INTRODUCTION: In the context of an increasing number of multi-centric studies providing data from different sites and sources the necessity for central data management (CDM) becomes undeniable. This is exacerbated by a multiplicity of featured data types, formats and interfaces. In relation to methodological medical research the definition of central data management needs to be broadened beyond the simple storage and archiving of research data. OBJECTIVES: This paper highlights typical requirements of CDM for cohort studies and registries and illustrates how orientation for CDM can be provided by addressing selected data management challenges. METHODS: Therefore in the first part of this paper a short review summarises technical, organisational and legal challenges for CDM in cohort studies and registries. A deduced set of typical requirements of CDM in epidemiological research follows. RESULTS: In the second part the MOSAIC project is introduced (a modular systematic approach to implement CDM). The modular nature of MOSAIC contributes to manage both technical and organisational challenges efficiently by providing practical tools. A short presentation of a first set of tools, aiming for selected CDM requirements in cohort studies and registries, comprises a template for comprehensive documentation of data protection measures, an interactive reference portal for gaining insights and sharing experiences, supplemented by modular software tools for generation and management of generic pseudonyms, for participant management and for sophisticated consent management. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, work within MOSAIC addresses existing challenges in epidemiological research in the context of CDM and facilitates the standardized collection of data with pre-programmed modules and provided document templates. The necessary effort for in-house programming is reduced, which accelerates the start of data collection.
INTRODUCTION: In the context of an increasing number of multi-centric studies providing data from different sites and sources the necessity for central data management (CDM) becomes undeniable. This is exacerbated by a multiplicity of featured data types, formats and interfaces. In relation to methodological medical research the definition of central data management needs to be broadened beyond the simple storage and archiving of research data. OBJECTIVES: This paper highlights typical requirements of CDM for cohort studies and registries and illustrates how orientation for CDM can be provided by addressing selected data management challenges. METHODS: Therefore in the first part of this paper a short review summarises technical, organisational and legal challenges for CDM in cohort studies and registries. A deduced set of typical requirements of CDM in epidemiological research follows. RESULTS: In the second part the MOSAIC project is introduced (a modular systematic approach to implement CDM). The modular nature of MOSAIC contributes to manage both technical and organisational challenges efficiently by providing practical tools. A short presentation of a first set of tools, aiming for selected CDM requirements in cohort studies and registries, comprises a template for comprehensive documentation of data protection measures, an interactive reference portal for gaining insights and sharing experiences, supplemented by modular software tools for generation and management of generic pseudonyms, for participant management and for sophisticated consent management. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, work within MOSAIC addresses existing challenges in epidemiological research in the context of CDM and facilitates the standardized collection of data with pre-programmed modules and provided document templates. The necessary effort for in-house programming is reduced, which accelerates the start of data collection.
Entities:
Keywords:
Medical data management; data privacy protection; informed consent; pseudonyms; record linkage
Authors: Thea Schwaneberg; Kerstin Weitmann; Andreas Dösch; Claudia Seyler; Thomas Bahls; Lars Geidel; Dana Stahl; Mahsa Lee; Monika Kraus; Hugo A Katus; Wolfgang Hoffmann Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2017-07-18
Authors: Henriette Rau; Lars Geidel; Martin Bialke; Arne Blumentritt; Martin Langanke; Wenke Liedtke; Sandra Pasewald; Dana Stahl; Thomas Bahls; Christian Maier; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Wolfgang Hoffmann Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Martin Bialke; Thomas Bahls; Lars Geidel; Henriette Rau; Arne Blumentritt; Sandra Pasewald; Robert Wolff; Jonas Steinmann; Tobias Bronsch; Björn Bergh; Galina Tremper; Martin Lablans; Frank Ückert; Stefan Lang; Tarik Idris; Wolfgang Hoffmann Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Thomas Bahls; Johannes Pung; Stephanie Heinemann; Johannes Hauswaldt; Iris Demmer; Arne Blumentritt; Henriette Rau; Johannes Drepper; Philipp Wieder; Roland Groh; Eva Hummers; Falk Schlegelmilch Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Martin Bialke; Henriette Rau; Oliver C Thamm; Ronny Schuldt; Peter Penndorf; Arne Blumentritt; Robert Gött; Jens Piegsa; Thomas Bahls; Wolfgang Hoffmann Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Till Acker; Johannes Bernarding; Harald Binder; Martin Boeker; Melanie Boerries; Philipp Daumke; Thomas Ganslandt; Jürgen Hesser; Gunther Höning; Michael Neumaier; Kurt Marquardt; Harald Renz; Hermann-Josef Rothkötter; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Paul Schmücker; Jürgen Schüttler; Martin Sedlmayr; Hubert Serve; Keywan Sohrabi; Holger Storf Journal: Methods Inf Med Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Christopher Hampf; Lars Geidel; Norman Zerbe; Martin Bialke; Dana Stahl; Arne Blumentritt; Thomas Bahls; Peter Hufnagl; Wolfgang Hoffmann Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Stefanie March; Silke Andrich; Johannes Drepper; Dirk Horenkamp-Sonntag; Andrea Icks; Peter Ihle; Joachim Kieschke; Bianca Kollhorst; Birga Maier; Ingo Meyer; Gabriele Müller; Christoph Ohlmeier; Dirk Peschke; Adrian Richter; Marie-Luise Rosenbusch; Nadine Scholten; Mandy Schulz; Christoph Stallmann; Enno Swart; Stefanie Wobbe-Ribinski; Antke Wolter; Jan Zeidler; Falk Hoffmann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 3.390