Howard E Jeffries1, Gerardo Soto-Campos, Aaron Katch, Christine Gall, Tom B Rice, Randall Wetzel. 1. 1Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA. 2Virtual PICU System, LLC, Los Angeles, CA. 3Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI. 4Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Comparison of clinical outcomes is imperative in the evaluation of healthcare quality. Risk adjustment for children undergoing cardiac surgery poses unique challenges, due to its distinct nature. We developed a risk-adjustment tool specifically focused on critical care mortality for the pediatric cardiac surgical population: the Pediatric Index of Cardiac Surgical Intensive care Mortality score. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected pediatric critical care data. SETTING: Pediatric critical care units in the United States. PATIENTS: Pediatric cardiac intensive care surgical patients. INTERVENTIONS: Prospectively collected data from consecutive patients admitted to ICUs were obtained from The Virtual PICU System (VPS, LLC, Los Angeles, CA), a national pediatric critical care database. Thirty-two candidate physiologic, demographic, and diagnostic variables were analyzed for inclusion in the development of the Pediatric Index of Cardiac Surgical Intensive care Mortality model. Multivariate logistic regression with stepwise selection was used to develop the model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 16,574 cardiac surgical patients from the 55 PICUs across the United States were included in the analysis. Thirteen variables remained in the final model, including the validated Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Congenital Heart Surgery Mortality (STAT) score and admission time with respect to cardiac surgery, which identifies whether the patient underwent the index surgical procedure before or after admission to the ICU. Pediatric Index of Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Mortality (PICSIM) performance was compared with the performance of Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 and Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 risk of mortality scores, as well as the STAT score and STAT categories by calculating the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic from a validation dataset: PICSIM (area under the curve = 0.87) performed better than Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 (area under the curve = 0.81), Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 (area under the curve = 0.82), STAT score (area under the curve = 0.77), STAT category (area under the curve = 0.75), and Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 (area under the curve = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: This newly developed mortality score, PICSIM, consisting of 13 risk variables encompassing physiology, cardiovascular condition, and time of admission to the ICU showed better discrimination than Pediatric Index of Mortality-2, Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3, and STAT score and category for mortality in a multisite cohort of pediatric cardiac surgical patients. The introduction of the variable "admission time with respect to cardiac surgery" allowed prediction of mortality when patients are admitted to the ICU either before or after the index surgical procedure.
OBJECTIVE: Comparison of clinical outcomes is imperative in the evaluation of healthcare quality. Risk adjustment for children undergoing cardiac surgery poses unique challenges, due to its distinct nature. We developed a risk-adjustment tool specifically focused on critical care mortality for the pediatric cardiac surgical population: the Pediatric Index of Cardiac Surgical Intensive care Mortality score. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected pediatric critical care data. SETTING: Pediatric critical care units in the United States. PATIENTS: Pediatric cardiac intensive care surgical patients. INTERVENTIONS: Prospectively collected data from consecutive patients admitted to ICUs were obtained from The Virtual PICU System (VPS, LLC, Los Angeles, CA), a national pediatric critical care database. Thirty-two candidate physiologic, demographic, and diagnostic variables were analyzed for inclusion in the development of the Pediatric Index of Cardiac Surgical Intensive care Mortality model. Multivariate logistic regression with stepwise selection was used to develop the model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 16,574 cardiac surgical patients from the 55 PICUs across the United States were included in the analysis. Thirteen variables remained in the final model, including the validated Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Congenital Heart Surgery Mortality (STAT) score and admission time with respect to cardiac surgery, which identifies whether the patient underwent the index surgical procedure before or after admission to the ICU. Pediatric Index of Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Mortality (PICSIM) performance was compared with the performance of Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 and Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 risk of mortality scores, as well as the STAT score and STAT categories by calculating the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic from a validation dataset: PICSIM (area under the curve = 0.87) performed better than Pediatric Index of Mortality-2 (area under the curve = 0.81), Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 (area under the curve = 0.82), STAT score (area under the curve = 0.77), STAT category (area under the curve = 0.75), and Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 (area under the curve = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: This newly developed mortality score, PICSIM, consisting of 13 risk variables encompassing physiology, cardiovascular condition, and time of admission to the ICU showed better discrimination than Pediatric Index of Mortality-2, Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3, and STAT score and category for mortality in a multisite cohort of pediatric cardiac surgical patients. The introduction of the variable "admission time with respect to cardiac surgery" allowed prediction of mortality when patients are admitted to the ICU either before or after the index surgical procedure.
Authors: Emily Morell Balkin; Matt S Zinter; Satish K Rajagopal; Roberta L Keller; Jeffrey R Fineman; Martina A Steurer Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Dayanand N Bagdure; Jason W Custer; Cortney B Foster; William C Blackwelder; Vladimir Mishcherkin; Allison Portenoy; Adnan Bhutta Journal: J Pediatr Intensive Care Date: 2020-08-10
Authors: Sarah Tabbutt; Jennifer Schuette; Wenying Zhang; Jeffrey Alten; Janet Donohue; J William Gaynor; Nancy Ghanayem; Jeffrey Jacobs; Sara K Pasquali; Ravi Thiagarajan; Justin B Dimick; Mousumi Banerjee; David Cooper; Michael Gaies Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Michael Gaies; Nancy S Ghanayem; Jeffrey A Alten; John M Costello; Javier J Lasa; Nikhil K Chanani; Andrew Y Shin; Lauren Retzloff; Wenying Zhang; Sara K Pasquali; Mousumi Banerjee; Sarah Tabbutt Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: John T Berger; Richard Holubkov; Ron Reeder; David L Wessel; Kathleen Meert; Robert A Berg; Michael J Bell; Robert Tamburro; J Michael Dean; Murray M Pollack Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Melissa D Aczon; David R Ledbetter; Eugene Laksana; Long V Ho; Randall C Wetzel Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.971