| Literature DB >> 26187477 |
Yutaka Kimura1, Chizu Fujimura1, Yumiko Ito1, Toshiya Takahashi1, Yoshihiro Nakajima1, Yoshihiro Ohmiya1, Setsuya Aiba2.
Abstract
We previously reported a dataset of the IL-8 Luc assay covering reference chemicals published by ECVAM, in which the effects of chemicals on IL-8 promoter activity were evaluated by an IL-8 reporter cell line, THP-G8 cells. To clarify its performance, we created another dataset of 88 sensitizers and 34 non-sensitizers. Simultaneously, to improve its performance, we changed the incubation time from 5 h to 16 h, deleted the criterion regarding the effects of N-acetylcysteine, and set an exclusion criterion for detergents. These modifications significantly improved its performance. In addition, we examined the following three criteria to judge chemicals as sensitizers: Criterion 1: Fold induction of SLO luciferase activity (FlnSLO-LA)⩾1.4, Criterion 2: the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of FInSLO-LA⩾1.0, Criterion 3: the intersection of criteria 1 and 2. Among them, Criterion 1 produced the best performance, demonstrating that the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 81%, 79%, and 90%, respectively. In addition, we found that the IL-8 Luc assay solubilizing chemicals with X-VIVO substantially improved its performance. Finally, the IL-8 Luc assay combined with DPRA and DEREK could improve substantially its performance. These data suggest that the IL-8 Luc assay is a promising test method to screen skin sensitizers.Entities:
Keywords: Alternative method; Contact dermatitis; Luciferase assay; Sensitization test; Skin sensitization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26187477 DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.07.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol In Vitro ISSN: 0887-2333 Impact factor: 3.500