| Literature DB >> 26193879 |
Kashaf Junaid1,2, Abdul Rehman3, Tahir Saeed4, David A Jolliffe5, Kristie Wood6, Adrian R Martineau7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Both vitamin D deficiency and genetic variants in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) have been reported to associate with delayed response to intensive-phase therapy for pulmonary tuberculosis. Studies investigating the influence of genetic variants in vitamin D binding protein (DBP) and vitamin D 25-hydroxylase (CYP2R1) on vitamin D status and response to antituberculous therapy are lacking.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26193879 PMCID: PMC4508807 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1018-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Participant enrolment and follow-up
Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants at baseline (n = 260)
| Age | Mean age, years (s.d.) | .31.6 (10.5) |
|---|---|---|
| Age range, years | 14 to 55 | |
| Sex | Male, N (%) | 120 (46 %) |
| Female, N (%) | 140 (54 %) | |
| Socioeconomic statusa | Lower, N (%) | 177 (68 %) |
| Higher, N (%) | 83 (32 %) | |
| Month of recruitment | April - September, N (%) | 137 (53 %) |
| October - March, N (%) | 123 (47 %) | |
| Sensitivity profile | Fully-sensitive | 56 (22 %) |
| Multidrug-resistant | 16 (6 %) | |
| Undetermined | 188 (72 %) | |
| Extent of disease | Unilateral | 144 (55 %) |
| Bilateral | 116 (45 %) | |
| Sputum smear | 1–99 AFB per 100 HPF | 177 (68 %) |
| ≥100 AFB per 100 HPF | 83 (32 %) | |
| Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration | Median, nmol/L (IQR) | 23.3 (16.0 to 34.0) |
| <25 nmol/L, N (%) | 140 (54 %) | |
| 25.0 to 49.9 nmol/L, N (%) | 97 (37 %) | |
| 50.0 to 74.9 nmol/L, N (%) | 17 (7 %) | |
| ≥75.0 nmol/L, N (%) | 6 (2 %) |
AFB acid-fast bacilli, HPF high-power microscopy fields
aLower socioeconomic status indicated by patient being in receipt of financial aid for hospital costs
Determinants of baseline Vitamin D status (n = 260)
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 25(OH)D <25 nmol/L, N (%) | OR (95 % CI) | P | Adjusted OR (95 % CI)a | P | |||
| Phenotypic characteristics | Sex | Male | 120 | 49 (41 %) | Ref | Ref | ||
| Female | 140 | 91 (65 %) | 2.67 (1.62 to 2.45) | <0.001 | 2.60(1.50 to 4.52) | 0.001 | ||
| Season of recruitment | Summer | 137 | 66 (48 %) | Ref | Ref | |||
| Winter | 123 | 74 (60 %) | 1.62 (0.99 to 2.65) | 0.053 | 1.75 (1.00 to 3.04) | 0.047 | ||
| Socioeconomic statusb | Lower | 177 | 96 (54 %) | Ref | ||||
| Higher | 83 | 44 (53 %) | 0.95 (0.56 to 1.60) | 0.85 | - | - | ||
| Extent of disease | Unilateral | 144 | 67 (46 %) | Ref | Ref | |||
| Bilateral | 116 | 73 (63 %) | 1.95 (1.18 to 3.21) | 0.009 | 1.89 (1.49 to 4.52) | 0.025 | ||
| Sputum smear | 1–99 AFB per 100 HPF | 106 | 53 (50 %) | Ref | ||||
| ≥100 AFB per 100 HPF | 154 | 87 (56 %) | 0.74 (0.45 to 1.22) | 0.24 | - | - | ||
| Age | <30 years | 124 | 67 (54 %) | Ref | ||||
| ≥30 years | 136 | 73 (54 %) | 0.98 (0.60 to 1.60) | 0.95 | - | - | ||
| Genotypic characteristics | rs731236, VDR | AA | 83 | 38 (46 %) | Ref | 0.14 | ||
| AG | 115 | 67 (58 %) | 1.65 (0.93 to 2.92) | - | - | |||
| GG | 27 | 17 (63 %) | 2.01 (0.82 to 4.91) | - | - | |||
| rs1544410,VDR | CC | 53 | 23 (43 %) | Ref | 0.098 | |||
| CT | 128 | 74 (58 %) | 1.78 (0.94 to 3.41) | 1.66 (0.84 to 3.28) | 0.14 | |||
| TT | 54 | 34 (63 %) | 2.21 (1.02 to 4.81) | 2.23 (0.98 to 5.05) | 0.054 | |||
