| Literature DB >> 26198096 |
Arturo Roca-Rivada1, Susana Belen Bravo2, Diego Pérez-Sotelo3, Jana Alonso2, Ana Isabel Castro4, Iván Baamonde5, Javier Baltar5, Felipe F Casanueva4, María Pardo1.
Abstract
In the context of obesity, strong evidences support a distinctive pathological contribution of adipose tissue depending on its anatomical site of accumulation. Therefore, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) has been lately considered metabolically benign compared to visceral fat (VAT), whose location is associated to the risk of developing cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance, and other associated comorbidities. Under the above situation, the chronic local inflammation that characterizes obese adipose tissue, has acquired a major role on the pathogenesis of obesity. In this work, we have analyzed for the first time human obese VAT and SAT secretomes using an improved quantitative proteomic approach for the study of tissue secretomes, Comparison of Isotope-Labeled Amino acid Incorporation Rates (CILAIR). The use of double isotope-labeling-CILAIR approach to analyze VAT and SAT secretomes allowed the identification of location-specific secreted proteins and its differential secretion. Additionally to the very high percentage of identified proteins previously implicated in obesity or in its comorbidities, this approach was revealed as a useful tool for the study of the obese adipose tissue microenvironment including extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling and inflammatory status. The results herein presented reinforce the fact that VAT and SAT depots have distinct features and contribute differentially to metabolic disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26198096 PMCID: PMC4648467 DOI: 10.1038/srep12214
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Experimental workflow.
VAT and SAT explants from 3 independent obese patients were extensively washed and minced in equal weight fragments. After incubation with Lys/Arg free media for 26 hours, samples were labeled with 70 mg/liter of L-[13C6]-Lys and L-[13C6, 15N4]-Arg for 72 hours. Labeled secretomes were collected, concentrated and quantified; then, equal amount of proteins were loaded in a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and run until a single band entered the resolving gel 3 mm. This unique band was processed for in gel digestion followed by LC-MS/MS. Proteins were identified and heavy/light ratios were determined resulting in three different data sets for VAT and SAT. Overlap data from VAT and SAT of the same patient was determined and the fold-change values calculated for each protein by dividing their VAT heavy/light ratios in relation to SAT.
Figure 2Double isotope-labeled amino acid incorporation in secretomes from VAT and SAT explants.
The number of total labeled peptides in VAT and SAT in relation to total identified peptides after a 72 hours labeling period is represented in histograms (A). The number of peptides labeled with Lys (K), Arg (R), or different combinations of isotope-labeled amino acids (K+R, R+R and K+K) is shown for VAT and SAT (B). Labeled amino acid incorporation efficiency is represented as percentage of labeled peptides in VAT and SAT.
Common labeled proteins detected in VAT and SAT obese secretomes.
Labeled proteins detected exclusively in VAT obese secretome.
| P39060 | Collagen alpha-1(XVIII) chain (COL18A1) | SP | 0.31 |
| P08572 | Collagen alpha-2(IV) chain (COL4A2) | SP | 1.08 |
| P00751 | Complement factor B (CFB) | SP | 3.74 |
| P01034 | Cystatin-C (CST3) | SP | 3.10 |
| Q08380 | Galectin-3-binding protein (LGALS3BP) | SP | 2.84 |
| Q14112 | Nidogen-2 (NID2) | SP | 0.99 |
| Q15063 | Periostin (POSTN) | SP | 0.98 |
| P36955 | Pigment epithelium-derived factor (SERPINF1) | SP | 5.61 |
SecretP: secretome P score, SP: Signal Peptide, MEAN: average heavy/light incorporation ratio.
Labeled proteins detected exclusively in SAT obese secretome.
| P01009 | Alpha-1-antitrypsin (SERPINA 1) | SP | 0.22 |
| P17931 | Galectin-3 (LGALS3) | 0.77 | 1.66 |
| P08254 | Stromelysin-1 (MMP3) | SP | 6.11 |
SecretP: secretome P score, SP: Signal Peptide, MEAN: average heavy/light incorporation ratio.
Figure 3Functional analysis.
All labeled proteins identified in obese VAT and SAT secretomes were submitted to FunRich functional analysis tool as indicated in the methods section. Cellular component classification of all VAT and SAT secreted proteins are shown (A). Comparison of proteins oversecreted in VAT vs SAT regarding biological pathways classification is illustrated (B). The categorization in terms of biological process of oversecreted proteins in VAT (C) and SAT (D) independently is also represented.
Figure 4Validation of selected proteins.
Independent obese and healthy secretome samples from VAT and SAT depots were assayed by immunoblotting. C3 protein detection cropped image and histogram graph from band quantification is shown (A); TIMP-1 representative cropped image of 1-DE immunodetection of healthy and obese VAT and SAT secretomes (B); and 2-DE representative cropped western blots showing post-translational variants secreted by VAT and SAT from healthy and obese individuals (C). VAT: visceral adipose tissue; SAT: subcutaneous adipose tissue. Statistical significance is represented as *p < 0.05.