| Literature DB >> 26196186 |
Melanie Di Benedetto1,2, Aurore Toullec3,4,5, Hélène Buteau-Lozano3,4,5, Mohamed Abdelkarim1,2, Sophie Vacher6, Guillaume Velasco3,4,5, Monique Christofari3,4,5, Marc Pocard3,4,5, Ivan Bieche6, Martine Perrot-Applanat3,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a multifunctional cytokine that has important roles in angiogenesis. Our knowledge of the significance of VEGF isoforms in human cancer remains incomplete.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26196186 PMCID: PMC4559830 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Characteristics of the 120 human breast tumours
| Total | 120 (100.0) | 60 (50) | |
| ⩽50 | 20 (16.7) | 11 (55) | 0.60 (NS) |
| >50 | 100 (83.3) | 49 (49) | |
| I | 14 (11.9) | 5 (35.7) | 0.14 (NS) |
| II | 58 (49.2) | 29 (50) | |
| III | 46 (39.0) | 25 (54.3) | |
| 0 | 30 (25.2) | 14 (46.7) | 0.48 (NS) |
| 1–3 | 62 (52.1) | 30 (48.4) | |
| >3 | 27 (22.7) | 16 (59.3) | |
| ⩽25 mm | 56 (47.5) | 22 (39.3) | |
| >25 mm | 62 (52.5) | 37 (59.7) | |
| Negative | 36 (30) | 21 (58.3) | |
| Positive | 84 (70) | 39 (46.4) | |
| Negative | 56 (46.7) | 31 (55.4) | |
| Positive | 64 (53.3) | 29 (45.3) | |
| Negative | 98 (81.7) | 49 (50) | 0.72 (NS) |
| Positive | 22 (18.3) | 11 (50) | |
| RH− ERBB2− | 25 (20.8) | 15 (60) | |
| RH− ERBB2+ | 11 (9.2) | 6 (54.5) | |
| RH+ ERBB2− | 73 (60.8) | 34 (46.6) | |
| RH+ ERBB2+ | 11 (9.2) | 5 (45.5) | |
| Wild type | 79 (65.8) | 42 (53.2) | 0.070 (NS) |
| Mutated | 41 (34.2) | 18 (43.9) | |
Abbreaviation: NS=non significant.
Log-rank: survival distributions were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and the significance of differences in survival rate (P) was assessed in log rank tests.
Scarff Bloom Richardson classification.
Information available for 118 patients.
Information available for 119 patients.
Bold values: P<0.05.
Figure 1VEGF189 overexpression in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells decreases the number of mice with colonisation sites (A) Tumour formation for the various bioluminescent clones injected into mice (n=10). Left panel: number of mice with colonisation sites. Right panel: number of colonisation sites per mouse. (B) Number of mice with colonisation present in the bone and lungs after injection with the various clones (V165, V189 and cV). At the indicated times, the total numbers of mice with metastasis in the bone (legs) and lungs were counted in each group. *PV189 vs PC-V and PV165<0.05 and **PV189 vs PC-V<0.05. (C) Haematoxylin- and eosin-stained sections of breast cancer tumour in lung tissue (T). Different patterns of colonisation are shown: more or less invasive (middle and right, respectively). Original objective magnification, × 16 (top), × 40 (bottom), scale bars are 500 and 200 μm, respectively.
Figure 2Lower invasive capacity and survival of V189-B clones in limiting serum conditions. (A) Histogram showing invasive capacities of cV-B, V189-B and V165-B clones and corresponding sh-NRP-1. Results are presented as % invasion with respect to control cells, for which the value was set at 100% (means of four independent experiments ±s.d.). ***P<0.05. Significant values were shown for V189 vs cV or V165 vs cV. **P<0.05. Significant values were shown for V189 vs sh-NRP-1 of VEGF189 clones (B and C). Survival/apoptotic assay. (B) Histogram showing the mean±s.d. of apoptotic cells in the cV-B, V189-B and V165-B clones. *P<0.01. Significant values were shown for V189 and V165 vs cV. (C) Representative flow cytometry profiles for cV-B, V189-B and V165-B clones incubated in medium supplemented with 0.5% FBS.
Figure 3Stromal compartment and migration of gene expression. (A and B) Immunostaining (A) and quantification (B) for SM-alpha actin. For each animal, two sections per lung positive for tumour cells were immunostained with SM-alpha actin. Original objective magnification, × 32; T (tumor), L (Lung), **P<0.01, significant for V165, respectively, vs cV. (C and D) RT-Q-PCR analyses of VEGF isoforms, MMP-1 (C) and TNC (D) in isolated cVM, V189M and V165M lung tumours cells. TBP was used as an internal control. The relative mRNA levels of each gene in the control are set to 1, and values are expressed as means±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P< 0.01. Scale bar, 250 μm.
