| Literature DB >> 26186216 |
Yongqiang Liu1, Zhongyue Wang1, Junping Su1, Weiwei Liu1, Khalid Hussain Dhiloo1, Yuyuan Guo1.
Abstract
Bio-insecticidal effects of seven Chinese medicinal herbs on mortality, fecundity, developmental periods and life table parameters of the grape phylloxera were investigated. In an excised root bioassay experiment aqueous extracts from seven Chinese medicinal herbs increased grape phylloxera first instar mortality (26.00-38.50%) compared to other instars. The intrinsic rate of increase (rm), finite rate of increase (λ), fecundity rate and net reproductive rate (R0) were significantly reduced by A. bidentata, A. tataricus, O. basilicum, P. frutescens and N. cataria. In a glasshouse pot trial, eggs, nymphs, adults and total population were significantly reduced before population establishment compared to those after its population established, by A. bidentata, A. tataricus and O. basilicum. Overall, A. bidentata, A. tataricus and O. basilicum can be used to suppress all life-stages of grape phylloxera.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26186216 PMCID: PMC4505868 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Selected Chinese medicinal herbs with known insecticidal activity.
| Chinese medicinal herbs | Family | Common name | Pharmaceutical name | Target insects |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Amaranthaceae | Two tooth Achyranthes Root | Radix Achyranthis Bidentatae |
|
|
| Compositae | Tatarian Aster Root | Radix Asteris |
|
|
| Labiatae | Fineleaf Schizonepeta Herb | Radix Schizonepetae |
|
|
| Labiatae | Perilla Leaf | Folium Perillae Argutae |
|
|
| Labiatae | Catnip | Herba Schizonepetae |
|
|
| Labiatae | Mint | Radix Scurellariae | Ants, Mosquitoes, Wasps, Hornets and Cockroaches [ |
|
| Leguminosae | Semen Cassiae | Semen Cassiae Obtusifoliae |
|
Fig 1Mean mortality (%±SE) of grape phylloxera eggs, on grapevine root treated with aqueous root extract of Chinese medicinal herbs.
Within each diagram and instars, means followed by the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey’s HSD test, P>0.05).
Life history parameters (mean ± SE) of grape phylloxera treated by aqueous root extract of seven Chinese medicinal herbs.
| Treatments | Egg incubation (days) | 1st instar (days) | 2nd instar (days) | 3rd instar (days) | 4th instar (days) | Adults (days) | Total life span (days) | Fecundity (eggs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6.29 ± 0.17 a | 18.73 ± 0.48 d | 6.54 ± 0.37 d | 1.62 ± 0.09 b | 1.16 ± 0.08 b | 20.38 ± 0.45 d | 55.12 ± 0.79 a | 125.56 ± 7.66 e |
|
| 6.22 ± 0.10 a | 17.94 ± 0.49 cd | 6.29 ± 0.20 d | 1.75 ± 0.22 b | 1.18 ± 0.03 b | 21.29 ± 0.91 d | 53.86 ± 0.75 a | 138.49 ± 4.17 de |
|
| 6.20 ± 0.09 a | 16.67 ± 0.44 bc | 5.41 ± 0.12 c | 1.35 ± 0.07 ab | 0.94 ± 0.06 b | 23.05 ± 0.32 d | 53.81 ± 0.61 a | 151.61 ± 6.29 cde |
|
| 6.19 ± 0.05 a | 15.24 ± 0.32 ab | 5.18 ± 0.17 bc | 1.06 ± 0.04 a | 0.94 ± 0.01 b | 24.78 ± 0.38 cd | 53.66 ± 0.55 a | 160.10 ± 8.27 cde |
|
| 6.11 ± 0.06 a | 15.11 ± 0.38 ab | 4.78 ± 0.17 bc | 1.06 ± 0.05 a | 0.90 ± 0.06 b | 25.41 ± 0.71 cd | 53.74 ± 0.93 a | 173.24 ± 6.25 bcd |
|
| 6.03 ± 0.02 a | 14.90 ± 0.17 a | 4.54 ± 0.13 ab | 0.97 ± 0.07 a | 0.89 ± 0.03 b | 25.66 ± 0.62 bc | 52.89 ± 0.79 a | 178.24 ± 11.25 abc |
|
| 6.01 ± 0.00 a | 14.68 ± 0.24 a | 4.33 ± 0.10 ab | 0.93 ± 0.04 a | 0.88 ± 0.03 a | 26.23 ± 0.25 ab | 53.01 ± 0.46 a | 188.13 ± 3.45 ab |
| Control | 6.00 ± 0.03 a | 14.53 ± 0.27 a | 3.73 ± 0.03 a | 0.93 ± 0.04 a | 0.84 ± 0.02 a | 26.35 ± 0.35 a | 52.53 ± 0.61 a | 201.24 ± 2.88 a |
Life table parameters (mean ± SE) of grape phylloxera treated by aqueous root extract of Chinese medicinal herbs.
