Literature DB >> 26188337

Median sternotomy.

Diana Reser1, Etem Caliskan2, Herman Tolboom2, Andrea Guidotti2, Francesco Maisano2.   

Abstract

Sternotomy is considered to be the gold standard incision in cardiac surgery, resulting in low failure rates and excellent proven long-term outcomes. It can also be used in thoracic surgery for mediastinal, bilateral pulmonary or lower trachea and main stem bronchus surgery. Sternotomy has to be performed properly to avoid short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. The surgical technique is well established and certain principles are recognized to be crucial to minimize complications. The identification of the correct landmarks, midline tissue preparation, osteotomy with the avoidance of injury to underlying structures like pleura, pericardium, innominate vein, brachiocephalic artery and ectatic ascending aorta, and targeted bleeding control are important steps of the procedure. As important as the performance of a proper sternotomy is a correct sternal closure. An override or shift of the sternal edges has to be avoided by placing the wires at a proper distance from each other without injuring the thoracic pedicle. The two sternal halves have to be tightly re-approximated to facilitate healing of the bone and to avoid instability, which is a risk factor for wound infection. With a proper performance of sternotomy and sternal closure, instability and wound infections are rare and depend on patient-related risk factors.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional cardiac surgery; Sternotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26188337     DOI: 10.1093/mmcts/mmv017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1813-9175


  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of robotic versus open and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for thymectomy.

Authors:  Katie E O'Sullivan; Usha S Kreaden; April E Hebert; Donna Eaton; Karen C Redmond
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-03

2.  Minimally invasive versus conventional surgery of the ascending aorta and root: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tom A Rayner; Sean Harrison; Paul Rival; Dominic E Mahoney; Massimo Caputo; Gianni D Angelini; Jelena Savović; Hunaid A Vohra
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  90-Day Patient-Centered Outcomes after Totally Endoscopic Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jade Claessens; Alaaddin Yilmaz; Toon Mostien; Silke Van Genechten; Marithé Claes; Loren Packlé; Maud Pierson; Jeroen Vandenbrande; Abdullah Kaya; Björn Stessel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Comparing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation and Conventional Dressings for Sternal Wound Reconstructions.

Authors:  Saeed A Chowdhry; Bradon J Wilhelmi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-01-04

Review 5.  Patient-Tailored Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Ole De Backer; Ivan Wong; Ben Wilkins; Christian Lildal Carranza; Lars Søndergaard
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-04-21

6.  The use of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and rating scale to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes of totally thoracoscopic cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Ling-Chen Huang; Dao-Zhong Chen; Liang-Wan Chen; Qi-Chen Xu; Zi-He Zheng; Xiao-Fu Dai
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 1.637

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.