| Literature DB >> 26192543 |
Aisling Spain1, Clare Howarth2, Alexandre A Khrapitchev3, Trevor Sharp4, Nicola R Sibson5, Chris Martin6.
Abstract
The development of pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging (phMRI) has presented the opportunity for investigation of the neurophysiological effects of drugs in vivo. Psilocin, a hallucinogen metabolised from psilocybin, was recently reported to evoke brain region-specific, phMRI signal changes in humans. The present study investigated the effects of psilocin in a rat model using phMRI and then probed the relationship between neuronal and haemodynamic responses using a multimodal measurement preparation. Psilocin (2 mg/kg or 0.03 mg/kg i.v.) or vehicle was administered to rats (N=6/group) during either phMRI scanning or concurrent imaging of cortical blood flow and recording of local field potentials. Compared to vehicle controls psilocin (2 mg/kg) evoked phMRI signal increases in a number of regions including olfactory and limbic areas and elements of the visual system. PhMRI signal decreases were seen in other regions including somatosensory and motor cortices. Investigation of neurovascular coupling revealed that whilst neuronal responses (local field potentials) to sensory stimuli were decreased in amplitude by psilocin administration, concurrently measured haemodynamic responses (cerebral blood flow) were enhanced. The present findings show that psilocin evoked region-specific changes in phMRI signals in the rat, confirming recent human data. However, the results also suggest that the haemodynamic signal changes underlying phMRI responses reflect changes in both neuronal activity and neurovascular coupling. This highlights the importance of understanding the neurovascular effects of pharmacological manipulations for interpreting haemodynamic neuroimaging data.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral haemodynamics; Functional MRI; Neurovascular; Pharmacological MRI; Psilocin; Psilocybin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26192543 PMCID: PMC4655865 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.07.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuropharmacology ISSN: 0028-3908 Impact factor: 5.250
Anatomical regions showing BOLD signal changes following administration of 2 mg/kg psilocin.
| Increased BOLD signal vs vehicle | Decreased BOLD signal vs vehicle |
|---|---|
| Olfactory and limbic areas | Prelimbic cortex |
| | Cingulate cortex |
| | Primary motor cortex |
| | Secondary motor cortex |
| | Somatosensory cortex |
| Substantia nigra, pars reticulata | |
| Optic tract | Thalamic nuclei |
| Hypothalamic nuclei | |
| Hippocampus | |
| | Dorsolateral periaqueductal grey |
| | Superior colliculus |
| | Entorhinal cortex |
| Cerebral peduncle | Hippocampus |
| Pontine nuclei | |
| | |
| | |
| Lateral and medial habenulae | |
| Visual cortex |
Fig. 1At a dose of 2 mg/kg psilocin produced BOLD signal decreases in the cingulate cortex compared to vehicle treated controls while a dose of 0.03 mg/kg produced no change (A). Signal decreases were also observed at a dose of 2 mg/kg in the somatosensory cortex (C). The same dose produced signal increases in the amygdala and hypothalamus while a dose of 0.03 mg/kg produced no change in the same regions (B). All experimental groups have N = 6.
Fig. 2Changes in BOLD signal magnitude in brain regions identified in Fig. 1. (A–D) Time series changes in the four brain regions showing BOLD activation/deactivation. Dotted lines represent raw traces from individual animals that received a 2 mg/kg dose of psilocin, solid line is the mean of these animals. Blue and red lines represent the mean signal changes from animals that received vehicle or 0.03 mg/kg psilocin, respectively, for comparison. The average traces for these groups have been low pass filtered to improve clarity. (E–H) Percentage change in BOLD signal magnitude relative to baseline for each of the four identified brain regions. The signal magnitude was calculated by averaging over the period from 20 to 35 min after administration of 2 mg/kg psilocin (amygdala, cingulate cortex and somatosensory cortex) or 5–20 min after drug administration (hypothalamus). Error bars represent standard error of the mean. MANOVA performed on the signal magnitude values (as summarised in E–H) revealed a significant effect of drug dose (Hotelling's Trace: df = 8, 22; F = 2.424; p = 0.048). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Treatment with 2 mg/kg psilocin increases the magnitude of the haemodynamic response to whisker stimulation in the somatosensory cortex. In a long stimulation paradigm this was evident in the initial phase of the response where animals that received psilocin had an increased response amplitude (A). The magnitude of the neuronal response in the somatosensory cortex to the same stimulation paradigm was unaltered (B). When shorter stimulations with multiple frequencies were applied this effect was significant only at 10 Hz (1C). Neuronal response magnitude was decreased after psilocin administration at high stimulation frequencies in the short stimulation, mixed frequency paradigm (D). Data are mean ± SEM, N = 6 for psilocin treatment, N = 5 for vehicle treatment.