| rs2228570,VDR | GG | 137 | 76 (55 %) | Ref | 0.96 | |||
| GA | 83 | 47 (57 %) | 1.04 (0.60 to 1.81) | - | - | |||
| AA | 15 | 8 (53 %) | 0.92 (0.31 to 2.67) | - | - | |||
| rs2060793, CYP2R1 | GG | 112 | 62 (55 %) | Ref | 0.81 | |||
| AG | 106 | 62 (58 %) | 0.80 (0.22 to 2.94) | - | - | |||
| AA | 10 | 5 (50 %) | 1.13 (0.66 to 1.94) | - | - | |||
| rs10500804, CYP2R1 | GG | 59 | 34 (58 %) | Ref | 0.34 | |||
| GT | 120 | 69 (58 %) | 0.99 (0.53 to 1.87) | - | - | |||
| TT | 52 | 24 (46 %) | 0.63 (0.29 to 1.33) | - | - | |||
| rs10766197, CYP2R1 | AA | 52 | 29 (56 %) | Ref | 0.60 | |||
| AG | 124 | 72 (58 %) | 1.18 (0.57 to 2.11) | - | - | |||
| GG | 56 | 28 (50 %) | 0.84 (0.37 to 1.72) | - | - | |||
| rs7041, DBP | AA | 55 | 34 (62 %) | Ref | 0.57 | |||
| AC | 106 | 57 (54 %) | 0.72 (0.37 to 1.47) | - | - | |||
| CC | 71 | 38 (54 %) | 0.71 (0.34 to 1.45) | - | - | |||
| rs4588,DBP | GG | 122 | 66 (54 %) | Ref | 0.14 | |||
| GT | 91 | 49 (54 %) | 0.99 (0.57 to 1.70) | - | - | |||
| TT | 21 | 16 (76 %) | 2.71 (0.93 to 7.88) | - | - | |||
25(OH)D 25-hydroxyvitamin D, OR odds ratio, Ref referent category, AFB acid-fast bacilli, HPF high-power fields, VDR vitamin D receptor, CYP2R1 vitamin D 25-hydroxylase, DBP vitamin D binding protein
aadjusted for sex, season of recruitment, extent of disease and rs1544410 genotype. blower socioeconomic status indicated by patient being in receipt of financial aid for hospital costs
Fig. 2Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration for n = 260 study participants by sex (a), extent of disease (b) and season (c). P values from binary logistic regression adjusted for sex, extent of disease, season of enrolment and BsmI vitamin D receptor genotype
Determinants of time to sputum smear conversion (n = 260)
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Median TTSC, days (IQR) | HR (95 % CI) | P | Adjusted HR (95 % CI)a | P | |||
| Phenotypic characteristics | Sex | Male | 120 | 7.5 (7.5–22.5) | 1.47 (1.11–1.80) | 0.01 | 1.16 (0.91–1.51) | 0.26 |
| Female | 140 | 22.5 (7.5–35) | Ref | - | Ref | - | ||
| Socioeconomic statusb | Lower | 177 | 21 (7.5–30) | 0.96 (0.73–1.23) | 0.68 | - | - | |
| Higher | 83 | 21 (7.5–22.5) | Ref | - | - | - | ||
| Extent of disease | Unilateral | 144 | 7.5 (7.5–22.5) | 1.38 (1.07–1.78) | 0.01 | 1.21(0.85–1.55) | 0.23 | |
| Bilateral | 116 | 22.5 (7.5–36.5) | Ref | - | Ref | - | ||
| Sputum smear | 1–99 AFB per 100 HPF | 106 | 7.5 (7.5–22.5) | 0.80 (0.6–1.01) | 0.60 | - | - | |
| ≥100 AFB per 100 HPF | 154 | 22.5 (7.5–23) | Ref | - | - | - | ||
| Age | <30 years | 124 | 21 (7.5–22.5) | 1.14 (0.91–1.50) | 0.33 | - | - | |
| ≥30 years | 136 | 22 (7.5–37.5) | Ref | - | - | - | ||
| 25(OH)D | <25 nmol/l | 140 | 22.5 (22.5–37.5) | 4.93 (3.55–6.86) | <0.001 | 4.36(3.25–6.65) | <0.001 | |
| ≥25 nmol/l | 120 | 7.5 (7.5–7.5) | Ref | - | Ref | - | ||
| Drug sensitivity | Fully–sensitive / unknown | 244 | 15 (7.5–22.5) | Ref | - | Ref | - | |
| Multidrug–resistant | 16 | 52.5 (Undefined–35) | 3.92 (2.12–7.24) | <0.001 | 3.35 (1.71–6.54) | <0.001 | ||
| Genotypic characteristics | rs731236, VDR | AA | 84 | 7.5 (7.5–22.5) | 0.87 (0.71–1.06) | 0.16 | - | - |
| AG | 117 | 21 (7.5–30) | ||||||
| GG | 29 | 22.5 (7.5–37.5) | ||||||
| rs1544410,VDR | CC | 53 | 7.5 (7.5–22.5) | 0.89 (0.73–1.08) | 0.26 | - | - | |
| CT | 128 | 21 (7.5–35) | ||||||
| TT | 54 | 21.5 (7.5–23) | ||||||
| rs2228570,VDR | GG | 138 | 15 (7.5–23) | 1.04 (0.84–1.28) | 0.70 | - | - | |
| GA | 83 | 22.5 (7.5–22.5) | ||||||
| AA | 15 | 7.5 (7.5–22.5) | ||||||
