Literature DB >> 26198706

Preexisting severe cervical spinal cord compression is a significant risk factor for severe paralysis development in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without bone injury: a retrospective cohort study.

Takeshi Oichi1,2, Yasushi Oshima3, Rentaro Okazaki4, Seiichi Azuma4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to investigate whether preexisting severe cervical spinal cord compression affects the severity of paralysis once patients develop traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without bone injury.
METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 122 consecutive patients with traumatic CSCI without bone injury. The severity of paralysis on admission was assessed by the American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale (AIS). The degree of preexisting cervical spinal cord compression was evaluated by the maximum spinal cord compression (MSCC) and was divided into three categories: minor compression (MSCC ≤ 20 %), moderate compression (20 % < MSCC ≤ 40 %), and severe compression (40 % < MSCC). We investigated soft-tissue damage on magnetic resonance imaging to estimate the external force applied. Other potential risk factors, including age, sex, fused vertebra, and ossification of longitudinal ligament, were also reviewed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the risk factors for developing severe paralysis (AIS A-C) on admission.
RESULTS: Our study included 103 males and 19 females with mean age of 65 years. Sixty-one patients showed severe paralysis (AIS A-C) on admission. The average MSCC was 22 %. Moderate compression was observed in 41, and severe in 20. Soft-tissue damage was observed in 91. A multivariate analysis showed that severe cervical spinal cord compression significantly affected the severity of paralysis at the time of injury, whereas both mild and moderate compression did not affect it. Soft-tissue damage was also significantly associated with severe paralysis on admission.
CONCLUSIONS: Preexisting severe cervical cord compression is an independent risk factor for severe paralysis once patients develop traumatic CSCI without bone injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spinal cord compression; Cervical spine; Fused vertebra; Soft tissue damage; Spinal cord injury

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26198706     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4142-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  Can magnetic resonance imaging reflect the prognosis in patients of cervical spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality?

Authors:  Masaaki Machino; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Hiroaki Nakashima; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Traumatic spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Wagih Shafik El Masri; Naveen Kumar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Influence of spinal cord compression and traumatic force on the severity of cervical spinal cord injury associated with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Osamu Kawano; Takeshi Maeda; Eiji Mori; Itaru Yugue; Tsuneaki Takao; Hiroaki Sakai; Takayoshi Ueta; Keiichiro Shiba
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Acute cervical cord injury without fracture or dislocation of the spinal column.

Authors:  I Koyanagi; Y Iwasaki; K Hida; M Akino; H Imamura; H Abe
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  MRI findings in patients with a cervical spinal cord injury who do not show radiographic evidence of a fracture or dislocation.

Authors:  K Hayashi; K Yone; H Ito; M Yanase; T Sakou
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1995-04

6.  Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome--prospective study with 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Firoz Miyanji; Julio C Furlan; Bizhan Aarabi; Paul M Arnold; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Part I: An evidence-based analysis of the published literature.

Authors:  S C Rao; M G Fehlings
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Acute cervical spinal cord injury complicated by preexisting ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Hirotaka Chikuda; Atsushi Seichi; Katsushi Takeshita; Shunji Matsunaga; Masahiko Watanabe; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Kazuya Oshima; Yutaka Sasao; Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Shinnosuke Nakahara; Kenji Endo; Kenzo Uchida; Masahiko Takahata; Toru Yokoyama; Kei Yamada; Yutaka Nohara; Shiro Imagama; Hideo Hosoe; Hiroshi Ohtsu; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Does ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament affect the neurological outcome after traumatic cervical cord injury?

Authors:  Seiji Okada; Takeshi Maeda; Yasuyuki Ohkawa; Katsumi Harimaya; Hirokazu Saiwai; Hiromi Kumamaru; Yoshihiro Matsumoto; Toshio Doi; Takayoshi Ueta; Keiichiro Shiba; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Predicting the risk and severity of acute spinal cord injury after a minor trauma to the cervical spine.

Authors:  Nikolaus Aebli; Tabea B Rüegg; Anina G Wicki; Nassos Petrou; Jörg Krebs
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  6 in total

1.  A prospective serial MRI study following acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Joost P H J Rutges; Brian K Kwon; Manraj Heran; Tamir Ailon; John T Street; Marcel F Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Promotion of neuronal regeneration by using self-polymerized dendritic polypeptide scaffold for spinal cord tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jun Ming Wan; Liang le Liu; Jian Fang Zhang; Jian Wei Lu; Qi Li
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Clinical outcomes of late decompression surgery following cervical spinal cord injury with pre-existing cord compression.

Authors:  Tsunehiko Konomi; Akimasa Yasuda; Kanehiro Fujiyoshi; Junichi Yamane; Shinjiro Kaneko; Takatsugu Komiyama; Masakazu Takemitsu; Yoshiyuki Yato; Osahiko Tsuji; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Takashi Asazuma
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Substantial Atrophy of the Psoas Muscle as Late Sequela of L2 Osteoporotic Fracture: a Case Report.

Authors:  Kalliopi Alpantaki; Aikaterini Tsatsaragkou; Konstantinos Vlasis; Nikolaos Achilleas Arkoudis; Konstantinos Raptis; Christos Koutserimpas
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2021-12

5.  Particular precautions and the role of intraoperative neuromonitoring in cervical cord injury in elder recreational cyclist: A case report.

Authors:  Ifran Saleh; Didik Librianto; Achmad Fauzi Kamal; Fachrisal Ipang; Wahyu Widodo; Dina Aprilya
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-07

6.  The biomechanical effect of preexisting different types of disc herniation in cervical hyperextension injury.

Authors:  Jian-Jie Wang; Meng-Lei Xu; Hui-Zi Zeng; Liang-Dong Zheng; Shi-Jie Zhu; Chen Jin; Zhi-Li Zeng; Li-Ming Cheng; Rui Zhu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.