Literature DB >> 26197373

The Surgical Care Improvement Project Antibiotic Guidelines: Should We Expect More Than Good Intentions?

Robert B Schonberger1, Paul G Barash, Robert S Lagasse.   

Abstract

Since 2006, the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) has promoted 3 perioperative antibiotic recommendations designed to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections. Despite good evidence for the efficacy of these recommendations, the efforts of SCIP have not measurably improved the rates of surgical site infections. We offer 3 arguments as to why SCIP has fallen short of expectations. We then suggest a reorientation of quality improvement efforts to focus less on reporting, and incentivizing adherence to imperfect metrics, and more on creating local and regional quality collaboratives to educate clinicians about how to improve practice. Ultimately, successful quality improvement projects are behavioral interventions that will only succeed to the degree that they motivate individual clinicians, practicing within a particular context, to do the difficult work of identifying failures and iteratively working toward excellence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26197373      PMCID: PMC4510848          DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  45 in total

1.  Gauging the impact of statins using number needed to treat.

Authors:  C R Kumana; B M Cheung; I J Lauder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A founder of quality assessment encounters a troubled system firsthand. Interview by Fitzhugh Mullan.

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  A System for Anesthesia Drug Administration Using Barcode Technology: The Codonics Safe Label System and Smart Anesthesia Manager.

Authors:  Srdjan Jelacic; Andrew Bowdle; Bala G Nair; Dolly Kusulos; Lynnette Bower; Kei Togashi
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Virtual quality: the failure of public reporting and pay-for-performance programs.

Authors:  Lara Goitein
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Restoring trust in VA health care.

Authors:  Kenneth W Kizer; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Variation in surgical quality measure adherence within hospital referral regions: do publicly reported surgical quality measures distinguish among hospitals that patients are likely to compare?

Authors:  Kyan C Safavi; Feng Dai; Todd A Gilbertsen; Robert B Schonberger
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Preoperative β-blocker use in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: national database analysis.

Authors:  William Brinkman; Morley A Herbert; Sean O'Brien; Giovanni Filardo; Syma Prince; Todd Dewey; Mitchell Magee; William Ryan; Michael Mack
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  A statewide colectomy experience: the role of full bowel preparation in preventing surgical site infection.

Authors:  Edward K Kim; Kyle H Sheetz; Julie Bonn; Scott DeRoo; Christopher Lee; Isaac Stein; Arya Zarinsefat; Shijie Cai; Darrell A Campbell; Michael J Englesbe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Does winning a pay-for-performance bonus improve subsequent quality performance? Evidence from the Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration.

Authors:  Andrew Ryan; Matthew Sutton; Tim Doran
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Long-term effect of hospital pay for performance on mortality in England.

Authors:  Søren Rud Kristensen; Rachel Meacock; Alex J Turner; Ruth Boaden; Ruth McDonald; Martin Roland; Matthew Sutton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Recent Anti-Microbial Exposure Is Associated with More Complications after Elective Surgery.

Authors:  Christopher A Guidry; Puja M Shah; Zachary C Dietch; Nathan R Elwood; Elizabeth D Krebs; J Hunter Mehaffey; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.150

2.  Patient satisfaction survey scores are not an appropriate metric to differentiate performance among anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Robert E Freundlich; Gen Li; Brendan Grant; Paul St Jacques; Warren S Sandberg; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Matthew S Shotwell; Jonathan P Wanderer
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 9.452

3.  Is There a Difference in Infection Risk Between Single and Multiple Doses of Prophylactic Antibiotics? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sean P Ryan; Beau J Kildow; Timothy L Tan; Javad Parvizi; Michael P Bolognesi; Thorsten M Seyler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Perioperative Information Systems: Opportunities to Improve Delivery of Care and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac and Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Robert E Freundlich; Jesse M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Subscapularis-Sparing Rotator Interval Approach for Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  David P Adkison; Parke W Hudson; James V Worthen; Andrew S Moon; Martim C Pinto; Amit Momaya; Brent A Ponce; Eugene W Brabston
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-11-26

6.  An Audit of Perioperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis: Compliance with the International Guidelines.

Authors:  Sarah Mousavi; Elham Zamani; Faranak Bahrami
Journal:  J Res Pharm Pract       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.