Matthew J Gillespie1, Doff B McElhinney2, Jacqueline Kreutzer3, William E Hellenbrand4, Howaida El-Said5, Peter Ewert6, John F Rhodes7, Lars Søndergaard8, Thomas K Jones9. 1. Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: gillespie@email.chop.edu. 2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 3. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburg Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 5. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Rady Children's Hospital, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California. 6. Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Disease, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, München, Germany. 7. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Miami Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida. 8. Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. 9. Division of Cardiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) conduit dysfunction is a limitation of the Ross procedure. Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) could alter the impact of conduit dysfunction and the risk-benefit balance for the Ross procedure. METHODS: Retrospective review of databases from 3 prospective Melody TPV (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) trials. RESULTS: Among 358 patients who were catheterized with the intent to implant a Melody TPV for RVOT conduit stenosis or regurgitation (PR) as part of 3 prospective multicenter studies, 67 (19%) had a prior Ross procedure. Of these, 56 (84%) received a Melody valve; in 5 of the 11 patients who did not, the implant was aborted due to concern for coronary artery compression, and 1 implanted patient required emergent surgery for left coronary compression. The RVOT gradient decreased from a median 38 mm Hg to 13.5 mm Hg (p < 0.001). There was no or trivial PR in all but 4 patients, in whom it was mild. At a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 1 patient died from sepsis. Twelve patients underwent 14 transcatheter (n = 8) or surgical (n = 6) TPV reinterventions for obstruction with stent fracture (n = 9), endocarditis with conduit obstruction (n = 3), or reoperation (n = 2). Freedom from TPV explant was 89% ± 5% at 4 years. Among patients who did not undergo reintervention for obstruction, there was no change in RVOT gradient over time, and all but 1 patient had mild or less PR at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The TPVR with the Melody valve provides acceptable early outcomes and durable valve function in the majority of Ross patients. Recurrent RVOT obstruction associated with stent fracture was the main reason for reintervention. Coronary compression is not uncommon in Ross patients and should be assessed prior to TPVR.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) conduit dysfunction is a limitation of the Ross procedure. Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) could alter the impact of conduit dysfunction and the risk-benefit balance for the Ross procedure. METHODS: Retrospective review of databases from 3 prospective Melody TPV (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) trials. RESULTS: Among 358 patients who were catheterized with the intent to implant a Melody TPV for RVOT conduit stenosis or regurgitation (PR) as part of 3 prospective multicenter studies, 67 (19%) had a prior Ross procedure. Of these, 56 (84%) received a Melody valve; in 5 of the 11 patients who did not, the implant was aborted due to concern for coronary artery compression, and 1 implanted patient required emergent surgery for left coronary compression. The RVOT gradient decreased from a median 38 mm Hg to 13.5 mm Hg (p < 0.001). There was no or trivial PR in all but 4 patients, in whom it was mild. At a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 1 patient died from sepsis. Twelve patients underwent 14 transcatheter (n = 8) or surgical (n = 6) TPV reinterventions for obstruction with stent fracture (n = 9), endocarditis with conduit obstruction (n = 3), or reoperation (n = 2). Freedom from TPV explant was 89% ± 5% at 4 years. Among patients who did not undergo reintervention for obstruction, there was no change in RVOT gradient over time, and all but 1 patient had mild or less PR at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The TPVR with the Melody valve provides acceptable early outcomes and durable valve function in the majority of Ross patients. Recurrent RVOT obstruction associated with stent fracture was the main reason for reintervention. Coronary compression is not uncommon in Ross patients and should be assessed prior to TPVR.
Authors: Amine Mazine; Rodolfo V Rocha; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Maral Ouzounian; Bobby Yanagawa; Deepak L Bhatt; Subodh Verma; Jan O Friedrich Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Ladonna Malone; Brian Fonseca; Thomas Fagan; Jane Gralla; Neil Wilson; Daniel Vargas; Micheal DiMaria; Uyen Truong; Lorna P Browne Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 1.655