Literature DB >> 26185309

Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Updates at an Academic Medical Center That Performs Primary HER2 FISH Testing: Increase in Equivocal Results and Utility of Reflex Immunohistochemistry.

Kristen E Muller1, Jonathan D Marotti1, Vincent A Memoli1, Wendy A Wells1, Laura J Tafe2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline updates lowered the threshold for HER2 positivity and altered the equivocal category. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of these changes on the distribution of HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) status. The utility of reflex HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) for FISH equivocal cases was also examined.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all invasive breast cancers analyzed for HER2 via dual-probe FISH (PathVysion; Abbott Laboratories. Abbott Park, IL) 12 months before and after the HER2 guidelines updates were implemented. Reflex HER2 IHC results were recorded for HER2 FISH equivocal cases.
RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the number of HER2 FISH equivocal results after the guideline updates (4.9% vs 1.4%, P = .0087) that was independent of specimen type (core vs surgical, P = .6). All 17 FISH equivocal cases after the updates had reflex HER2 IHC: two (12%) of 17 were positive, 12 (71%) of 17 remained equivocal, and three (18%) of 17 were negative.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline updates resulted in an increase in HER2 FISH equivocal results, which can be attributed to HER2 copy number, regardless of the HER2/CEP17 ratio. Reflex IHC for FISH equivocal cases is of limited utility; however, IHC does assign HER2 positivity or negativity in a small percentage of cases. Copyright© by the American Society for Clinical Pathology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASCO/CAP HER2 guidelines; Breast cancer; HER2 FISH; HER2 IHC

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26185309     DOI: 10.1309/AJCPE5NCHWPSMR5D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  9 in total

1.  Application of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline and the SISH technique for HER2 testing of breast cancer selects more patients for anti-HER2 treatment.

Authors:  António Polónia; Dina Leitão; Fernando Schmitt
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 revised guidelines on HER2 results in breast core biopsies with invasive breast carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Wynton B Overcast; Jianying Zhang; Debra L Zynger; Gary H Tozbikian
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Assessment of dual-probe Her-2 fluorescent in situ hybridization in breast cancer by the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines produces more equivocal results than that by the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines.

Authors:  Xiao-Long Qian; Hannah Y Wen; Yi-Ling Yang; Feng Gu; Xiao-Jing Guo; Fang-Fang Liu; Lanjing Zhang; Xin-Min Zhang; Li Fu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Clinicopathologic features of breast cancer reclassified as HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization with alternative chromosome 17 probes.

Authors:  Kristen C Blanton; Allison M Deal; Kathleen A Kaiser-Rogers; Carey K Anders; Siobhan M O'Connor; Johann D Hertel; Benjamin C Calhoun
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 2.090

5.  Regional Variability in Percentage of Breast Cancers Reported as Positive for HER2 in California: Implications of Patient Demographics on Laboratory Benchmarks.

Authors:  Chieh-Yu Lin; Eugene E Carneal; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Scarlett L Gomez; Christina A Clarke; Kristin C Jensen; Allison W Kurian; Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.400

6.  Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 Status in HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers by FISH and 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP Guidelines.

Authors:  Michael F Press; Jose A Seoane; Christina Curtis; Emmanuel Quinaux; Roberta Guzman; Guido Sauter; Wolfgang Eiermann; John R Mackey; Nicholas Robert; Tadeusz Pienkowski; John Crown; Miguel Martin; Vicente Valero; Valerie Bee; Yanling Ma; Ivonne Villalobos; Dennis J Slamon
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Wei Ding; Ke Sun; Xiaoling Wang; Liming Xu; Xiaodong Teng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy.

Authors:  James Crespo; Hongxia Sun; Jimin Wu; Qing-Qing Ding; Guilin Tang; Melissa K Robinson; Hui Chen; Aysegul A Sahin; Bora Lim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  HER2 copy number as predictor of disease-free survival in HER2-positive resectable gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Zimin Liu; Mingpeng Shi; Xiaoxiao Li; Shanai Song; Ning Liu; Haiwei Du; Junyi Ye; Haiyan Li; Zhou Zhang; Lu Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.553

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.