Literature DB >> 26193798

Use of Community Assessments for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPERs) to Rapidly Assess Public Health Issues - United States, 2003-2012.

Tesfaye M Bayleyegn, Amy H Schnall, Shimere G Ballou, David F Zane, Sherry L Burrer, Rebecca S Noe, Amy F Wolkin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER) is an epidemiologic technique designed to provide quick, inexpensive, accurate, and reliable household-based public health information about a community's emergency response needs. The Health Studies Branch at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides in-field assistance and technical support to state, local, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) health departments in conducting CASPERs during a disaster response and in non-emergency settings. Data from CASPERs conducted from 2003 through 2012 were reviewed to describe uses of CASPER, ascertain strengths of the CASPER methodology, and highlight significant findings.
METHODS: Through an assessment of the CDC's CASPER metadatabase, all CASPERs that involved CDC support performed in US states and territories from 2003 through 2012 were reviewed and compared descriptively for differences in geographic distribution, sampling methodology, mapping tool, assessment settings, and result and action taken by decision makers.
RESULTS: For the study period, 53 CASPERs were conducted in 13 states and one US territory. Among the 53 CASPERS, 38 (71.6%) used the traditional 2-stage cluster sampling methodology, 10 (18.8%) used a 3-stage cluster sampling, and two (3.7%) used a simple random sampling methodology. Among the CASPERs, 37 (69.9%) were conducted in response to specific natural or human-induced disasters, including 14 (37.8%) for hurricanes. The remaining 16 (30.1%) CASPERS were conducted in non-disaster settings to assess household preparedness levels or potential effects of a proposed plan or program. The most common recommendations resulting from a disaster-related CASPER were to educate the community on available resources (27; 72.9%) and provide services (18; 48.6%) such as debris removals and refills of medications. In preparedness CASPERs, the most common recommendations were to educate the community in disaster preparedness (5; 31.2%) and to revise or improve preparedness plans (5; 31.2%). Twenty-five (47.1%) CASPERs documented on the report or publications the public health action has taken based on the result or recommendations. Findings from 27 (50.9%) of the CASPERs conducted with CDC assistance were published in peer-reviewed journals or elsewhere.
CONCLUSION: The number of CASPERs conducted with CDC assistance has increased and diversified over the past decade. The CASPERs' results and recommendations supported the public health decisions that benefitted the community. Overall, the findings suggest that the CASPER is a useful tool for collecting household-level disaster preparedness and response data and generating information to support public health action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26193798      PMCID: PMC4630127          DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X15004938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med        ISSN: 1049-023X            Impact factor:   2.040


  15 in total

1.  Rapid community health and needs assessments after Hurricanes Isabel and Charley--North Carolina, 2003-2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Rapid assessment of the needs and health status of older adults after Hurricane Charley--Charlotte, DeSoto, and Hardee Counties, Florida, August 27-31, 2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Community assessment for public health emergency response following Hurricane Ike--Texas, 25-30 September 2008.

Authors:  David F Zane; Tesfaye M Bayleyegn; Tracy L Haywood; Dana Wiltz-Beckham; Harlan Mark Guidry; Carlos Sanchez; Amy F Wolkin
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.040

4.  Rapid assessment of the needs and health status in Santa Rosa and Escambia counties, Florida, after Hurricane Ivan, September 2004.

Authors:  Tesfaye Bayleyegn; Amy Wolkin; Kathleen Oberst; Stacy Young; Carlos Sanchez; Annette Phelps; Joann Schulte; Carol Rubin; Dahna Batts
Journal:  Disaster Manag Response       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar

5.  Rapid needs assessment of two rural communities after Hurricane Wilma--Hendry County, Florida, November 1-2, 2005.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  A modified cluster-sampling method for post-disaster rapid assessment of needs.

Authors:  J Malilay; W D Flanders; D Brogan
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Injuries and illnesses related to Hurricane Andrew--Louisiana, 1992.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1993-04-09       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Comprehensive assessment of health needs 2 months after Hurricane Andrew--Dade County, Florida, 1992.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1993-06-11       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  A computer simulation of the EPI survey strategy.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; A G Tserkovnyi; J L Tulloch; J E Dowd; S K Lwanga; J Keja
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Cluster sampling to assess immunization coverage: a review of experience with a simplified sampling method.

Authors:  R H Henderson; T Sundaresan
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 9.408

View more
  5 in total

1.  Getting the Message Out: Social Media and Word-of-Mouth as Effective Communication Methods during Emergencies.

Authors:  Amy F Wolkin; Amy H Schnall; Nicole K Nakata; Esther M Ellis
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 2.040

2.  Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER): An Innovative Emergency Management Tool in the United States.

Authors:  Amy Schnall; Nicole Nakata; Todd Talbert; Tesfaye Bayleyegn; DeAndrea Martinez; Amy Wolkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Physical, Mental, and Financial Impacts From Drought in Two California Counties, 2015.

Authors:  Tracy Barreau; David Conway; Karen Haught; Rebecca Jackson; Richard Kreutzer; Andrew Lockman; Sharon Minnick; Rachel Roisman; David Rozell; Svetlana Smorodinsky; Dana Tafoya; Jason A Wilken
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Rapid Health Needs Assessment after Typhoons Bolaven and Tembin Using the Public Health Assessment for Emergency Response Toolkit in Paju and Jeju, Korea 2012.

Authors:  Ki Jeong Hong; Kyoung Jun Song; Sang Do Shin; Sung Wook Song; Young Sun Ro; Joo Jeong; Tae Han Kim; Yu Jin Lee; Minsook Kim; Soo Nam Jo; Min Young Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 5.  A comparative assessment of major international disasters: the need for exposure assessment, systematic emergency preparedness, and lifetime health care.

Authors:  Roberto G Lucchini; Dana Hashim; Sushma Acquilla; Angela Basanets; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Andrey Bushmanov; Michael Crane; Denise J Harrison; William Holden; Philip J Landrigan; Benjamin J Luft; Paolo Mocarelli; Nailya Mazitova; James Melius; Jacqueline M Moline; Koji Mori; David Prezant; Joan Reibman; Dori B Reissman; Alexander Stazharau; Ken Takahashi; Iris G Udasin; Andrew C Todd
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.