Literature DB >> 26186138

Quantity, composition and water contamination potential of ash produced under different wildfire severities.

Cristina Santín1, Stefan H Doerr2, Xosé L Otero3, Chris J Chafer4.   

Abstract

Wildfires frequently threaten water quality through the transfer of eroded ash and soil into rivers and reservoirs. The ability to anticipate risks for water resources from wildfires is fundamental for implementing effective fire preparedness plans and post-fire mitigation measures. Here we present a new approach that allows quantifying the amount and characteristics of ash generated under different wildfire severities and its respective water contamination potential. This approach is applied to a wildfire in an Australian dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest, but can be adapted for use in other environments. The Balmoral fire of October 2013 affected 12,694 ha of Sydney's forested water supply catchment. It produced substantial ash loads that increased with fire severity, with 6, 16 and 34 Mg ha(-1) found in areas affected by low, high and extreme fire severity, respectively. Ash bulk density was also positively related to fire severity. The increase with fire severity in the total load and bulk density of the ash generated is mainly attributed to a combination of associated increases in (i) total amount of fuel affected by fire and (ii) contribution of charred mineral soil to the ash layer. Total concentrations of pollutants and nutrients in ash were mostly unrelated to fire severity and relatively low compared to values reported for wildfire ash in other environments (e.g. 4.0-7.3mg As kg(-1); 2.3-4.1 B mg kg(-1); 136-154 P mg kg(-1)). Solubility of the elements analysed was also low, less than 10% of the total concentration for all elements except for B (6-14%) and Na (30-50%). This could be related to a partial loss of soluble components by leaching and/or wind erosion before the ash sampling (10 weeks after the fire and before major ash mobilisation by water erosion). Even with their relatively low concentrations of potential pollutants, the substantial total ash loads found here represent a water contamination risk if transported into the hydrological network during severe erosion events. For example, up to 4 Mg of ash-derived P could be delivered into a single water supply reservoir.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ash chemistry; Bushfire; Forest fire; Soil erosion; Water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26186138     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  5 in total

1.  Aquatic ecotoxicity of ashes from Brazilian savanna wildfires.

Authors:  Darlan Q Brito; Carlos José S Passos; Daphne H F Muniz; Eduardo C Oliveira-Filho
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Organic Chemical Contaminants in Water System Infrastructure Following Wildfire.

Authors:  William M Draper; Na Li; Gina M Solomon; Yvonne C Heaney; Reese B Crenshaw; Richard L Hinrichs; R Esala P Chandrasena
Journal:  ACS ES T Water       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 3.  At the nexus of fire, water and society.

Authors:  Deborah A Martin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Trace Elements in Stormflow, Ash, and Burned Soil following the 2009 Station Fire in Southern California.

Authors:  Carmen A Burton; Todd M Hoefen; Geoffrey S Plumlee; Katherine L Baumberger; Adam R Backlin; Elizabeth Gallegos; Robert N Fisher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Potentially Toxic Substances and Associated Risks in Soils Affected by Wildfires: A Review.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Fernandez-Marcos
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-01-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.