Literature DB >> 26189138

Bipolar Button Transurethral Enucleation of Prostate in Benign Prostate Hypertrophy Treatment: A New Surgical Technique.

Roberto Giulianelli1, Barbara Gentile1, Luca Albanesi1, Paola Tariciotti2, Gabriella Mirabile1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transurethral bipolar enucleation with a button electrode (B-TUEP) for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2011 and March 2012, a single surgeon performed 50 B-TUEP. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included prostate-specific antigen, International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), quality of life (QoL) index, uroflowmetry with postvoiding residual (PVR) urinary volume, and prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography. Intraoperatively, we evaluated B-TUEP time (enucleation and resection time). Perioperatively, we evaluated hemoglobin dosage, bladder irrigation time, catheterization time, acute urinary retention events, length of stay, patient readmission, and any endoscopic retreatments.
RESULTS: Three months after surgery, 82% of the patients presented a significant improvement in maximum urine flow (Qmax; P <.001). At 6 and 12 months, 80% and 83.3% of patients maintained the significant improvement (P <.001). The secondary end points IPSS, QoL, IIEF-5, and PVR presented a statistically significant improvement compared with baseline values. No significant change in hemoglobin values was observed before and after surgery. Bladder irrigation time was comprised between 24 and 36 hours for about 80% of patients. In one case, second-look hemostatic endoscopy was needed. Length of stay after surgery was <48 hours in 88% of cases. Readmission was required for 6% of patients for hematuria, and 6 months later, 2 other patients developed bladder neck contracture treated with transurethral incision of the prostate.
CONCLUSION: B-TUEP using the Gyrus PK system is a rapid and safety technique with optimal outcomes.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26189138     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

1.  Endoscopic enucleation for prostate larger than 60 mL: comparison between holmium laser enucleation and plasmakinetic enucleation.

Authors:  P- M Patard; M Roumiguie; S Sanson; J- B Beauval; E Huyghe; M Soulié; B Malavaud; X Gamé; P Rischmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Multivariate Analysis of the Failure of Removal of the Urinary Catheter within 48 Hours after Transurethral Enucleation and Resection of the Prostate.

Authors:  Yukun Wu; Binshen Chen; Chunxiao Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate: Is it a size-independent endoscopic treatment option for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia?

Authors:  Carolina Bebi; Matteo Turetti; Elena Lievore; Francesco Ripa; Lorenzo Rocchini; Matteo Giulio Spinelli; Elisa De Lorenzis; Giancarlo Albo; Fabrizio Longo; Franco Gadda; Paolo Guido Dell'Orto; Andrea Salonia; Emanuele Montanari; Luca Boeri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy vs bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate in large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a two-center 3-year comparison.

Authors:  Riccardo Lombardo; Anton Zarraonandia Andraca; Cristina Plaza Alonso; Juan Andres González-Dacal; Higinio Rodríguez Núñez; Aaron Barreiro Mallo; Barbara Cristina Gentile; Giorgia Tema; Luca Albanesi; Luca Mavilla; Valeria Baldassarri; Cosimo De Nunzio; Andrea Tubaro; Manuel Ruibal Moldes; Roberto Giulianelli
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.