Banu Terzi1, Nurten Kaya2. 1. Health School, Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey. 2. Health Sciences Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The process of admission to an ICU may have a negative impact on a patient's physiological parameters and comfort. AIM: To determine the effect of providing a patient admission protocol on patients' comfort and physiological parameters prior to admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: A randomized, controlled experimental study. METHODS: This study included 100 (50 control, 50 experimental) patients who experienced planned admissions to the ICU of a University Hospital. Standard forms were used to record patient information, evaluations and comfort. Data were collected from patients prior to, during and 24 h after admission to the ICU and 24 h after being transferred. The experimental group was admitted to the ICU using the patient admission protocol and the control group underwent routine admittance. FINDINGS: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the individual characteristics, physiology and comfort prior to, during or 24 h after admission to the ICU (p > 0·05). However, 24 h after being transferred, the experimental group's comfort was significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0·01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the patient admission protocol does not affect the physiological parameters of patients; however, it does raise the comfort level of patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The patient admission protocol specific to the institution (in this context, a unit introductory booklet) should be developed in ICUs. We suggest that admission to the ICU should be carried out in accordance with this protocol.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The process of admission to an ICU may have a negative impact on a patient's physiological parameters and comfort. AIM: To determine the effect of providing a patient admission protocol on patients' comfort and physiological parameters prior to admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: A randomized, controlled experimental study. METHODS: This study included 100 (50 control, 50 experimental) patients who experienced planned admissions to the ICU of a University Hospital. Standard forms were used to record patient information, evaluations and comfort. Data were collected from patients prior to, during and 24 h after admission to the ICU and 24 h after being transferred. The experimental group was admitted to the ICU using the patient admission protocol and the control group underwent routine admittance. FINDINGS: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the individual characteristics, physiology and comfort prior to, during or 24 h after admission to the ICU (p > 0·05). However, 24 h after being transferred, the experimental group's comfort was significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0·01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the patient admission protocol does not affect the physiological parameters of patients; however, it does raise the comfort level of patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The patient admission protocol specific to the institution (in this context, a unit introductory booklet) should be developed in ICUs. We suggest that admission to the ICU should be carried out in accordance with this protocol.