Literature DB >> 26190218

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity.

Kevin Phan1, Prashanth J Rao1, Daniel B Scherman2, Gordon Dandie2, Ralph J Mobbs3.   

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review to assess the safety and clinical and radiological outcomes of the recently introduced, direct or extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) approach for degenerative spinal deformity disorders. Open fusion and instrumentation has traditionally been the mainstay treatment. However, in recent years, there has been an increasing emphasis on minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation techniques, with the aim of minimizing surgical trauma and blood loss and reducing hospitalization. From six electronic databases, 21 eligible studies were included for review. The pooled weighted average mean of preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores was 6.8, compared to a postoperative VAS score of 2.9 (p<0.0001). The weighted average preoperative and postoperative coronal segmental Cobb angles were 3.6 and 1.1°, respectively. The weighted average preoperative and postoperative coronal regional Cobb angles were 19.1 and 10.0°, respectively. Regional lumbar lordosis also significantly improved from 35.8 to 43.3°. Sagittal alignment was comparable pre- and postoperatively (34 mm versus 35.1mm). The weighted average operative duration was 125.6 minutes, whilst the mean estimated blood loss was 155 mL. The weighted average hospitalization length was 3.6 days. Whilst the available data is limited, minimally invasive XLIF procedures appear to be a promising alternative for the treatment of scoliosis, with improved functional VAS and Oswestry disability index outcomes and restored coronal deformity. Future comparative studies are warranted to assess the long term benefits and risks of XLIF compared to anterior and posterior procedures.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct lateral interbody fusion; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive; Spinal deformity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26190218     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  28 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive versus open surgery for the correction of adult degenerative scoliosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Asad M Lak; Nayan Lamba; Farrah Pompilus; Ismaeel Yunusa; Andrella King; Ihtisham Sultan; James Amamoo; Nawaf M Al-Otaibi; Mohammed Alasmari; Iman Zaghloul; Linda Aglio; Christian D Cerecedo-Lopez; Ian Tafel; Timothy R Smith; Rania A Mekary; Hasan Zaidi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Outcomes of Short Fusion versus Long Fusion for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Joshua Xu; Monish M Maharaj; Julian Li; Jun S Kim; John Di Capua; Sulaiman Somani; Kimberly-Anne Tan; Ralph J Mobbs; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 3.  Temporary liver and stomach necrosis after lateral approach for interbody fusion and deformity correction of lumbar spine: report of two cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Haris S Vasiliadis; Regula Teuscher; Mark Kleinschmidt; Susanne Marrè; Paul Heini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 5.  Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Kevin Phan; Greg Malham; Kevin Seex; Prashanth J Rao
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 6.  Comparison of ALIF vs. XLIF for L4/5 interbody fusion: pros, cons, and literature review.

Authors:  Mark J Winder; Shanu Gambhir
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

Review 7.  Lumbar interbody fusion: recent advances in surgical techniques and bone healing strategies.

Authors:  Bin Meng; Joshua Bunch; Douglas Burton; Jinxi Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Morphometric anatomy of the lumbar sympathetic trunk with respect to the anterolateral approach to lumbar interbody fusion: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Gareth Rutter; Kevin Phan; Adam Smith; Fiona Stewart; Kevin Seex; Cristian Gragnaniello
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

9.  Relationship between sagittal balance and adjacent segment disease in surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: meta-analysis and implications for choice of fusion technique.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Alexander Nazareth; Awais K Hussain; Adam A Dmytriw; Mithun Nambiar; Damian Nguyen; Jack Kerferd; Steven Phan; Chet Sutterlin; Samuel K Cho; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of pure lateral and oblique lateral inter-body fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disk disease: a multicentric cohort study.

Authors:  Massimo Miscusi; Alessandro Ramieri; Stefano Forcato; Mary Giuffrè; Sokol Trungu; Marco Cimatti; Alessandro Pesce; Pietro Familiari; Amedeo Piazza; Cristina Carnevali; Giuseppe Costanzo; Antonino Raco
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.