Literature DB >> 26188195

Comparative cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of 13 drinking water disinfection by-products using a microplate-based cytotoxicity assay and a developed SOS/umu assay.

Shao-Hui Zhang1, Dong-Yue Miao2, Li Tan2, Ai-Lin Liu3, Wen-Qing Lu2.   

Abstract

The implications of disinfection by-products (DBPs) present in drinking water are of public health concern because of their potential mutagenic, carcinogenic and other toxic effects on humans. In this study, we selected 13 main DBPs found in drinking water to quantitatively analyse their cytotoxicity and genotoxicity using a microplate-based cytotoxicity assay and a developed SOS/umu assay in Salmonella typhimurium TA1535/pSK1002. With the developed SOS/umu test, eight DBPs: 3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2[5H]-fura3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2-[5H]-furanone (MX), dibromoacetonitrile (DBN), iodoacetic acid (IA), bromochloroacetonitrile (BCN), bromoacetic acid (BA), trichloroacetonitrile (TCN), dibromoacetic acid (DBA) and dichloroacetic acid (DCA) were significantly genotoxic to S. typhimurium. Three DBPs: chloroacetic acid (CA), trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and dichloroacetonitrile (DCN) were weakly genotoxic, whereas the remaining DBPs: chloroacetonitrile (CN) and chloral hydrate (CH) were negative. The rank order in decreasing genotoxicity was as follows: MX > DBN > IA > BCN > BA > TCN > DBA > DCA > CA, TCA, DCN > CN, CH. MX was approximately 370 000 times more genotoxic than DCA. In the microplate-based cytotoxicity assay, cytotoxic potencies of the 13 DBPs were compared and ranked in decreasing order as follows: MX > IA > DBN > BCN > BA > TCN > DCN > CA > DCA > DBA > CN > TCA > CH. MX was approximately 19 200 times more cytotoxic than CH. A statistically significant correlation was found between cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the 13 DBPs in S. typhimurium. Results suggest that microplate-based cytotoxicity assay and the developed SOS/umu assay are feasible tools for analysing the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of DBPs, particularly for comparing their toxic intensities quantitatively.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26188195     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gev053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  5 in total

1.  The toxic influence of dibromoacetic acid on the hippocampus and pre-frontal cortex of rat: involvement of neuroinflammation response and oxidative stress.

Authors:  Wenbo Jiang; Bai Li; Yingying Chen; Shuying Gao
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.584

2.  Degradation of haloacetic acids with the Fenton-like and analysis by GC-MS: use of bioassays for monitoring of genotoxic, mutagenic and cytotoxic effects.

Authors:  Amanda Oliveira Mourão; Diego Francis Silva; Mariandry Rodriguez; Thamyris Souza Torres; Elton Santos Franco; Valter Lúcio Pádua; Márcia Cristina da Silva Faria; Luiz Fernando Oliveira Maia; Jairo Lisboa Rodrigues
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Pyrogenic carbon-promoted haloacetic acid decarboxylation to trihalomethanes in drinking water.

Authors:  Pamela Rose V Samonte; Zhao Li; Jingdong Mao; Brian P Chaplin; Wenqing Xu
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 13.400

4.  New Perspectives for Cancer Hazard Evaluation by the Report on Carcinogens: A Case Study Using Read-Across Methods in the Evaluation of Haloacetic Acids Found as Water Disinfection By-Products.

Authors:  Stanley T Atwood; Ruth M Lunn; Sanford C Garner; Gloria D Jahnke
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  The drinking water contaminant dibromoacetonitrile delays G1-S transition and suppresses Chk1 activation at broken replication forks.

Authors:  Thomas Caspari; James Dyer; Nathalie Fenner; Christian Dunn; Chris Freeman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.