Literature DB >> 26194207

Stentoplasty effectiveness and safety for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review.

J E Martín-López1, M J Pavón-Gómez2, A Romero-Tabares3, T Molina-López3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To assess the effectiveness and safety of stentoplasty in people with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. A systematic search of databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library, between others, was conducted to June 9, 2014. Clinical trials and observational studies that included alive adults with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures and the comparators were the intervention himself, vertebroplasty or balloon kyphoplasty were selected. Quality of evidence was graded according to the GRADE approach. Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Forty-two citations were identified during the search. After removing duplicates, five studies were included: two clinical trials and three observational studies. Stentoplasty, showed higher rate of adverse events related to material (P=0.043) and cuff pressure (P=0.014) in comparison to kyphoplasty. There was no difference between two procedures in terms of reduction of kyphosis, time of exposure to radiation or postoperative loss of cement. Stentoplasty in comparison to vertebroplasty, showed an improvement of restoration of vertebral height (P=0.042), kyphosis correction and volume of bone cement. No differences were found between two procedures in terms of loss of vertebral body volume. Based on observational studies, stentoplasty improved vertebral height, pain and functional disability at 6 and 12months follow-up, and corrected the angle vertebral fractures in patients with osteoporotic vertebral body. Stentoplasty was presented as a safe procedure in short-medium term, with a low complication rate, a reduced loss of cement and new vertebral body fractures lower rates. Stentoplasty improves vertebral height, reduces the pain and functional disability and correct the vertebral angle in patients with osteoporotic vertebral body fracture with minimum adverse events. Stentoplasty is comparable to kyphoplasty in terms of correction of kyphosis, time of exposure to radiation and cement postoperative loss, and comparable to vertebroplasty in terms of restoration of vertebral height correction and bone cement volume. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II systematic review.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kyphoplasty; Osteoporosis; Prostheses and implants; Stentoplasty; Vertebral fracture; Vertebroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26194207     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  10 in total

1.  Is vertebral body stenting in combination with CaP cement superior to kyphoplasty?

Authors:  Sebastian Schützenberger; S M Schwarz; L Greiner; O Holub; S Grabner; W Huf; A Sailler; C Fialka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Percutaneous vertebral augmentation in fragility fractures-indications and limitations.

Authors:  O Gonschorek; S Hauck; T Weiß; V Bühren
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Percutaneous low-pressure bone stenting to control cement deposition in extensive lytic lesions.

Authors:  Francois H Cornelis; Francois Petitpierre; Thierry Fabre; Olivier Gille; Nicolas Amoretti; Olivier Hauger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Three generations of treatments for osteoporotic vertebral fractures: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Luigi Aurelio Nasto; Eugenio Jannelli; Valerio Cipolloni; Luca Piccone; Alessandro Cattolico; Alessandro Santagada; Charlotte Pripp; Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Enrico Pola
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-10-13

5.  Vertebral body cemented stents combined with posterior stabilization in the surgical treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression of the thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  Riaz Mohammed; Maggie Lee; Shrijit Panikkar; Naveed Yasin; Kamran Hassan; Saeed Mohammad
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-07-25

6.  Clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty for selective single segment dorsolumbar vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal; Tung-Yi Lin
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-06-08

7.  A novel vertebroplasty technique using a larger-diameter needle for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Eugene J Park; Ho-Jin Lee; Min-Gu Jang; Jae-Sung Ahn; Sang Bum Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Percutaneous cement augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Amer Sebaaly; Maroun Rizkallah; Falah Bachour; Firas Atallah; Pierre Emmanuel Moreau; Ghassan Maalouf
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-06-22

Review 9.  A 20-Year Review of Biomechanical Experimental Studies on Spine Implants Used for Percutaneous Surgical Repair of Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Sairam Gajavelli; Aaron Gee; Z Shaghayegh Bagheri; Emil H Schemitsch; Christopher S Bailey; Parham Rasoulinejad; Radovan Zdero
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.246

10.  Stent augmentation of an anterior odontoid screw for type 2 odontoid fracture-dislocation in the elderly population: Report of two cases and literature review.

Authors:  Saurabh Kapoor; Oded Herschkovich; Corrado Lucantoni; Bronek Boszczyk
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2020-01-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.