Gabe de Vries1, Maarten W J Koeter2, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen3, Hiske L Hees4, Aart H Schene5. 1. Program for Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Arkin/Roads, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Gabe.devries@amc.uva.nl. 2. Program for Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Program for Mood Disorders, Pro Persona, Arnhem, The Netherlands. 5. Program for Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to (i) assess work functioning in employees returning to work with a major depression in remission, (ii) study the predictors of impaired work functioning. METHODS: Participants diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD), on long term sick leave (mean 27 weeks) and treated in a specialized mental healthcare setting, were selected from an intervention study sample. They were eligible for this study if they were remitted from their depression and had returned to work for at least 50% of their contract hours at 18 month follow-up. Work functioning was assessed with the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) and the Need For Recovery scale (NFR). Potential predictors of impaired work functioning were demographic characteristics (assessed at baseline), health characteristics (assessed at baseline, six and twelve month follow-up), and personality- and work characteristics (assessed at 18 month follow-up). RESULTS: After their return to work with MDD in remission, employees were on average still impaired in their work functioning. Personality characteristics were the strongest predictor of this impaired work functioning, followed by health and work characteristics. In the final prediction model, only a passive reaction coping style remained as predictor. LIMITATIONS: We used self-report data with respect to work functioning and work characteristics and not an assessment by a supervisor. CONCLUSIONS: Personality trait, coping style, and ability to manage the work environment should be addressed in mental health and return-to-work interventions. Subsequent improved work functioning may be beneficial for mental health and may reduce societal costs.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to (i) assess work functioning in employees returning to work with a major depression in remission, (ii) study the predictors of impaired work functioning. METHODS:Participants diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD), on long term sick leave (mean 27 weeks) and treated in a specialized mental healthcare setting, were selected from an intervention study sample. They were eligible for this study if they were remitted from their depression and had returned to work for at least 50% of their contract hours at 18 month follow-up. Work functioning was assessed with the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) and the Need For Recovery scale (NFR). Potential predictors of impaired work functioning were demographic characteristics (assessed at baseline), health characteristics (assessed at baseline, six and twelve month follow-up), and personality- and work characteristics (assessed at 18 month follow-up). RESULTS: After their return to work with MDD in remission, employees were on average still impaired in their work functioning. Personality characteristics were the strongest predictor of this impaired work functioning, followed by health and work characteristics. In the final prediction model, only a passive reaction coping style remained as predictor. LIMITATIONS: We used self-report data with respect to work functioning and work characteristics and not an assessment by a supervisor. CONCLUSIONS: Personality trait, coping style, and ability to manage the work environment should be addressed in mental health and return-to-work interventions. Subsequent improved work functioning may be beneficial for mental health and may reduce societal costs.
Authors: Hanneke E M van der Hoek-Snieders; Monique Boymans; Bas Sorgdrager; Wouter A Dreschler Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2020-06-07 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Carolyn S Dewa; Jaap van Weeghel; Margot C W Joosen; Petra C Gronholm; Evelien P M Brouwers Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Kristel Weerdesteijn; Frederieke Schaafsma; Karin Bonefaas-Groenewoud; Martijn Heymans; Allard Van der Beek; Johannes Anema Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 3.390