INTRODUCTION: Benzaldehyde dimethane sulfonate (BEN, DMS612, NSC281612) is a bifunctional alkylating agent currently in clinical trials. We previously characterized the degradation products of BEN in plasma and blood. The conversion of BEN to its carboxylic acid analogue (BA) in whole blood, but not plasma, suggests that an enzyme in RBCs may be responsible for this conversion. BEN conversion to BA was observed in renal carcinoma cells and appeared to correlate with IC₅₀. To better understand the pharmacology of BEN, we aimed to evaluate the metabolism and enzymes potentially responsible for the conversion of BEN to BA. METHODS: Human red blood cells (RBC) were used to characterize kinetics and susceptibility to enzyme-specific inhibitors. Recombinant enzymes were used to confirm metabolism of BEN to BA. Analytes were quantitated with established LC-MS/MS methods. RESULTS: Average apparent Vmax and Km were 68 ng/mL min(-1) [10% RBC](-1) and 373 ng/mL, respectively. The conversion of BEN to BA in RBC was not inhibited by carbon monoxide, nitrogen gas, or menadione, an inhibitor of aldehyde oxidase. The conversion was inhibited by disulfiram, an inhibitor of ALDH. Of available ALDH isoforms ALDH1A1, ALDH3A1, ALDH2, and ALDH5A1, only ALDH1A1 converted BEN to BA. CONCLUSION: The activating conversion of BEN to BA is mediated not by CYP450 enzymes or aldehyde oxidase, but by ALDH1A1. This enzyme, a potential stem cell marker, may be a candidate biomarker for clinical activity of BEN.
INTRODUCTION:Benzaldehyde dimethane sulfonate (BEN, DMS612, NSC281612) is a bifunctional alkylating agent currently in clinical trials. We previously characterized the degradation products of BEN in plasma and blood. The conversion of BEN to its carboxylic acid analogue (BA) in whole blood, but not plasma, suggests that an enzyme in RBCs may be responsible for this conversion. BENconversion to BA was observed in renal carcinoma cells and appeared to correlate with IC₅₀. To better understand the pharmacology of BEN, we aimed to evaluate the metabolism and enzymes potentially responsible for the conversion of BEN to BA. METHODS:Human red blood cells (RBC) were used to characterize kinetics and susceptibility to enzyme-specific inhibitors. Recombinant enzymes were used to confirm metabolism of BEN to BA. Analytes were quantitated with established LC-MS/MS methods. RESULTS: Average apparent Vmax and Km were 68 ng/mL min(-1) [10% RBC](-1) and 373 ng/mL, respectively. The conversion of BEN to BA in RBC was not inhibited by carbon monoxide, nitrogengas, or menadione, an inhibitor of aldehyde oxidase. The conversion was inhibited by disulfiram, an inhibitor of ALDH. Of available ALDH isoforms ALDH1A1, ALDH3A1, ALDH2, and ALDH5A1, only ALDH1A1converted BEN to BA. CONCLUSION: The activating conversion of BEN to BA is mediated not by CYP450 enzymes or aldehyde oxidase, but by ALDH1A1. This enzyme, a potential stem cell marker, may be a candidate biomarker for clinical activity of BEN.
Authors: Robert A Parise; Bean N Anyang; Julie L Eiseman; Merrill J Egorin; Joseph M Covey; Jan H Beumer Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Carmen Visus; Yangyang Wang; Antonio Lozano-Leon; Robert L Ferris; Susan Silver; Miroslaw J Szczepanski; Randall E Brand; Cristina R Ferrone; Theresa L Whiteside; Soldano Ferrone; Albert B DeLeo; Xinhui Wang Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-08-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Susan D Mertins; Timothy G Myers; Susan L Holbeck; Wilma Medina-Perez; Elaine Wang; Glenda Kohlhagen; Yves Pommier; Susan E Bates Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Courtney R Lavalle; Karla Bravo-Altamirano; Karthik V Giridhar; Jun Chen; Elizabeth Sharlow; John S Lazo; Peter Wipf; Q Jane Wang Journal: BMC Chem Biol Date: 2010-05-05
Authors: John P Spence; Tiebing Liang; C J Peter Eriksson; Robert E Taylor; Tamara L Wall; Cindy L Ehlers; Lucinda G Carr Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Robert A Parise; Jan H Beumer; Dana M Clausen; Lora H Rigatti; Judy A Ziegler; Maura Gasparetto; Clayton A Smith; Julie L Eiseman Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 3.333