PURPOSE: In patients with small-fiber neuropathy (SFN), noninvasive diagnostic tests that allow accurate monitoring of disease progression are urgently needed. The aim of this study was to assess corneal trigeminal small sensory nerves and immune cells by in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) in SFN. METHODS: In this prospective single-center study, 14 patients with histologically confirmed SFN were analyzed. CCM parameters [corneal nerve fiber density (NFD); the total number of nerves, main trunks, and branches; nerve tortuosity; and dendritic cell density] were compared with 14 age-matched healthy controls and correlated with clinical symptoms, disease course, and histopathological findings. RESULTS: Corneal NFD (15,489.3 ± 5927.6 μm/mm² vs. 22,687.1 ± 4328.7 μm/mm²; P = 0.001) and the total number of nerves (10.4 ± 4.6/frame vs. 18.5 ± 4.8/frame; P < 0.0001) were significantly reduced in patients with SFN. In contrast, nerve tortuosity was significantly increased (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5; P = 0.02). Corneal NFD did not correlate with intraepidermal NFD (ρ = -0.158; P = 0.5) or clinical symptoms (cold P = 0.1; prickling P = 0.2; burning P = 0.8; formication P = 0.7; stabbing P = 0.4; rubbing 0.1; pressure P = 0.1). The average dendritic cell density was increased in SFN (33.5 ± 57.5 cells/mm² vs. 16.1 ± 13.7 cells/mm²) but did not reach significance (P = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: CCM provides parameters that reliably indicate injury to sensory afferents of the trigeminal nerve in patients with SFN. Our data suggest that CCM may serve both as a noninvasive diagnostic test and as a surrogate marker in SFN.
PURPOSE: In patients with small-fiber neuropathy (SFN), noninvasive diagnostic tests that allow accurate monitoring of disease progression are urgently needed. The aim of this study was to assess corneal trigeminal small sensory nerves and immune cells by in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) in SFN. METHODS: In this prospective single-center study, 14 patients with histologically confirmed SFN were analyzed. CCM parameters [corneal nerve fiber density (NFD); the total number of nerves, main trunks, and branches; nerve tortuosity; and dendritic cell density] were compared with 14 age-matched healthy controls and correlated with clinical symptoms, disease course, and histopathological findings. RESULTS:Corneal NFD (15,489.3 ± 5927.6 μm/mm² vs. 22,687.1 ± 4328.7 μm/mm²; P = 0.001) and the total number of nerves (10.4 ± 4.6/frame vs. 18.5 ± 4.8/frame; P < 0.0001) were significantly reduced in patients with SFN. In contrast, nerve tortuosity was significantly increased (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5; P = 0.02). Corneal NFD did not correlate with intraepidermal NFD (ρ = -0.158; P = 0.5) or clinical symptoms (cold P = 0.1; prickling P = 0.2; burning P = 0.8; formication P = 0.7; stabbing P = 0.4; rubbing 0.1; pressure P = 0.1). The average dendritic cell density was increased in SFN (33.5 ± 57.5 cells/mm² vs. 16.1 ± 13.7 cells/mm²) but did not reach significance (P = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: CCM provides parameters that reliably indicate injury to sensory afferents of the trigeminal nerve in patients with SFN. Our data suggest that CCM may serve both as a noninvasive diagnostic test and as a surrogate marker in SFN.
Authors: Harriet I Kemp; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Andrew S C Rice; Jan Vollert; Christoph Maier; Dietrich Strum; Marc Schargus; Tunde Peto; Scott Hau; Reena Chopra; Rayaz A Malik Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Tina B McKay; Yashar Seyed-Razavi; Chiara E Ghezzi; Gabriela Dieckmann; Thomas J F Nieland; Dana M Cairns; Rachel E Pollard; Pedram Hamrah; David L Kaplan Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Dietrich Sturm; Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke; Tineke Greiner; Christoph Maier; Marc Schargus; Martin Tegenthoff; Matthias Vorgerd Journal: Case Rep Neurol Date: 2016-06-27
Authors: Steven J Middleton; Allison M Barry; Maddalena Comini; Yan Li; Pradipta R Ray; Stephanie Shiers; Andreas C Themistocleous; Megan L Uhelski; Xun Yang; Patrick M Dougherty; Theodore J Price; David L Bennett Journal: Brain Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 15.255