BACKGROUND: Improvement of quality of care and patient safety while decreasing costs are major challenges in healthcare systems. This challenge includes the avoidance of perioperative hypothermia to reduce the associated adverse effects, length of stay and treatment costs. Due to the medical and economic relevance the national S3 guidelines for the prevention of perioperative hypothermia were recently published. AIM: This study presents and analyses the reality of utilization of thermal management in German hospitals depending on the size of the hospital, which is based on the number of beds. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on the data of an online survey among all members of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine about perioperative thermal management, a subgroup analysis differentiating between the size of hospitals was performed. The survey included questions about the structural and organizational conditions, the practical implementation of temperature measurement and warming therapy and the developmental status of clinical standard operating procedures (SOP) and educational training. RESULTS: Comparing the structural quality, major differences were found with respect to the availability of core body temperature measurement and the provision of warming devices especially at different peripheral anesthesia workplaces as well as the existence of SOPs and educational training. The availability increased with hospital size. With respect to process quality, the frequency of prewarming increased with hospital size as well as the frequency of intraoperative temperature measurements during different anesthesia procedures. CONCLUSION: Major differences were found in several aspects of perioperative thermal management depending on the hospital size. The main potential for improvement was found in smaller hospitals. Developmental needs primarily exist in the configuration of peripheral anesthesia workplaces, educational training, implementation of SOPs and prewarming of patients.
BACKGROUND: Improvement of quality of care and patient safety while decreasing costs are major challenges in healthcare systems. This challenge includes the avoidance of perioperative hypothermia to reduce the associated adverse effects, length of stay and treatment costs. Due to the medical and economic relevance the national S3 guidelines for the prevention of perioperative hypothermia were recently published. AIM: This study presents and analyses the reality of utilization of thermal management in German hospitals depending on the size of the hospital, which is based on the number of beds. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on the data of an online survey among all members of the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine about perioperative thermal management, a subgroup analysis differentiating between the size of hospitals was performed. The survey included questions about the structural and organizational conditions, the practical implementation of temperature measurement and warming therapy and the developmental status of clinical standard operating procedures (SOP) and educational training. RESULTS: Comparing the structural quality, major differences were found with respect to the availability of core body temperature measurement and the provision of warming devices especially at different peripheral anesthesia workplaces as well as the existence of SOPs and educational training. The availability increased with hospital size. With respect to process quality, the frequency of prewarming increased with hospital size as well as the frequency of intraoperative temperature measurements during different anesthesia procedures. CONCLUSION: Major differences were found in several aspects of perioperative thermal management depending on the hospital size. The main potential for improvement was found in smaller hospitals. Developmental needs primarily exist in the configuration of peripheral anesthesia workplaces, educational training, implementation of SOPs and prewarming of patients.
Authors: Laurent G Glance; Andrew W Dick; Dana B Mukamel; Fergal J Fleming; Raymond A Zollo; Richard Wissler; Rabih Salloum; U Wayne Meredith; Turner M Osler Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 7.892