Literature DB >> 26190390

Total Arterial Revascularization: Achievable and Prognostically Effective-A Multicenter Analysis.

James Tatoulis1, Rochelle Wynne2, Peter D Skillington2, Brian F Buxton3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total arterial revascularization (TAR) is adopted to overcome late vein graft atherosclerosis, and occlusion. Uptake of TAR remains low despite reports suggesting superior survival. Previous studies primarily involved single sites and short-term follow-up. We report the influence of TAR on long-term survival in a large multicenter patient cohort.
METHODS: We reviewed 63,592 cases from an audited collaborative multicenter database. Of those, 34,181 consecutive patients undergoing first-time isolated coronary artery bypass (CABG) from 2001 to 2012 were studied. The data were linked to the National Death Index. We compared outcomes in patients who underwent TAR (n = 12,271) with outcomes in those who did not (n = 21,910). The influence of TAR on 10-year all-cause late mortality was assessed by propensity score analyses in 6,232 matched pairs.
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality was 0.8% (96/12,271) for TAR patients and 1.8% (398/21,910) for non-TAR patients (p < 0.001). Late mortality was 7.5% (918/12,271) for TAR patients and 8.9% (1,952/21,910) for non-TAR patients (p < 0.001). The mean follow-up time was 4.9 years. In the propensity-matched cohort, the perioperative mortality was 0.9% (53/6,232) for TAR patients versus 1.2% (76/6,232) for non-TAR patients (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival in the matched cohort at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97.2%, 91.3%, and 85.4% for TAR patients and 96.5%, 90.1%, and 81.2% for non-TAR patients (p < 0.001). Late mortality was 8.0% (n = 500) for TAR patients and 10.0% (n = 622) for non-TAR patients (p < 0.001). Stratified Cox proportional hazards models showed lower risk for all-cause late mortality in the TAR group (TAR:HR 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.90, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: TAR is associated with low perioperative mortality and, importantly, improved long-term survival and could be used more liberally.
Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26190390     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

1.  Long term outcomes of radial artery grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  James Tatoulis; Thomas A Schwann
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-09

Review 2.  Optimal use of arterial grafts during current coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Suzuki Tomoaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Unsuitability of the radial artery as a bypass conduit after trans radial coronary angiogram.

Authors:  Harinder Singh Bedi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-01-13

Review 4.  Cardiac surgery 2015 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Constanze Strüning; Alexandros Moschovas; David Gonzalez-Lopez; Yasin Essa; Hristo Kirov; Mahmoud Diab; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Fifty years of coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Ludovic Melly; Gianluca Torregrossa; Timothy Lee; Jean-Luc Jansens; John D Puskas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Outcomes of total arterial revascularization vs conventional revascularization in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A narrative review of major studies.

Authors:  Carmelo Dominici; Massimo Chello; Sahrai Saeed
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.340

Review 7.  The impact of advances in percutaneous catheter interventions on redo cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Dhaval Pravin Trivedi; SukeshKumar Reddy Chigarapalli; Deepak Mohan Gangahar; Venkat Ratnam Machiraju
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-09-19

Review 8.  A comparative review of the outcomes of using arterial versus venous conduits in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

Authors:  Mansour Jannati; Mohammad Rafati Navaei; Leila Ghaedian Ronizi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-09-30

9.  Female sex is not a risk factor for post procedural mortality in coronary bypass surgery in the elderly: A secondary analysis of the GOPCABE trial.

Authors:  Gloria Faerber; Michael Zacher; Wilko Reents; Jochen Boergermann; Utz Kappert; Andreas Boening; Anno Diegeler; Torsten Doenst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.