Carol Ann Weis1, John J Triano2, Jon Barrett3, Michelle D Campbell4, Martine Croy5, Jessica Roeder6. 1. Chiropractor, Researcher, Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: cweis@cmcc.ca. 2. Professor, Graduate Education and Research Department, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Chief of Maternal Fetal Medicine Program, Maternal Fetal Medicine and Program Research Director of Womens and Babies, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Chiropractor, Private Practice, London, Ontario, Canada. 5. Chiropractor, Private Practice, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 6. Chiropractor, Private Practice, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect size in measurable change of abdominal musculature morphology using ultrasonography in postpartum women within 1 month of a healthy, vaginal delivery. METHODS: One hundred fifty-six participants were recruited for this study. B-mode ultrasound imaging was used to measure abdominal muscle thickness on 80 nulliparous women and 76 mothers who had delivered within the past 4 weeks. Measures were taken for the upper and lower rectus abdominus, external and internal obliques, and transversus abdominus at rest. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found in the thickness of the rectus abdominus muscle at both sites; upper (P < .0001) and lower (P < .0001) as well as the internal oblique (P < .0001). All 3 muscles were thinner in postpartum participants (8.29 ± 1.83 mm, 8.89 ± 2.29 mm, and 7.06 ± 1.82 mm, respectively) within the first month of delivery than in controls (10.82 ± 1.93 mm, 11.13 ± 2.38 mm, and 8.36 ± 1.87 mm, respectively). Large effect sizes were found for the influence of pregnancy on the rectus muscle segments (1.35 for the upper rectus abdominus and 1.00 for the lower rectus abdominus) and a medium effect size for the internal oblique (0.71). No significant differences were observed in the remaining 2 muscles. CONCLUSION: This study showed that there are differences in morphology of the abdominal muscles in pregnant women vs nonpregnant controls. The large effect sizes reported may provide the basis for future studies examining relationships between morphology, functional change, and back pain during pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect size in measurable change of abdominal musculature morphology using ultrasonography in postpartum women within 1 month of a healthy, vaginal delivery. METHODS: One hundred fifty-six participants were recruited for this study. B-mode ultrasound imaging was used to measure abdominal muscle thickness on 80 nulliparous women and 76 mothers who had delivered within the past 4 weeks. Measures were taken for the upper and lower rectus abdominus, external and internal obliques, and transversus abdominus at rest. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found in the thickness of the rectus abdominus muscle at both sites; upper (P < .0001) and lower (P < .0001) as well as the internal oblique (P < .0001). All 3 muscles were thinner in postpartum participants (8.29 ± 1.83 mm, 8.89 ± 2.29 mm, and 7.06 ± 1.82 mm, respectively) within the first month of delivery than in controls (10.82 ± 1.93 mm, 11.13 ± 2.38 mm, and 8.36 ± 1.87 mm, respectively). Large effect sizes were found for the influence of pregnancy on the rectus muscle segments (1.35 for the upper rectus abdominus and 1.00 for the lower rectus abdominus) and a medium effect size for the internal oblique (0.71). No significant differences were observed in the remaining 2 muscles. CONCLUSION: This study showed that there are differences in morphology of the abdominal muscles in pregnant women vs nonpregnant controls. The large effect sizes reported may provide the basis for future studies examining relationships between morphology, functional change, and back pain during pregnancy.
Authors: Russell Hendrycks; Meng Yang; Robert Hitchcock; Monika Leitner; Stefan Niederauer; Ingrid E Nygaard; Xiaoming Sheng; Janet M Shaw Journal: Physiother Theory Pract Date: 2019-11-05 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Jacek Cholewicki; Angela S Lee; John M Popovich; Lawrence W Mysliwiec; Michael D Winkelpleck; John N Flood; Pramod K Pathak; Kiilani H Kaaikala; N Peter Reeves; Ralph Kothe Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 3.241
Authors: Mako Fukano; Yuka Tsukahara; Seira Takei; Sayaka Nose-Ogura; Tomoyuki Fujii; Suguru Torii Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ingrid E Nygaard; Janet M Shaw; Jie Wang; Xiaoming Sheng; Meng Yang; Stefan Niederauer; Robert Hitchcock Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 1.913
Authors: Antonio Corvino; Dario De Rosa; Carolina Sbordone; Antonio Nunziata; Fabio Corvino; Carlo Varelli; Orlando Catalano Journal: Pol J Radiol Date: 2019-12-15