Cesare Cuspidi1, Rita Facchetti, Michele Bombelli, Carla Sala, Marijana Tadic, Guido Grassi, Giuseppe Mancia. 1. aDepartment of Health Science, University of Milano-Bicocca bIstituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS cDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health University of Milano and Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy dUniversity Clinical Hospital Centre 'Dragisa Misovic', Belgrade, Serbia eIRCCS Multimedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
AIM: We estimated the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality associated with left ventricular geometric patterns, as defined by a new classification system proposed by the Dallas Heart Study, in 1716 representatives of the general population of Monza enrolled in the Pressioni Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study. METHODS: Cut-points for abnormal left ventricular geometric patterns were derived from reference values of the healthy fraction of the PAMELA population by combining left ventricular mass (LVM) index, left ventricular diameter and relative wall thickness. Death certificates were collected over an average 211 months follow-up period. RESULTS: During follow-up, 89 fatal cardiovascular events and 264 all-cause deaths were recorded. Concentric remodelling was the most common left ventricular geometric abnormality (9.4%) followed by eccentric nondilated left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (6.3%), concentric LVH (4.6%) and eccentric dilated LVH (3.5%). Compared with normal left ventricular geometry, concentric LVH [hazard ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.44-3.37, P < 0.0003], eccentric dilated LVH (hazard ratio 1.90, 95% CI 1.17-3.08, P = 0.009) and eccentric nondilated LVH (hazard ratio 1.57, 95% CI 1.07-2.31, P = 0.02) predicted the risk of cardiovascular mortality, after adjustment for baseline covariates, including ambulatory blood pressure. Similar findings were observed for all-cause mortality. Only concentric LVH maintained a significant prognostic value for both outcomes after adjustment for baseline differences in LVM index. CONCLUSION: The new classification system of left ventricular geometric patterns may improve mortality risk stratification in a general population. The risk is markedly dependent on LVM values; only concentric LVH provides a prognostic information beyond that conveyed by cardiac mass.
AIM: We estimated the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality associated with left ventricular geometric patterns, as defined by a new classification system proposed by the Dallas Heart Study, in 1716 representatives of the general population of Monza enrolled in the Pressioni Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study. METHODS: Cut-points for abnormal left ventricular geometric patterns were derived from reference values of the healthy fraction of the PAMELA population by combining left ventricular mass (LVM) index, left ventricular diameter and relative wall thickness. Death certificates were collected over an average 211 months follow-up period. RESULTS: During follow-up, 89 fatal cardiovascular events and 264 all-cause deaths were recorded. Concentric remodelling was the most common left ventricular geometric abnormality (9.4%) followed by eccentric nondilated left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (6.3%), concentric LVH (4.6%) and eccentric dilated LVH (3.5%). Compared with normal left ventricular geometry, concentric LVH [hazard ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.44-3.37, P < 0.0003], eccentric dilated LVH (hazard ratio 1.90, 95% CI 1.17-3.08, P = 0.009) and eccentric nondilated LVH (hazard ratio 1.57, 95% CI 1.07-2.31, P = 0.02) predicted the risk of cardiovascular mortality, after adjustment for baseline covariates, including ambulatory blood pressure. Similar findings were observed for all-cause mortality. Only concentric LVH maintained a significant prognostic value for both outcomes after adjustment for baseline differences in LVM index. CONCLUSION: The new classification system of left ventricular geometric patterns may improve mortality risk stratification in a general population. The risk is markedly dependent on LVM values; only concentric LVH provides a prognostic information beyond that conveyed by cardiac mass.
Authors: Sripal Bangalore; David J Maron; Harmony R Reynolds; Gregg W Stone; Sean M O'Brien; Karen P Alexander; Judith S Hochman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2018-05
Authors: Andrea Barbieri; Alessandro Albini; Anna Maisano; Gerardo De Mitri; Giovanni Camaioni; Niccolò Bonini; Francesca Mantovani; Giuseppe Boriani Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-04-27
Authors: Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Richard Kronmal; John Eng; Aaron Folsom; Gregory Burke; J Jeffrey Carr; Steven Shea; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 29.146
Authors: Giacomo Zoppini; Corinna Bergamini; Stefano Bonapace; Maddalena Trombetta; Alessandro Mantovani; Anna Toffalini; Laura Lanzoni; Lorenzo Bertolini; Luciano Zenari; Enzo Bonora; Giovanni Targher; Andrea Rossi Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2018-06-14
Authors: Jan Szewieczek; Zbigniew Gąsior; Jan Duława; Tomasz Francuz; Katarzyna Legierska; Agnieszka Batko-Szwaczka; Beata Hornik; Magdalena Janusz-Jenczeń; Iwona Włodarczyk; Krzysztof Wilczyński Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2016-04-02