos; T Paus; A C Evans; J L Rapoport Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: José P Alfonso; Alfonso Caracuel; Luis C Delgado-Pastor; Antonio Verdejo-García Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Ralph E Tarter; Levent Kirisci; Ada Mezzich; Jack R Cornelius; Kathleen Pajer; Michael Vanyukov; William Gardner; Timothy Blackson; Duncan Clark Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Robert S Stephens; Roger A Roffman; Stephanie A Fearer; Carl Williams; Joseph F Picciano; Randy S Burke Journal: Addiction Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Melissa A Lewis; Dana M Litt; Kevin M King; Tracey A Garcia; Katja A Waldron; Christine M Lee Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: April D Thames; Taylor P Kuhn; Timothy J Williamson; Jacob D Jones; Zanjbeel Mahmood; Andrea Hammond Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Angela J Langdon; Brett A Hathaway; Samuel Zorowitz; Cailean B W Harris; Catharine A Winstanley Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2019-06-29 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Caitlin A Orsini; Caesar M Hernandez; Sarthak Singhal; Kyle B Kelly; Charles J Frazier; Jennifer L Bizon; Barry Setlow Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 6.167