Lauren B Zapata1, Stephen J Tregear2, Marie Tiller2, Karen Pazol3, Nancy Mautone-Smith4, Loretta E Gavin4. 1. Division of Reproductive Health, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: lzapata@cdc.gov. 2. Manila Consulting Group, Inc., McLean, Virginia. 3. Division of Reproductive Health, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. Office of Population Affairs, USDHHS, Rockville, Maryland.
Abstract
CONTEXT: This systematic review evaluated the evidence on the impact of family planning reminder systems-interventions intended to remind patients of behaviors to achieve reproductive health goals (e.g., daily text messages reminding oral contraceptive [OC] users to take a pill)-to provide information to guide national recommendations on quality family planning services. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Multiple databases including PubMed were searched during 2010-2011 for peer-reviewed articles published in English from January 1985 through February 2011 describing studies evaluating reminder systems to improve family planning outcomes. Studies were excluded if they focused primarily on HIV or sexually transmitted infection prevention, focused solely on men, or were conducted outside the U.S., Europe, Australia, or New Zealand. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The initial search identified 16,129 articles, five of which met the inclusion criteria. Three studies examined the impact of OC reminder systems; two found a statistically significant positive impact on correct use. Two studies examined the impact of reminder systems among depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users; one found a statistically significant positive impact on correct use. CONCLUSIONS: Although mixed support was found for the effectiveness of reminder system interventions on correct use of OCs and DMPA, the highest-quality evidence yielded null findings. The evidence base would be strengthened by the development of additional studies, especially RCTs, which objectively measure outcomes, examine additional contraceptive methods, and have sufficient sample sizes to detect behavioral outcomes at least 12 months post-intervention. Published by Elsevier Inc.
CONTEXT: This systematic review evaluated the evidence on the impact of family planning reminder systems-interventions intended to remind patients of behaviors to achieve reproductive health goals (e.g., daily text messages reminding oral contraceptive [OC] users to take a pill)-to provide information to guide national recommendations on quality family planning services. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Multiple databases including PubMed were searched during 2010-2011 for peer-reviewed articles published in English from January 1985 through February 2011 describing studies evaluating reminder systems to improve family planning outcomes. Studies were excluded if they focused primarily on HIV or sexually transmitted infection prevention, focused solely on men, or were conducted outside the U.S., Europe, Australia, or New Zealand. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The initial search identified 16,129 articles, five of which met the inclusion criteria. Three studies examined the impact of OC reminder systems; two found a statistically significant positive impact on correct use. Two studies examined the impact of reminder systems among depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users; one found a statistically significant positive impact on correct use. CONCLUSIONS: Although mixed support was found for the effectiveness of reminder system interventions on correct use of OCs and DMPA, the highest-quality evidence yielded null findings. The evidence base would be strengthened by the development of additional studies, especially RCTs, which objectively measure outcomes, examine additional contraceptive methods, and have sufficient sample sizes to detect behavioral outcomes at least 12 months post-intervention. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Melissa S Stockwell; Elyse Olshen Kharbanda; Raquel Andres Martinez; Marcos Lara; David Vawdrey; Karthik Natarajan; Vaughn I Rickert Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Marcia Vervloet; Annemiek J Linn; Julia C M van Weert; Dinny H de Bakker; Marcel L Bouvy; Liset van Dijk Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Thiago Martini da Costa; Bárbara Jaqueline Peres Barbosa; Durval Alex Gomes e Costa; Daniel Sigulem; Heimar de Fátima Marin; Adauto Castelo Filho; Ivan Torres Pisa Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Helene Hardy; Vikram Kumar; Gheorghe Doros; Eric Farmer; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Denis Rybin; Dan Myung; Jonathan Jackson; Elke Backman; Anela Stanic; Paul R Skolnik Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Nadia Dowshen; Lisa M Kuhns; Amy Johnson; Brian James Holoyda; Robert Garofalo Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Lauren B Zapata; Stephen J Tregear; Kathryn M Curtis; Marie Tiller; Karen Pazol; Nancy Mautone-Smith; Loretta E Gavin Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Lauren B Zapata; Karen Pazol; Christine Dehlendorf; Kathryn M Curtis; Nikita M Malcolm; Rachel B Rosmarin; Brittni N Frederiksen Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Natasha Mack; Tineke J Crawford; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Mario Chen; Thomas W Grey; Paul J Feldblum; Laurie L Stockton; Maria F Gallo Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-04-23