Literature DB >> 26194101

Effect of species-specific differences in chromosome morphology on chromatin compaction and the frequency and distribution of RAD51 and MLH1 foci in two bovid species: cattle (Bos taurus) and the common eland (Taurotragus oryx).

Hana Sebestova1, Miluse Vozdova2, Svatava Kubickova1, Halina Cernohorska1, Radim Kotrba3, Jiri Rubes1.   

Abstract

Meiotic recombination between homologous chromosomes is crucial for their correct segregation into gametes and for generating diversity. We compared the frequency and distribution of MLH1 foci and RAD51 foci, synaptonemal complex (SC) length and DNA loop size in two related Bovidae species that share chromosome arm homology but show an extreme difference in their diploid chromosome number: cattle (Bos taurus, 2n = 60) and the common eland (Taurotragus oryx, 2nmale = 31). Compared to cattle, significantly fewer MLH1 foci per cell were observed in the common eland, which can be attributed to the lower number of initial double-strand breaks (DSBs) detected as RAD51 foci in leptonema. Despite the significantly shorter total autosomal SC length and longer DNA loop size of the common eland bi-armed chromosomes compared to those of bovine acrocentrics, the overall crossover density in the common eland was still lower than in cattle, probably due to the reduction in the number of MLH1 foci in the proximal regions of the bi-armed chromosomes. The formation of centric fusions during karyotype evolution of the common eland accompanied by meiotic chromatin compaction has greater implications in the reduction in the number of DSBs in leptonema than in the decrease of MLH1 foci number in pachynema.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunofluorescence; MLH1; Meiosis; RAD51; Recombination; SCP3; Spermatocyte; Synaptonemal complex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26194101     DOI: 10.1007/s00412-015-0533-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  61 in total

1.  Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals.

Authors:  F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; C Sapienza
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Meiotic synapsis proceeds from a limited number of subtelomeric sites in the human male.

Authors:  Petrice W Brown; Luann Judis; E Ricky Chan; Stuart Schwartz; Allen Seftel; Anthony Thomas; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Repression of meiotic crossing over by a centromere (CEN3) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  E J Lambie; G S Roeder
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Human male recombination maps for individual chromosomes.

Authors:  Fei Sun; Maria Oliver-Bonet; Thomas Liehr; Heike Starke; Evelyn Ko; Alfred Rademaker; Joaquima Navarro; Jordi Benet; Renée H Martin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Chromosomal speciation in mice: a cytogenetic analysis of recombination.

Authors:  Valeria Merico; Mabel D Giménez; Chiara Vasco; Maurizio Zuccotti; Jeremy B Searle; Heidi C Hauffe; Silvia Garagna
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Variation in crossover interference levels on individual chromosomes from human males.

Authors:  Jie Lian; Yimeng Yin; Maria Oliver-Bonet; Thomas Liehr; Evelyn Ko; Paul Turek; Fei Sun; Renée H Martin
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  General pattern of meiotic recombination in male dogs estimated by MLH1 and RAD51 immunolocalization.

Authors:  E A Basheva; C J Bidau; P M Borodin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Recombination map of the common shrew, Sorex araneus (Eulipotyphla, Mammalia).

Authors:  Pavel M Borodin; Tatyana V Karamysheva; Nadezhda M Belonogova; Anna A Torgasheva; Nikolai B Rubtsov; Jeremy B Searle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  RAD51 and DMC1 form mixed complexes associated with mouse meiotic chromosome cores and synaptonemal complexes.

Authors:  M Tarsounas; T Morita; R E Pearlman; P B Moens
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-10-18       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Meiotic recombination analyses of individual chromosomes in male domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica).

Authors:  Nicolas Mary; Harmonie Barasc; Stéphane Ferchaud; Yvon Billon; Frédéric Meslier; David Robelin; Anne Calgaro; Anne-Marie Loustau-Dudez; Nathalie Bonnet; Martine Yerle; Hervé Acloque; Alain Ducos; Alain Pinton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Recombination correlates with synaptonemal complex length and chromatin loop size in bovids-insights into mammalian meiotic chromosomal organization.

Authors:  Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; Miluse Vozdova; Jonathan Fernández; Hana Sebestova; Laia Capilla; Jan Frohlich; Covadonga Vara; Adrià Hernández-Marsal; Jaroslav Sipek; Terence J Robinson; Jiri Rubes
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Meiotic behaviour of evolutionary sex-autosome translocations in Bovidae.

Authors:  Miluse Vozdova; Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; Jonathan Fernandez; Halina Cernohorska; Jan Frohlich; Hana Sebestova; Svatava Kubickova; Jiri Rubes
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Therapeutic Dose of Hydroxyurea-Induced Synaptic Abnormalities on the Mouse Spermatocyte.

Authors:  Xiaobo Fan; Yunxia Zhu; Naixin Wang; Bing Zhang; Cui Zhang; Yanan Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.