Literature DB >> 26188260

Reading visually embodied meaning from the brain: Visually grounded computational models decode visual-object mental imagery induced by written text.

Andrew James Anderson1, Elia Bruni2, Alessandro Lopopolo2, Massimo Poesio3, Marco Baroni2.   

Abstract

Embodiment theory predicts that mental imagery of object words recruits neural circuits involved in object perception. The degree of visual imagery present in routine thought and how it is encoded in the brain is largely unknown. We test whether fMRI activity patterns elicited by participants reading objects' names include embodied visual-object representations, and whether we can decode the representations using novel computational image-based semantic models. We first apply the image models in conjunction with text-based semantic models to test predictions of visual-specificity of semantic representations in different brain regions. Representational similarity analysis confirms that fMRI structure within ventral-temporal and lateral-occipital regions correlates most strongly with the image models and conversely text models correlate better with posterior-parietal/lateral-temporal/inferior-frontal regions. We use an unsupervised decoding algorithm that exploits commonalities in representational similarity structure found within both image model and brain data sets to classify embodied visual representations with high accuracy (8/10) and then extend it to exploit model combinations to robustly decode different brain regions in parallel. By capturing latent visual-semantic structure our models provide a route into analyzing neural representations derived from past perceptual experience rather than stimulus-driven brain activity. Our results also verify the benefit of combining multimodal data to model human-like semantic representations.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Concept representation; Embodiment; Language; Mental imagery; Multimodal semantic models; Perceptual simulation; Representational similarity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26188260     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  14 in total

1.  Neural representations of the concepts in simple sentences: Concept activation prediction and context effects.

Authors:  Marcel Adam Just; Jing Wang; Vladimir L Cherkassky
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Decoding semantic representations from functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals.

Authors:  Benjamin D Zinszer; Laurie Bayet; Lauren L Emberson; Rajeev D S Raizada; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.593

3.  An Integrated Neural Decoder of Linguistic and Experiential Meaning.

Authors:  Andrew James Anderson; Jeffrey R Binder; Leonardo Fernandino; Colin J Humphries; Lisa L Conant; Rajeev D S Raizada; Feng Lin; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Grounding the neurobiology of language in first principles: The necessity of non-language-centric explanations for language comprehension.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Giovanna Egidi; Marco Marelli; Roel M Willems
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-07-24

5.  Deep Artificial Neural Networks Reveal a Distributed Cortical Network Encoding Propositional Sentence-Level Meaning.

Authors:  Andrew James Anderson; Douwe Kiela; Jeffrey R Binder; Leonardo Fernandino; Colin J Humphries; Lisa L Conant; Rajeev D S Raizada; Scott Grimm; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Sensorimotor experience and verb-category mapping in human sensory, motor and parietal neurons.

Authors:  Ying Yang; Michael Walsh Dickey; Julie Fiez; Brian Murphy; Tom Mitchell; Jennifer Collinger; Elizabeth Tyler-Kabara; Michael Boninger; Wei Wang
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  A Distributed Network for Multimodal Experiential Representation of Concepts.

Authors:  Jiaqing Tong; Jeffrey R Binder; Colin Humphries; Stephen Mazurchuk; Lisa L Conant; Leonardo Fernandino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 6.709

8.  Inferior parietal lobule is sensitive to different semantic similarity relations for concrete and abstract words.

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; Paola Pinti; Ettore Ambrosini; Ilias Tachtsidis; David Vinson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 4.348

9.  Feature-Specific Event-Related Potential Effects to Action- and Sound-Related Verbs during Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Margot Popp; Natalie M Trumpp; Markus Kiefer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Using stochastic language models (SLM) to map lexical, syntactic, and phonological information processing in the brain.

Authors:  Alessandro Lopopolo; Stefan L Frank; Antal van den Bosch; Roel M Willems
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.