Chao-Hung Chen1, Ming-Chieh Tsai2, Herng-Ching Lin3, Hsin-Chien Lee4, Cha-Ze Lee5, Shiu-Dong Chung6. 1. Department of Cosmetic Applications and Management, Mackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing, and Management, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Thoracic Surgery, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department and Institute of Physiology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. Sleep Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 4. Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 6. Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan. Electronic address: chungshiudong@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the appendix may not be considered vital, recent studies have noted adverse health consequences after appendectomy. This study aimed to use a population-based data set to explore whether appendectomy increases the risk for subsequent ischemic heart disease (IHD) in a 3-y follow-up period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used data from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 in Taiwan. The study cohort included 5413 patients who underwent appendectomies. The comparison cohort was selected by randomly recruiting 16,239 enrollees matched with the study group in terms of sex, age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. Each individual was tracked for 3 y to identify whether he and/or she developed IHD during the follow-up period. Cox proportional hazard regressions were performed for analysis. RESULTS: During a 3-y follow-up, 196 (3.62%) and 375 (2.31%) IHD incidents developed in the study and the comparison cohorts, respectively. For adults aged ≥18 y, experiencing an appendectomy was independently associated with a 1.54-fold increased risk of IHD during the 3 y of follow-up (95% CI = 1.29-1.84). The association persisted in further analyses stratified by age. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of subsequent IHD within 3 y after appendectomy, and this underscores the need for more serious clinical decision-making in removing the appendix. Regular monitoring for IHDs is also recommended for patients who have undergone an appendectomy.
BACKGROUND: Although the appendix may not be considered vital, recent studies have noted adverse health consequences after appendectomy. This study aimed to use a population-based data set to explore whether appendectomy increases the risk for subsequent ischemic heart disease (IHD) in a 3-y follow-up period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used data from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 in Taiwan. The study cohort included 5413 patients who underwent appendectomies. The comparison cohort was selected by randomly recruiting 16,239 enrollees matched with the study group in terms of sex, age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. Each individual was tracked for 3 y to identify whether he and/or she developed IHD during the follow-up period. Cox proportional hazard regressions were performed for analysis. RESULTS: During a 3-y follow-up, 196 (3.62%) and 375 (2.31%) IHD incidents developed in the study and the comparison cohorts, respectively. For adults aged ≥18 y, experiencing an appendectomy was independently associated with a 1.54-fold increased risk of IHD during the 3 y of follow-up (95% CI = 1.29-1.84). The association persisted in further analyses stratified by age. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of subsequent IHD within 3 y after appendectomy, and this underscores the need for more serious clinical decision-making in removing the appendix. Regular monitoring for IHDs is also recommended for patients who have undergone an appendectomy.