Literature DB >> 26196967

Differential use of sensory information in sexual behavior as a function of gender.

R S Herz1, E D Cahill2.   

Abstract

Olfactory information is critical to mammalian sexual behavior. Based on parental investment theory the relative importance of olfaction compared with vision, touch, and hearing should be different for human males and females. In particular, because of its link to immunological profile and offspring viability, odor should be a more important determinant of sexual choice and arousal for females than for males. To test this hypothesis a questionnaire was developed and administered to 332 adults (166 males, 166 females). Subjects used a 1-7 scale to indicate how much they agreed with a series of statements concerning the importance of olfactory, visual, auditory, and tactile information for their sexual responsivity. The data reveal that males rated visual and olfactory information as being equally important for selecting a lover, while females considered olfactory information to be the single most important variable in mate choice. Additionally, when considering sexual activity, females singled out body odor from all other sensory experiences as most able to negatively affect desire, while males regarded odors as much more neutral stimuli for sexual arousal. The present results support recent findings in mice and humans concerning the relation of female preferences in body odor and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) compatibility and can be explained by an evolutionary analysis of sex differences in reproductive strategies. This work represents the first direct examination of the role of different forms of sensory information in human sexual behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evolutionary principles; Gender differences; Odor; Sensory information; Sexual behavior

Year:  1997        PMID: 26196967     DOI: 10.1007/BF02912495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  13 in total

1.  Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype.

Authors:  W K Potts; C J Manning; E K Wakeland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Probabilistic assessment of the HLA sharing of recurrent spontaneous abortion couples in the Japanese population.

Authors:  M Koyama; F Saji; S Takahashi; M Takemura; Y Samejima; T Kameda; T Kimura; O Tanizawa
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  1991-05

3.  Right-hand superiority for throwing but not for intercepting.

Authors:  N V Watson; D Kimura
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Sharing of human leukocyte antigens in primary and secondary recurrent spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  H N Ho; T J Gill; R P Nsieh; H J Hsieh; T Y Lee
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.

Authors:  D M Buss; D P Schmitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  HLA sharing and spontaneous abortion in humans.

Authors:  M L Thomas; J H Harger; D K Wagener; B S Rabin; T J Gill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-04-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans.

Authors:  C Wedekind; T Seebeck; F Bettens; A J Paepke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Human leukocyte antigen compatibility and failure to achieve a viable pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  L N Weckstein; P Patrizio; J P Balmaceda; R H Asch; D W Branch
Journal:  Acta Eur Fertil       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr

9.  Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; E A Boyse; V Miké; H T Thaler; B J Mathieson; J Abbott; J Boyse; Z A Zayas; L Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1976-11-02       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Recognition among mice. Evidence from the use of a Y-maze differentially scented by congenic mice of different major histocompatibility types.

Authors:  K Yamazaki; M Yamaguchi; L Baranoski; J Bard; E A Boyse; L Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1979-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  The neural basis of sex differences in sexual behavior: A quantitative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timm B Poeppl; Berthold Langguth; Rainer Rupprecht; Adam Safron; Danilo Bzdok; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 8.606

Review 2.  Functional neuronal processing of human body odors.

Authors:  Johan N Lundström; Mats J Olsson
Journal:  Vitam Horm       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Sensory Dysfunction and Sexuality in the U.S. Population of Older Adults.

Authors:  Selena Zhong; Jayant M Pinto; Kristen E Wroblewski; Martha K McClintock
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Olfactory sexual inhibition and the westermarck effect.

Authors:  M A Schneider; L Hendrix
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2000-03

5.  Sniffing of Body Odors and Individual Significance of Olfaction Are Associated with Sexual Desire: A Cross-Cultural Study in China, India, and the USA.

Authors:  Zi-Lin Li; Thomas Hummel; Lai-Quan Zou
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-08-23

6.  A gender difference related to the effect of a background odor: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Peter Walla; Herwig Imhof; Wilfried Lang
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Characteristics of chemosensory disorders--results from a survey.

Authors:  Christos Merkonidis; Franz Grosse; Timomi Ninh; Cornelia Hummel; Antje Haehner; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Olfaction Is Associated With Sexual Motivation and Satisfaction in Older Men and Women.

Authors:  Jesse K Siegel; Sunny Y Kung; Kristen E Wroblewski; David W Kern; Martha K McClintock; Jayant M Pinto
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Genetic variation in the odorant receptors family 13 and the mhc loci influence mate selection in a multiple sclerosis dataset.

Authors:  Pouya Khankhanian; Pierre-Antoine Gourraud; Stacy J Caillier; Adam Santaniello; Stephen L Hauser; Sergio E Baranzini; Jorge R Oksenberg
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Psychology of fragrance use: perception of individual odor and perfume blends reveals a mechanism for idiosyncratic effects on fragrance choice.

Authors:  Pavlína Lenochová; Pavla Vohnoutová; S Craig Roberts; Elisabeth Oberzaucher; Karl Grammer; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.