| Treatments | Intrinsic rate of increase (rm) | Finite rate of increase (λ) | Net reproductive rate (R0) | Mean generation time (T) | Population doubling time (DT) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.085 ± 0.005 e | 1.089 ± 0.005 e | 42.335 ± 10.919 c | 43.523 ± 1.187 d | 8.127 ± 0.457 d |
|
| 0.097 ± 0.015 de | 1.102 ± 0.017 de | 65.121 ± 46.008 bc | 41.590 ± 1.298 cd | 7.267 ± 1.013 cd |
|
| 0.106 ± 0.001 cd | 1.112 ± 0.002 cd | 69.915 ± 12.218 bc | 39.782 ± 1.299 bc | 6.514 ± 0.089 bc |
|
| 0.120 ± 0.009 bc | 1.127 ± 0.010 bc | 100.377 ± 29.529 bc | 38.172 ± 0.473 ab | 5.814 ± 0.438 ab |
|
| 0.118 ± 0.006 bc | 1.125 ± 0.007 bc | 91.650 ± 12.910 b | 38.281 ± 1.128 ab | 5.889 ± 0.303 ab |
|
| 0.129 ± 0.005 ab | 1.137 ± 0.005 ab | 111.835 ± 20.270 ab | 36.614 ± 0.779 a | 5.400 ± 0.201 a |
|
| 0.132 ± 0.004 ab | 1.142 ± 0.005 ab | 118.220 ± 12.285 ab | 36.021 ± 0.645 a | 5.238 ± 0.177 a |
| Control | 0.139 ± 0.005 a | 1.149 ± 0.005 a | 163.755 ± 16.951 a | 36.616 ± 0.656 a | 4.984 ± 0.161 a |
The effects of Chinese medicinal herbs to grape phylloxera in potted grapevine bioassay before its population established.
| Treatments | No. of grape phylloxera per plant | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eggs | Nymphs | Adults | Total population | |
|
| 19.87 ± 1.92 c | 20.27 ± 1.14 b | 8.80 ± 1.80 c | 48.93 ± 3.21 c |
|
| 25.54 ± 5.50 bc | 26.79 ± 8.80 b | 11.28 ± 1.86 bc | 63.61 ± 11.32 bc |
|
| 32.24 ± 4.26 b | 30.94 ± 9.08 b | 16.50 ± 4.48 b | 79.69 ± 15.32 b |
| Control | 82.69 ± 0.30 a | 68.44 ± 8.34 a | 63.22 ± 0.71 a | 214.36 ± 7.57 a |
The effects of Chinese medicinal herbs to grape phylloxera in potted grapevine bioassay after its population established.
| Treatments | No. of grape phylloxera per plant | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eggs | Nymphs | Adults | Total population | |
|
| 79.80±5.33 b | 76.27 ± 5.71 a | 36.33 ± 3.07 b | 192.40 ± 13.87 b |
|
| 88.33 ± 4.10 b | 79.13 ± 7.72 a | 48.27 ± 4.39 b | 215.73 ± 16.07 b |
|
| 92.87 ± 5.25 b | 79.73 ± 4.16 a | 51.80 ± 3.34 ab | 224.40 ± 12.73 b |
| Control | 127.00 ± 15.09 a | 91.87 ± 12.10 a | 73.07 ± 15.84 a | 291.93 ± 42.36 a |
Fig 2The decline rate of grape phylloxera eggs (A), nymphs (B), adults (C) and total population (eggs, nymphs and adults) (D) on potted grapevines before (pot experiment 1) and after (pot experiment 2) its population established.
** indicate a significant difference determined by t-test.