BACKGROUND: Mediocre donation rates and increasing demand for lung transplantation leads transplant centers to consider extended-criteria donor lungs. Arguably, the largest remaining non-utilized lung donor segment is the elderly individual, already considered for visceral organ donation but not thoracic. So far, transplantation of donor lungs aged ≥ 70 years is rarely reported, and recipient outcomes are unknown. Accordingly, we report a single-center series of lung transplantations from donors aged ≥ 70 years and compare outcomes with contemporary lung transplantations from younger donors. METHODS: All bilateral lung transplantations performed at our center between March 2011 and July 2014 were analyzed, and 2 cohorts were built according to lung donor age. RESULTS: A total of 440 bilateral lung transplantations were performed from 413 donors aged <70 years, and 27 donors aged ≥70 years. Donor characteristics did not differ in sex, donor time on mechanical ventilation before retrieval, or donor partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio. Older donors were significantly less often positive for smoking history (43.7% vs 14.8%, p = 0.003) or for abnormal bronchoscopy results (52.9% vs 15.8%, p = 0.002). Recipients receiving donor lungs aged <70 years were younger than those receiving older donor lungs ≥ 70 (49.8 [range, 35-58] vs 58 [range, 53-62] years, p < 0.0001). Underlying diagnoses did not differ significantly between the groups. Post-operative mechanical ventilation times (15 [range, 10-59] vs 27.5 [range, 10-75.8] hours), intensive care unit stays (3 [range, 1-5] vs 3 [range, 1-8] days), and total hospital lengths of stay (24 [range, 22-40.5] vs 24 [range, 22-40] days) of the recipients did not differ significantly between the two groups. The percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 86.5% ± 26.2% 12 months after transplantation of younger lungs vs 72.2% ± 23.8% (p = 0.01) after transplantation of older lungs. Differentiating the spirometry findings according to underlying diseases showed significantly lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second values after transplantation of donor lungs aged ≥70 only in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis recipients but not in emphysema patients. Patient survival up to 36 months was not significantly different, with 1-year survival being 92.9% for younger vs 95.5% for older donor lungs. CONCLUSION: Use of donor lungs aged ≥70 years for transplantation is safe, without compromising survival. However, spirometry findings after transplantation with donors ≥70 years indicate better functional outcomes in emphysema recipients than in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis recipients.
BACKGROUND: Mediocre donation rates and increasing demand for lung transplantation leads transplant centers to consider extended-criteria donor lungs. Arguably, the largest remaining non-utilized lung donor segment is the elderly individual, already considered for visceral organ donation but not thoracic. So far, transplantation of donor lungs aged ≥ 70 years is rarely reported, and recipient outcomes are unknown. Accordingly, we report a single-center series of lung transplantations from donors aged ≥ 70 years and compare outcomes with contemporary lung transplantations from younger donors. METHODS: All bilateral lung transplantations performed at our center between March 2011 and July 2014 were analyzed, and 2 cohorts were built according to lung donor age. RESULTS: A total of 440 bilateral lung transplantations were performed from 413 donors aged <70 years, and 27 donors aged ≥70 years. Donor characteristics did not differ in sex, donor time on mechanical ventilation before retrieval, or donor partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio. Older donors were significantly less often positive for smoking history (43.7% vs 14.8%, p = 0.003) or for abnormal bronchoscopy results (52.9% vs 15.8%, p = 0.002). Recipients receiving donor lungs aged <70 years were younger than those receiving older donor lungs ≥ 70 (49.8 [range, 35-58] vs 58 [range, 53-62] years, p < 0.0001). Underlying diagnoses did not differ significantly between the groups. Post-operative mechanical ventilation times (15 [range, 10-59] vs 27.5 [range, 10-75.8] hours), intensive care unit stays (3 [range, 1-5] vs 3 [range, 1-8] days), and total hospital lengths of stay (24 [range, 22-40.5] vs 24 [range, 22-40] days) of the recipients did not differ significantly between the two groups. The percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 86.5% ± 26.2% 12 months after transplantation of younger lungs vs 72.2% ± 23.8% (p = 0.01) after transplantation of older lungs. Differentiating the spirometry findings according to underlying diseases showed significantly lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second values after transplantation of donor lungs aged ≥70 only in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis recipients but not in emphysemapatients. Patient survival up to 36 months was not significantly different, with 1-year survival being 92.9% for younger vs 95.5% for older donor lungs. CONCLUSION: Use of donor lungs aged ≥70 years for transplantation is safe, without compromising survival. However, spirometry findings after transplantation with donors ≥70 years indicate better functional outcomes in emphysema recipients than in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis recipients.
Authors: Dirk Van Raemdonck; Robin Vos; Jonas Yserbyt; Herbert Decaluwe; Paul De Leyn; Geert M Verleden Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Michael S Mulligan; David Weill; R Duane Davis; Jason D Christie; Farhood Farjah; Jonathan P Singer; Matthew Hartwig; Pablo G Sanchez; Daniel Kreisel; Lorraine B Ware; Christian Bermudez; Ramsey R Hachem; Michael J Weyant; Cynthia Gries; Jeremiah W Awori Hayanga; Bartley P Griffith; Laurie D Snyder; Jonah Odim; J Matthew Craig; Neil R Aggarwal; Lora A Reineck Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-08-18 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jacqueline M Smits; Jens Gottlieb; Erik Verschuuren; Patrick Evrard; Rogier Hoek; Christiane Knoop; György Lang; Johanna M Kwakkel-van Erp; Robin Vos; Geert Verleden; Benoit Rondelet; Daniel Hoefer; Frank Langer; Rene Schramm; Konrad Hoetzenecker; Diana van Kessel; Bart Luijk; Leonard Seghers; Tobias Deuse; Roland Buhl; Christian Witt; Agita Strelniece; Dave Green; Erwin de Vries; Guenter Laufer; Dirk Van Raemdonck Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 3.782