| Literature DB >> 26190874 |
Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas1, Svetlana V Doubova2, Laura Angélica Bazaldúa-Merino3, Hortensia Reyes-Morales4, David Martínez5, Roberto Karam6, Carlos Gamez6, Onofre Muñoz-Hernández7.
Abstract
The objective of the study was to design and evaluate a pilot programme aimed at promoting the active ageing of older adults at the Mexican Institute of Social Security. The study was conducted in three stages: (a) design; (b) implementation; and (c) before-after evaluation through analysis of changes in functional status, occupational functioning and health-related quality of life. To overcome the limitations of the study design, we evaluated the effect of 80 per cent adherence to the programme on the outcome variables using the generalised linear regression models (GLM). Two hundred and thirty-nine older adults agreed to participate, of whom 65 per cent completed the programme. Most were women; the average age was 77 years. Adherence to the programme was higher than 75 per cent for the group who completed active ageing services and less than 60 per cent for the drop-out group. Overall, 46 per cent of older adults reached an adherence level of 80 per cent or higher. Adherence was significantly associated with improved quality of life total score (coefficient 2.7, p<0.0001) and occupational functioning total score (coefficient 2.2, p<0.0001). Participation of older adults in an active ageing programme may improve their health-related quality of life and occupational functioning. It is necessary to identify the potential barriers and to implement strategies to improve the recruitment and retention rates during the intervention.Entities:
Keywords: active ageing; health-related quality of life; occupational functioning; pilot programme
Year: 2014 PMID: 26190874 PMCID: PMC4501303 DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X14000361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ageing Soc ISSN: 0144-686X
Content of active ageing services
| Modules | Number and duration of sessions | Type | Activities/themes and techniques |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social therapy | 48 sessions, 1 hour, 30 minutes | Required; interactive theoretical/practical1 group sessions | Major themes: biological changes, self-esteem, empowerment, social networks, prevention of accidents including home safety assessment, elder abuse and legal rights. Techniques: cognitive-behavioural.2 |
| Physical therapy | 24 sessions, 1 hour | Required; interactive theoretical/practical group sessions. |
Qigong, which includes practise of aligning breath, exercises for improving balance and meditation. Multiple-component group exercise that includes aerobic physical activities, progressive resistance strength training that involves all major muscle groups and exercises for improving balance and flexibility. |
| Mental health with two sub-modules: | 24 sessions, 1 hour, 30 minutes (by sub-module) | Selective; interactive theoretical/practical group sessions | A: Psycho-education aims at helping subjects to identify the contributing factors for depression and to deal effectively with the psychological, behavioural, interpersonal and situational contributors. Techniques: psycho-educational.1 Older adults with severe or moderate depression receive 5–8 sessions of individual brief psycho-dynamic psychotherapy before the group sessions. This psychotherapy is aimed at developing an optimal plan to resolve the patient's crisis situation through the use of an initial dynamic interpretation and its working through. |
| Education for self-care with two sub-modules: | A: 24 sessions, 1 hour, 30 minutes | A: Required; interactive theoretical/practical group sessions | A: Part 1, Client-centred occupational therapy based on the model of human occupation (Kielhofner |
| Leisure time and communication with two sub-modules: | A and B: 48 sessions, 1 hour, 30 minutes (by sub-module) | A and B: Optional; interactive theoretical/practical group sessions | A: Education for the proper use of leisure time. |
Notes: 1. Theoretical/practical: theory 15–25 per cent and practice 75–85 per cent of session time. 2. Cognitive-behavioural techniques to facilitate the emergence of desirable behaviours and maintain modified behaviour, such as positive communication, verbal incitement, shaping, generalisation training, reinforcement, motivation self-registration, self-evaluation, self-motivation, self-effort, resolution of problems, among others.
Study outcome variables and their assessment tools
| Outcome variables | Assessment tools and evaluation criteria |
|---|---|
| Basic activities of daily living | |
| Instrumental activities of daily living | |
| Gait and balance | |
| Occupational functioning | |
| Regular physical activities | |
| Health-related quality of life |
Figure 1.Flow of participants.
General characteristics, lifestyle and nutritional status
| Variables | Completed active ageing services | Dropout | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female* | 74.8 | 54.8 | 67.8 |
| Age (years):* | |||
| Median | 76 | 78 | 77 |
| Minimum–maximum | 66–87 | 67–97 | 67–97 |
| Primary school or higher | 58.1 | 60.7 | 59.0 |
| Living with life partner* | 51.0 | 68.7 | 67.1 |
| Having children | 99.4 | 97.6 | 98.7 |
| Having friends | 78.7 | 68.7 | 75.2 |
| Smoking* | 3.2 | 7.1 | 4.6 |
| Alcohol consumption | 7.1 | 9.5 | 7.9 |
| Regular physical activities | 33.5 | 28.6 | 31.8 |
| Nutritional status: | |||
| Malnutrition | 0 | 2.4 | 0.8 |
| Underweight | 4.5 | 3.6 | 4.2 |
| Normal weight | 58.7 | 60.7 | 59.4 |
| Obese | 36.8 | 33.3 | 35.6 |
| N | 155 | 84 | 239 |
Significance level: * p<0.05 (between groups).
