Literature DB >> 26189572

Chondrosarcomas of the hands and feet: A case series and systematic review of the literature.

Laura M Fayad1, Shivani Ahlawat2, Muhammed Shayan Khan3, Edward McCarthy4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the imaging features of chondrosarcomas (CS) of the hands and feet, with pathologic correlation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 24 histologically-confirmed CS of the hands (n=14) and feet (n=10), 23 studies were retrospectively reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus. Radiographs (n=23), bone scintigrams (n=2), and magnetic resonance (MR) (n=7) images were evaluated for lesion location, cortical and medullary involvement, presence of perilesional signal abnormalities and soft tissue masses (STM). Pathologic specimens were reviewed for tumor grade (grade 1-3). Descriptive statistics were reported.
RESULTS: CS occurred in adults (age range 32-92) and most were located in the digits (22/23 (95.6%)) rather than tarsal/carpal bones (1/23 (4.4%)). For digital CS, 21/22 (95.45%) involved the epiphysis in addition to the metadiaphysis, 22/23 (95.6%) exhibited >2/3 endosteal scalloping, and 16/23 (69.5%) were expansile (>50% of the bone width). Pathologic fractures (7/23 (30.4%)) and STMs (16/23 (69.6%)) were frequent. By MR, perilesional abnormalities were common (bone marrow edema in 6/7 (85%), soft tissue edema in 5/7 (71.4%), STM in 7/7 (100%)). Following contrast administration (n=6), there was solid (3/6 (50%)) or lobular (3/6 (50%)) enhancement. Bone scintigrams showed increased uptake on all phases (>anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS)). Pathology specimens revealed 17 grade 2 and 7 grade 3CS, with increased cellularity, necrosis and myxoid features.
CONCLUSION: CS of the hands and feet have common distinctive features, including involvement of the end-of-bone, significant endosteal scalloping, expansile appearance, a frequent STM, and intermediate to high grade histologic features. Additional aggressive imaging features are identified by MR (perilesional signal abnormalities) and bone scintigraphy (increased uptake>ASIS) that may be helpful clues to the diagnosis.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chondrosarcoma; Feet; Hands; MRI; Nuclear scintigraphy; Radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26189572     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  6 in total

1.  Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation: 16 Cases with a focus on histologic variability.

Authors:  Margaret Cocks; Elizabeth Helmke; Carolyn A Meyers; Laura Fayad; Edward McCarthy; Aaron W James
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-31

Review 2.  [Foot and ankle tumours : Part II: Malignant bone tumours and soft tissue tumours of the foot with differential diagnostic hints].

Authors:  T Grieser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Malignant tumours of the foot and ankle.

Authors:  E Mascard; N Gaspar; L Brugières; C Glorion; S Pannier; A Gomez-Brouchet
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-05-11

Review 4.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Role in the Differentiation Between Atypical Cartilaginous Tumors and High-Grade Chondrosarcoma: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Salah M Alhumaid; Alwaleed Alharbi; Hamad Aljubair
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-10-29

5.  Can MRI differentiate between atypical cartilaginous tumors and high-grade chondrosarcoma? A systematic review.

Authors:  Claudia Deckers; Maarten J Steyvers; Gerjon Hannink; H W Bart Schreuder; Jacky W J de Rooy; Ingrid C M Van Der Geest
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 6.  Update on the imaging features of the enchondromatosis syndromes.

Authors:  Ban Sharif; Daniel Lindsay; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.