| rs2060793,CYP2R1 | AA | 10 | 21 (7.5–22.5) | 0.88 (0.69–1.11) | 0.28 | - | - | |
| AG | 106 | 21 (7.5–23) | ||||||
| GG | 112 | 21 (7.5–23) | ||||||
| rs10500804,CYP2R1 | GG | 59 | 15 (7.5–22.5) | 1.12(0.92–1.38) | 0.24 | - | - | |
| GT | 120 | 22.5 (7.5–35) | ||||||
| TT | 52 | 7.5 (7.5–22.5) | ||||||
| rs10766197,CYP2R1 | AA | 52 | 15 (7.5–22.5) | 1.13 (0.92–1.38) | 0.24 | - | - | |
| AG | 124 | 22.5 (7.5–35) | ||||||
| GG | 56 | 15 (7.5–22.5) | ||||||
| rs7041,DBP | AA | 55 | 22.5 (7.5–22.5) | 1.0 (0.83–1.21) | 0.94 | - | - | |
| AC | 106 | 15 (7.5–22.5) | ||||||
| CC | 71 | 7.5 (7.5–23) | ||||||
| rs4588,DBP | GG | 122 | 21 (7.5–23) | 1.01 (0.82–1.23) | 0.90 | - | - | |
| GT | 91 | 15 (7.5–22.5) | ||||||
| TT | 21 | 22.5 (15–22.5) | ||||||
TTSC time to sputum smear conversion, IQR interquartile range, HR hazard ratio, Ref referent category, AFB acid–fast bacilli, HPF high–power microscopy fields, 25(OH)D 25–hydroxyvitamin D, VDR vitamin D receptor, CYP2R1 vitamin D 25–hydroxylase, DBP vitamin D binding protein
aadjusted for sex, extent of disease, baseline vitamin D status and drug sensitivity; blower socioeconomic status indicated by patient being in receipt of financial aid for hospital costs
Fig. 3Time to sputum smear conversion by baseline vitamin D status (a) and drug sensitivity of M. tuberculosis isolate (b). Numbers of patients with positive sputum smear remaining in follow-up (number at risk) at 0, 14, 28, 42, 56 and 70 days are shown
Influence of vitamin D status on time to sputum smear conversion by genetic sub–groups
| SNP, Gene | Genotype | N | Adjusted HR for 25(OH)D <25 vs. ≥25 nmol/L (95 % CI)a | P | HR, interaction term (95 % CI) | Pinteraction b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs731236, VDR | AA | 84 | 5.87 (3.20–10.76) | <0.001 | 0.84 (0.56–1.24) | 0.37 |
| AG | 117 | 4.27 (2.65–6.86) | <0.001 | |||
| GG | 29 | 5.53 (1.92–15.94) | <0.001 | |||
| rs1544410,VDR | CC | 53 | 5.97 (2.73–13.04) | <0.001 | 0.79 (0.53–1.17) | 0.24 |
| CT | 128 | 4.45 (2.81–7.05) | <0.001 | |||
| TT | 54 | 4.61 (2.25–9.43) | <0.001 | |||
| rs2228570,VDR | GG | 138 | 6.53 (3.99–10.66) | <0.001 | 0.61 (0.38–0.96) | 0.03 |
| GA | 83 | 3.02 (1.82–5.01) | <0.001 | |||
| AA | 15 | 4.58 (0.56–37.25) | 0.16 | |||
| rs7041,DBP | AA | 55 | 4.81 (2.49–9.32) | <0.001 | 1.0 (0.69–1.45) | 0.98 |
| AC | 106 | 6.39 (3.61–11.30) | <0.001 | |||
| CC | 71 | 3.29 (1.86–5.83) | <0.001 | |||
| rs4588,DBP | GG | 122 | 3.65 (2.32–5.75) | <0.001 | 1.09 (0.70–1.68) | 0.69 |
| GT | 91 | 6.46 (3.60–11.59) | <0.001 | |||
| TT | 21 | 3.92 (3.60–5.78) | <0.001 | |||
| rs10500804,CYP2R1 | GG | 59 | 4.46 (2.28–8.71) | <0.001 | 1.06 (0.71–1.58) | 0.76 |
| GT | 120 | 4.69 (2.89–7.61) | <0.001 | |||
| TT | 52 | 5.38 (2.35–12.31) | <0.001 | |||
| rs2060793,CYP2R1 | AA | 10 | 4.47 (0.81–24.47) | 0.084 | 0.86 (0.54–1.36) | 0.53 |
| AG | 106 | 6.79 (3.86–11.94) | <0.001 | |||
| GG | 112 | 4.10 (2.52–6.68) | <0.001 | |||
| rs10766197,CYP2R1 | AA | 52 | 4.15 (2.08–8.29) | <0.001 | 1.03 (0.68–1.54) | 0.88 |
| AG | 124 | 5.12 (3.15–8.32) | <0.001 | |||
| GG | 56 | 4.82 (2.25–10.30) | <0.001 |
SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, HR hazard ratio, 25(OH)D 25–hydroxyvitamin D, CI confidence interval, VDR vitamin D receptor, CYP2R1 vitamin D 25–hydroxylase, DBP vitamin D binding protein
aadjusted for drug sensitivity profile; bnone of these were significant using a Benjamini and Hochberg procedure controlling the false discovery rate at 20 %