PURPOSE: We compared the flow characteristics of novel three-dimensional (3D) printed ureteral stents with four conventional double-pigtail stents in an ex vivo porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In six ex vivo porcine urinary systems with kidneys and ureters intact, we deployed a 5F occlusion catheter in an interpolar calix. We tested each system with antegrade irrigation with a 0.9% saline bag placed 35 cm above the renal pelvis. We evaluated four standard stents (6F Universa® Soft, 7F Percuflex,™ 7/10F Applied Endopyelotomy, 8.5F Filiform Double Pigtail) and compared them with a 9F 3D printed prototype stent. For each stent, we measured the total, extraluminal, and intraluminal flow rates. RESULTS: The mean total flow rates for 3D printed stents were significantly higher than the 6F, 7F, and 7/10F stents (P<0.05). No significant difference was seen in the total flow rate for the 3D printed stent and the 8.5F stent. The mean extraluminal flow rates for the 3D stents were similar to those of 7F stents, but significantly lower than 6F stents (P<0.001) and 8.5F stents (P<0.05) and higher than 7/10F stents (P<0.001). The mean intraluminal flow rates for the 3D printed stents were significantly higher than the 6F, 7F, 7/10F, and 8.5F stents (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, 3D printed stents manifested a mean total flow rate comparable to the flow rates of contemporary stents. Continued advances in technology and material may permit functionally feasible 3D printed ureteral stents.
PURPOSE: We compared the flow characteristics of novel three-dimensional (3D) printed ureteral stents with four conventional double-pigtail stents in an ex vivo porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In six ex vivo porcine urinary systems with kidneys and ureters intact, we deployed a 5F occlusion catheter in an interpolar calix. We tested each system with antegrade irrigation with a 0.9% saline bag placed 35 cm above the renal pelvis. We evaluated four standard stents (6F Universa® Soft, 7F Percuflex,™ 7/10F Applied Endopyelotomy, 8.5F Filiform Double Pigtail) and compared them with a 9F 3D printed prototype stent. For each stent, we measured the total, extraluminal, and intraluminal flow rates. RESULTS: The mean total flow rates for 3D printed stents were significantly higher than the 6F, 7F, and 7/10F stents (P<0.05). No significant difference was seen in the total flow rate for the 3D printed stent and the 8.5F stent. The mean extraluminal flow rates for the 3D stents were similar to those of 7F stents, but significantly lower than 6F stents (P<0.001) and 8.5F stents (P<0.05) and higher than 7/10F stents (P<0.001). The mean intraluminal flow rates for the 3D printed stents were significantly higher than the 6F, 7F, 7/10F, and 8.5F stents (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, 3D printed stents manifested a mean total flow rate comparable to the flow rates of contemporary stents. Continued advances in technology and material may permit functionally feasible 3D printed ureteral stents.
Authors: Todd G Manning; Jonathan S O'Brien; Daniel Christidis; Marlon Perera; Jasamine Coles-Black; Jason Chuen; Damien M Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 4.226