Literature DB >> 26188577

Genomic prediction of dry matter intake in dairy cattle from an international data set consisting of research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia.

Y de Haas1, J E Pryce2, M P L Calus3, E Wall4, D P Berry5, P Løvendahl6, N Krattenmacher7, F Miglior8, K Weigel9, D Spurlock10, K A Macdonald11, B Hulsegge3, R F Veerkamp3.   

Abstract

With the aim of increasing the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values for dry matter intake (DMI) in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle, data from 10 research herds in Europe, North America, and Australasia were combined. The DMI records were available on 10,701 parity 1 to 5 records from 6,953 cows, as well as on 1,784 growing heifers. Predicted DMI at 70 d in milk was used as the phenotype for the lactating animals, and the average DMI measured during a 60- to 70-d test period at approximately 200 d of age was used as the phenotype for the growing heifers. After editing, there were 583,375 genetic markers obtained from either actual high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes or imputed from 54,001 marker SNP genotypes. Genetic correlations between the populations were estimated using genomic REML. The accuracy of genomic prediction was evaluated for the following scenarios: (1) within-country only, by fixing the correlations among populations to zero, (2) using near-unity correlations among populations and assuming the same trait in each population, and (3) a sharing data scenario using estimated genetic correlations among populations. For these 3 scenarios, the data set was divided into 10 sub-populations stratified by progeny group of sires; 9 of these sub-populations were used (in turn) for the genomic prediction and the tenth was used for calculation of the accuracy (correlation adjusted for heritability). A fourth scenario to quantify the benefit for countries that do not record DMI was investigated (i.e., having an entire country as the validation population and excluding this country in the development of the genomic predictions). The optimal scenario, which was sharing data, resulted in a mean prediction accuracy of 0.44, ranging from 0.37 (Denmark) to 0.54 (the Netherlands). Assuming near-unity among-country genetic correlations, the mean accuracy of prediction dropped to 0.40, and the mean within-country accuracy was 0.30. If no records were available in a country, the accuracy based on the other populations ranged from 0.23 to 0.53 for the milking cows, but were only 0.03 and 0.19 for Australian and New Zealand heifers, respectively; the overall mean prediction accuracy was 0.37. Therefore, there is a benefit in collaboration, because phenotypic information for DMI from other countries can be used to augment the accuracy of genomic evaluations of individual countries.
Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dry matter intake; genomic prediction; international collaboration; multi-trait genomic REML; validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26188577     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-9257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

1.  Use of Large and Diverse Datasets for 1H NMR Serum Metabolic Profiling of Early Lactation Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Timothy D W Luke; Jennie E Pryce; Aaron C Elkins; William J Wales; Simone J Rochfort
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2020-04-30

2.  Effects of Incorporating Dry Matter Intake and Residual Feed Intake into a Selection Index for Dairy Cattle Using Deterministic Modeling.

Authors:  Kerry Houlahan; Flavio S Schenkel; Dagnachew Hailemariam; Jan Lassen; Morten Kargo; John B Cole; Erin E Connor; Silvia Wegmann; Oliveira Junior; Filippo Miglior; Allison Fleming; Tatiane C S Chud; Christine F Baes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency.

Authors:  Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Iona M MacLeod; Majid Khansefid; Leah C Marett; William J Wales; Filippo Miglior; Christine F Baes; Flavio S Schenkel; Erin E Connor; Coralia I V Manzanilla-Pech; Paul Stothard; Emily Herman; Gert J Nieuwhof; Michael E Goddard; Jennie E Pryce
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  Semi-supervised learning for genomic prediction of novel traits with small reference populations: an application to residual feed intake in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Chen Yao; Xiaojin Zhu; Kent A Weigel
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Disentangling the relative roles of resource acquisition and allocation on animal feed efficiency: insights from a dairy cow model.

Authors:  Laurence Puillet; Denis Réale; Nicolas C Friggens
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.297

Review 6.  Genomic Selection and Use of Molecular Tools in Breeding Programs for Indigenous and Crossbred Cattle in Developing Countries: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Raphael Mrode; Julie M K Ojango; A M Okeyo; Joram M Mwacharo
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.599

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.