Medical history
| Variables | Completed active ageing services | Dropout | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chronic diseases: | 97.4 | 97.6 | 97.5 |
| Median number | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Minimum–maximum number | 0–5 | 0–5 | 0–5 |
| Cardiovascular diseases | 71.0 | 71.4 | 71.1 |
| Musculoskeletal disorders* | 75.5 | 64.3 | 71.5 |
| Gastrointestinal diseases | 29.0 | 31.0 | 29.7 |
| Diabetes | 23.9 | 28.6 | 25.5 |
| Other endocrine diseases | 3.2 | 2.4 | 2.9 |
| Neoplasms | 16.8 | 25.0 | 19.7 |
| Respiratory tract diseases | 7.7 | 9.5 | 8.4 |
| Geriatric syndromes: | 90.3 | 83.3 | 87.9 |
| Median number | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Minimum–maximum number | 0–6 | 0–5 | 0–6 |
| Sensory deprivation | 62.6 | 52.4 | 59.0 |
| Urinary and/or faecal incontinence* | 54.2 | 32.1 | 46.4 |
| Depression | 36.1 | 30.5 | 34.2 |
| Insomnia* | 34.8 | 20.2 | 29.7 |
| Falls* | 16.8 | 29.8 | 21.3 |
| Constipation | 18.7 | 10.7 | 15.9 |
| Orthostatic hypotension* | 18.1 | 2.4 | 12.6 |
| Pain syndrome | 9.7 | 11.9 | 10.5 |
| Cognitive impairment | 5.2 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Syncope | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| N | 155 | 84 | 239 |
Significance level: * p<0.05 (between groups).
Changes in functional status, occupational functioning and health-related quality of life at the end of the active ageing service interventions of the Centre of Social Health Services for Older Adults (COASH) and the association between adherence to the programme and end-line scores in these variables
| Baseline (mean and SD) | End-line (mean and SD) | Changes between end-line and baseline (mean and 95% CI) | Association between ⩾80% adherence to the programme and outcome variables1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional status: | |||||
| Basic activities | 96.3 (6.3) | 96.0 (7.2) | −0.3 (−0.8, 0.2) | −0.1 (−1.1, 0.8) | 0.772 |
| Instrumental activities | 13.08 (3.3) | 13.12 (3.2) | 0.04 (−0.16, 0.24) | 0.03 (−0.36, 0.43) | 0.868 |
| Overall mobility score | 21.4 (3.8) | 21.8 (3.1) | 0.4 (0.2, 10.7)* | 0.3 (−0.16, 0.70) | 0.216 |
| Occupational functioning: | |||||
| Volition | 12.4 (4.0) | 13.6 (2.7) | 1.2 (0.8, 1.96)* | ||
| Habituation | 12.9 (3.4) | 13.9 (2.2) | 1.1 (0.7, 1.4)* | ||
| Communication and interaction skills | 13.2 (3.4) | 14.0 (2.6) | 0.8 (0.4, 1.2)* | 0.3 (−0.2, 0.9) | 0.260 |
| Process skills | 12.7 (3.6) | 14.2 (2.6) | 1.4 (1.0, 1.8)* | 0.3 (−0.3, 0.9) | 0.388 |
| Motor skills | 12.1 (3.9) | 12.9 (3.5) | 0.8 (0.5, 1.1)* | 0.03 (−0.5, 0.6) | 0.923 |
| Environment | 12.8 (3.6) | 13.8 (2.8) | 0.9 (0.6, 1.3)* | −0.05 (−0.6, 0.4) | 0.823 |
| Total score | 76.1 (20.2) | 82.3 (14.6) | 6.2 (4.7, 7.6)* | ||
| Quality of life:2 | |||||
| Physical health | 75.0 (8.8) | 75.6 (9.4) | 0.5 (−0.4, 1.5) | ||
| Psychological | 70.8 (8.5) | 73.4 (8.3) | 2.6 (1.5, 3.6)* | ||
| Social relationships | 76.3 (8.6) | 78.1 (8.5) | 1.9 (0.8, 2.9)* | ||
| Environment | 68.2 (7.2) | 71.7 (7.7) | 3.4 (2.4, 4.4)* | ||
| Total score | 66.3 (5.2) | 68.3 (5.8) | 2.0 (1.3, 2.7)* | ||
| Regular physical activities (%) | 33.5 | 59.4 | 26.8 (26.72, 26.87)* | ||
Notes: N=239. SD: standard deviation. CI: confidence interval. 1. The effect of ⩾80% adherence to COASH in generalised linear regression models with end-line evaluations adjusted for clinically important covariates. The bold values highlight the statistically significant adjusted coefficients. 2.
Significance level: * p<0.001 (between the end-line and baseline measurements).