Summary of statistical analyses of haemodynamic responses to 10 Hz, 16 s duration stimulation. * = p < 0.05.
| Parameter | Factor | df | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum of first phase (0–8 s from stimulation onset) of CBF response to 10 Hz, 16 s duration stimulation | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 5.338 | 0.046* |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 6.632 | 0.030* | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 6.187 | 0.035* | |
| Maximum of second phase (10–20 s from stimulation onset) of CBF response to 10 Hz, 16 s duration stimulation | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 0.033 | 0.861 |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 0.137 | 0.720 | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 2.037 | 0.187 | |
| Time to half maximum CBF response to 10 Hz, 16 s duration stimulation | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 0.198 | 0.667 |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 0.031 | 0.863 | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 0.131 | 0.726 |
Summary of statistical analyses of haemodynamic responses to mixed frequency, 2 s duration stimulation.
| Parameter | Factor | df | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum CBF response to mixed frequency, 2 s duration stimulation | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 2.787 | 0.129 |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 0.524 | 0.488 | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 3.110 | 0.112 | |
| Stimulation frequency | 5,45 | 1.207 | 0.321 | |
| Stimulation frequency × drug treatment interaction | 5,45 | 2.115 | 0.081 | |
| Pre/post drug administration × frequency interaction | 5,45 | 1.965 | 1.02 | |
| Pre/post drug administration × frequency × drug treatment interaction | 5,45 | 1.866 | 0.119 | |
| Time to half maximum CBF response to mixed frequency, 2 s duration stimulation | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 1.314 | 0.281 |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 1.029 | 0.337 | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 1.200 | 0.302 | |
| Stimulation frequency | 5,45 | 1.176 | 0.336 | |
| Stimulation frequency × drug treatment interaction | 5,45 | 0.723 | 0.610 | |
| Pre/post drug administration × frequency interaction | 5,45 | 1.498 | 0.209 | |
| Pre/post drug administration × frequency × drug treatment interaction | 5,45 | 1.800 | 0.132 | |
| Analysis of 10 Hz CBF response data only | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 5.462 | 0.044* |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 3.359 | 0.100 | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 5.125 | 0.050* | |
*=p<0.05.
Summary of statistical analyses of haemodynamic responses to 30 s increased CO2 concentration.
| Parameter | Factor | df | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum CBF response to 30 s increased CO2 concentration | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 2.754 | 0.131 |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 2.805 | 0.128 | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 2.940 | 0.121 |
Fig. 4Average neuronal responses to long, 16 s duration, 10 Hz whisker stimulation were not significantly altered by administration of psilocin. Black lines show response means, coloured bands represent SEM, N = 6 for psilocin treatment, N = 5 for vehicle treatment. (A) The average response to the first pulse in the stimulation train. (B) The average response to all subsequent pulses in the train.
Summary of statistical analyses of neuronal response magnitudes to 10 Hz, 16 s duration stimulation.
| Stimulation frequency | Factor | df | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Hz, 16 s stimulation | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 0.117 | 0.740 |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 0.136 | 0.721 | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 0.172 | 0.688 |
Summary of statistical analyses of neuronal response magnitudes to mixed frequency, 2 s duration stimulation. * = p < 0.0083.
| Stimulation frequency | Factor | df | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed frequency, 2 s stimulation | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 30.539 | <0.001* |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 48.122 | <0.001* | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 111.839 | <0.001* | |
| Stimulation frequency | 1,9 | 3631.889 | <0.001* | |
| Stimulation frequency × drug treatment interaction | 5,45 | 50.504 | <0.001* | |
| Pre/post drug administration × frequency interaction | 5,45 | 21.432 | <0.001* | |
| Pre/post drug administration × frequency × drug treatment interaction | 5,45 | 136.091 | <0.001* | |
| 1 Hz | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 2.009 | 0.187 |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 15.051 | 0.003* | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 44.132 | <0.001* | |
| 2 Hz | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 1.983 | 0.189 |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 80.495 | <0.001* | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 39.832 | <0.001* | |
| 5 Hz | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 2.556 | 0.141 |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 157.101 | <0.001* | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 14.051 | 0.004* | |
| 10 Hz | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 0.458 | 0.514 |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 256.354 | <0.001* | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 33.898 | <0.001* | |
| 20 Hz | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 37.478 | <0.001* |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 3.610 | 0.087 | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 88.602 | <0.001* | |
| 40 Hz | Drug treatment | 1,9 | 69.494 | <0.001* |
| Pre/post drug administration | 1,9 | 29.415 | <0.001* | |
| Drug treatment × Pre/post drug administration interaction | 1,9 | 192.861 | <0.001* | |