Ferdinando Ferrara1, Antonio Cipriani2, Santi Rapisarda2, Marta Iacobucci2, Nicola Magarelli2, Antonello Leone2, Lorenzo Bonomo2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Correct alignment of prosthetic components is the most important factor for the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) may be a reliable method in determining implant position after TKA.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of DECT in determining implant position after TKA.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Forty-five patients (age 75.2 ± 6.4 years) prospectively underwent TKA at our institution between May and December 2012. DECT was performed 1 year after surgery, using an alignment similar to a standing position and generating images at an extrapolated energy of 120 kVp, in order to reduce metal artifacts. Implant position was evaluated by two independent readers. Intra- and inter-observer agreements were calculated. DECT measurements on implant position were compared with the preoperative planning based on radiographs. Additional clinical and DECT findings were taken into account.
RESULTS: Metal artifact reduction was judged satisfactory in all cases. Regarding implant position assessed with DECT, good to excellent intra-observer (k: 0.74-0.87 and k: 0.75-0.88, respectively), and inter-observer agreement (k: 0.72-0.82) were found. In the comparison with preoperative planning, the widest limits of agreement were within 3.9° for the sagittal orientation of tibial component. A single patient with postoperative knee pain and stiffness had periprosthetic osteopenia, quadriceps femoris tendon calcifications, articular effusion, and excessive intrarotation of the femoral component.
CONCLUSION: DECT is an accurate and reproducible tool for determining implant position after TKA. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2015.
BACKGROUND: Correct alignment of prosthetic components is the most important factor for the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) may be a reliable method in determining implant position after TKA.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of DECT in determining implant position after TKA.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Forty-five patients (age 75.2 ± 6.4 years) prospectively underwent TKA at our institution between May and December 2012. DECT was performed 1 year after surgery, using an alignment similar to a standing position and generating images at an extrapolated energy of 120 kVp, in order to reduce metal artifacts. Implant position was evaluated by two independent readers. Intra- and inter-observer agreements were calculated. DECT measurements on implant position were compared with the preoperative planning based on radiographs. Additional clinical and DECT findings were taken into account.
RESULTS: Metal artifact reduction was judged satisfactory in all cases. Regarding implant position assessed with DECT, good to excellent intra-observer (k: 0.74-0.87 and k: 0.75-0.88, respectively), and inter-observer agreement (k: 0.72-0.82) were found. In the comparison with preoperative planning, the widest limits of agreement were within 3.9° for the sagittal orientation of tibial component. A single patient with postoperative knee pain and stiffness had periprosthetic osteopenia, quadriceps femoris tendon calcifications, articular effusion, and excessive intrarotation of the femoral component.
CONCLUSION: DECT is an accurate and reproducible tool for determining implant position after TKA. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2015.
Entities:
Keywords:
Knee arthroplasty; dual-energy computed tomography; implant position control
Mesh：
Year: 2015
PMID： 26185267 DOI： 10.1177/0284185115595656
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Radiol ISSN： 0284-1851 Impact factor: 1.990