Figure 4(A) In silico analysis comparing V165 with V189 as described in Materials and methods, and genes significantly expressed in the BRB data set and associated with invasive potential in the comparison of V165 with V189. (B) In silico analysis comparing V165M with V189M as described in Materials and methods, and genes significantly expressed in the BRB data set and associated with invasive potential in the comparison of V165M with V189M.
Quantitative PCR analyses of the 22 genes of interest in 120 human breast tumours
| CAMSAP1L1 | 27.84 (25.16–29.6) | 1.00 (0.53–1.55) | 1.02 (0.26–27.10) | 1.67% | 97.50% | 0.83% |
| CARS | 28.53 (26.57–30.21) | 1.00 (0.63–1.72) | 1.23 (0.46–14.24) | 0.00% | 93.33% | 6.67% |
| CPNE3 | 26.38 (24.37–27.75) | 1.00 (0.77–1.36) | 1.43 (0.34–17.15) | 0.00% | 89.17% | |
| CTSL1 | 27.18 (25.58–27.95) | 1.00 (0.42–2.46) | 1.11 (0.35–14.87) | 0.00% | 94.17% | 5.83% |
| FAM82B | 28.00 (25.63–29.59) | 1.00 (0.65–1.35) | 1.17 (0,29–3.96) | 6.80% | 85.80% | 7.40% |
| GGH | 28.99 (27.43–30.56) | 1.00 (0.52–1.45) | 1.79 (0.19–13.94) | 2.50% | 68.33% | |
| GINS2 | 30.15 (28.30–32.89) | 1.00 (0.33–1.79) | 2.55 (0,17–50.25) | 0.83% | 56.67% | |
| GPRC5A | 28.08 (25.99–30.82) | 1.00 (0.27–1.92) | 3.52 (0,06–84.28) | 3.33% | 40.00% | |
| HIST1H2BK | 23.97 (21.94–26.18) | 1.00 (0.59–4.55) | 1.46 (0.44–10.02) | 0.00% | 83.33% | |
| HRASLS | 31.89 (29.19–34.00) | 1.00 (0.49–1.43) | 1.27 (0–12.94) | 58.33% | ||
| IMPA1 | 29.23 (27.24–30.25) | 1.00 (0.73–1.31) | 1.22 (0.35–12.06) | 0.00% | 97.50% | 2.50% |
| MMP1 | 34.89 (34.17–49.02) | 1.00 (0–19.2) | 75.31 (0–71.89) | 2.50% | 0.00% | |
| PTPN7 | 31.47 (28.81–34.17) | 1.00 (0.33–5.20) | 2.07 (0.36–16.93) | 0.00% | 69.17% | |
| PXDN | 27.49 (25.86–29.16) | 1.00 (0.64–5.73) | 2.13 (0.35–33.53) | 8.10% | 90.40% | 1.50% |
| SFT2D2 | 26.22 (23.96–27.93) | 1.00 (0.68–1.22) | 0.74 (0.27–7.67) | 2.50% | 95.83% | 1.67% |
| TBC1D8 | 28.44 (26.23–29.85) | 1.00 (0.90–1.30) | 1.19 (0.33–13.40) | 8.10% | 90.40% | 1.50% |
| TPD52 | 27.03 (24.13–28.93) | 1.00 (0.56–1.77) | 3.73 (0.83–47.30) | 0.00% | 35.83% | |
| ZDHHC13 | 29.27 (26.83–30.98) | 1.00 (0.56–1.34) | 1.31 (0.18–6.04) | 2.50% | 91,67% | 5.83% |
| TNC | 27.38 (25.73–31.20) | 1.00 (0.16–1.80) | 0.74 (0.07–30.81) | 60.83% | ||
| VEGF165 | 29.17 (26.76–30.20) | 1.00 (0.61–1.68) | 1.89 (0.35–16.43) | 0.00% | 73.33% | |
| VEGF189 | 30.55 (29.46–31.93) | 1.00 (0.60–2.52) | 1.72 (0–15,54) | 1.67% | 79.16% | |
| VEGFA | 28.21 (26.62–29.71) | 1.00 (0.69–2.15) | 1.82 (0.42–13.37) | 0.00% | 72.50% |
Abbreviation: TNC=tenascin-C.
TBP was used as an internal control. Relative mRNA levels for each gene in the control are set at 1. The median Ct for normal breast tissue is indicated as median Ct (min–max) and median gene expression level is indicated as median (min–max). Relative mRNA levels of 3 or more were considered to indicate marked overexpression and values of 0.33 or less were considered to indicate marked underexpression.
Median (range) of genes Ct values.
Median (range) of gene mRNA levels; the mRNA values of the samples were normalised such so that the median of the 10 normal breast tissues mRNA value was 1. Bold values: under or overexpression >10%.
Figure 5Statistical analysis of mRNA levels. (A) Spearman's rank correlation test for the genes of interest and the proportion of total VEGF-A in the form of VEGF189. Differences were considered significant if P<0.05. (B) Survival curves with an optimal cutoff point. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and groups were compared in log-rank tests. The optimal cutoff point was calculated for each gene and used to distinguish two groups as described in Materials and methods.