Literature DB >> 26189688

Introduction: Why is intrapartum foetal monitoring necessary - Impact on outcomes and interventions.

Diogo Ayres-de-Campos1.   

Abstract

Maintaining maternal oxygen supply is essential for foetal life, and labour constitutes an increased challenge to this. Good clinical judgement is required to evaluate the signs of reduced foetal oxygenation, to diagnose the underlying cause, to judge the reversibility of the condition and to determine the best timing for delivery. The main aim of intrapartum foetal monitoring is to identify foetuses that are being inadequately oxygenated, enabling appropriate action before the occurrence of injury. It is also to provide reassurance in cases of adequate foetal oxygenation, and thus to avoid unnecessary obstetric intervention. Poor foetal oxygenation is diagnosed by documenting metabolic acidosis in the umbilical cord immediately after birth or in the newborn circulation during the first minutes of life. However, most newborns recover quickly, and they do not develop relevant short- or long-term complications. Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy is the short-term neurological dysfunction caused by inadequate intrapartum foetal oxygenation, and cerebral palsy of the spastic quadriplegic or dyskinetic types is the long-term neurological complication most commonly associated with it. Although there is insufficient evidence from randomised controlled trials to demonstrate that any form of intrapartum foetal monitoring reduces the incidence of adverse outcomes, reports from the clinical setting have documented a decrease in metabolic acidosis, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy and intrapartum death over the last decades. It may be difficult to demonstrate the benefit of diagnostic techniques in complex environments such as the labour ward, but a reduction in the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes constitutes important evidence that intrapartum foetal monitoring makes a difference.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiotocography; foetal; foetal oxygenation; heart rate; monitoring; physiologic

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26189688     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  4 in total

1.  Perpetuating Myths, Fables, and Fairy Tales: A Half Century of Electronic Fetal Monitoring.

Authors:  Thomas P Sartwelle; James C Johnston; Berna Arda
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2015-11-20

Review 2.  A half century of electronic fetal monitoring and bioethics: silence speaks louder than words.

Authors:  Thomas P Sartwelle; James C Johnston; Berna Arda
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2017-11-21

3.  Determinants of neonatal near-miss among neonates delivered in public hospitals of Ilu Abba Bor Zone, Southwest Ethiopia: An unmatched case-control study during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Gebiso Roba Debele; Sabit Zenu Siraj; Dereje Tsegaye; Ermiyas Temesgen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-20

4.  Evaluation of an external fetal electrocardiogram monitoring system: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martha Monson; Cara Heuser; Brett D Einerson; Isaac Esplin; Greg Snow; Michael Varner; M Sean Esplin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 8.661

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.